• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种生物活性材料与不同通用粘结剂的剪切粘结强度的比较评估——一项研究。

The comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of a bioactive material to different universal bonding agents - An study.

作者信息

Rai Amulya Vittal, Naik Balaram Damodar

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, A Constituent College of Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):470-474. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_84_20. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_84_20
PMID:33082664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7537751/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An ideal dental repair material should possess certain important properties such as adequate adhesive ability, insolubility, dimensional stability, biocompatibility, and bioactivity. Newer materials claiming better performance are continuously being introduced in the market to optimize the care of dental patients.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three different universal adhesives to OrthoMTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four specimens of OrthoMTA measuring 4 mm internal diameter and 2 mm height were prepared and divided into two main groups. After 12 min, 32 samples were randomly selected and divided into four subgroups of eight samples each. Subgroup-I: Single Bond Universal, Subgroup-II: Prime-and-Bond NT, Subgroup-III: Palfique Universal bond, Subgroup-IV: Control. After the application of adhesives, the composite resin was applied using a cylindrical plastic matrix of 2 mm internal diameter and 2 mm height over OrthoMTA. This procedure was repeated 24 h after mixing an additional 32 samples, respectively. Shear bond strengths were measured using Universal testing machine and fractured specimen were examined under stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed using a two-way ANOVA test and Tukey's multiple test.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed that subgroup-III exhibited higher bond strength at both 12 min and 24 h time intervals. It was also observed that most of the failures occurred cohesively within OrthoMTA.

CONCLUSION

Shear bond strength was higher at 24 h than compared to 12 min. Subgroup-III exhibited higher bond strength than other subgroups.

摘要

背景

理想的牙科修复材料应具备某些重要特性,如足够的粘结能力、不溶性、尺寸稳定性、生物相容性和生物活性。市场上不断推出声称性能更好的新型材料,以优化对牙科患者的护理。

目的

本研究的目的是评估三种不同通用粘结剂与正颌MTA的剪切粘结强度。

材料与方法

制备64个内径4mm、高2mm的正颌MTA样本,并分为两个主要组。12分钟后,随机选取32个样本,再分为四个亚组,每组八个样本。亚组I:单键通用粘结剂,亚组II:预粘结和粘结NT,亚组III:帕尔菲克通用粘结剂,亚组IV:对照组。涂抹粘结剂后,使用内径2mm、高2mm的圆柱形塑料基质在正颌MTA上涂抹复合树脂。分别在混合另外32个样本24小时后重复此过程。使用万能试验机测量剪切粘结强度,并在立体显微镜下检查断裂的样本。数据使用双向方差分析和Tukey多重检验进行统计分析。

结果

统计分析表明,亚组III在12分钟和24小时间隔时均表现出较高的粘结强度。还观察到大多数失败发生在正颌MTA内部的内聚破坏。

结论

24小时时的剪切粘结强度高于12分钟时。亚组III表现出比其他亚组更高的粘结强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acb2/7537751/c9ed803d47a4/JCD-22-470-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acb2/7537751/5c725fdb5c6a/JCD-22-470-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acb2/7537751/c9ed803d47a4/JCD-22-470-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acb2/7537751/5c725fdb5c6a/JCD-22-470-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acb2/7537751/c9ed803d47a4/JCD-22-470-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of a bioactive material to different universal bonding agents - An study.一种生物活性材料与不同通用粘结剂的剪切粘结强度的比较评估——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):470-474. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_84_20. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of a bioactive material to composite resin using three different universal bonding agents: An study.使用三种不同通用粘结剂对生物活性材料与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度进行的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;25(1):54-57. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_549_21. Epub 2022 May 2.
3
Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.不同粘结剂对复合粘结瓷与牙釉质剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):394-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.58.
4
Effects of the Contents of Various Solvents in One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Shear Bond Strengths to Enamel and Dentin.一步法自酸蚀粘接剂中各种溶剂含量对牙釉质和牙本质剪切粘接强度的影响
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):1260-1268.
5
Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia to composite resin using different adhesive systems.使用不同粘结系统评估氧化锆与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Mar 1;11(3):e257-e263. doi: 10.4317/jced.55428. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Shear bond strengths of two composite core materials after using all-in-one and single-bottle dentin adhesives.使用多合一和单瓶装牙本质粘合剂后两种复合核心材料的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthodont. 2005 Jun;14(2):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00018.x.
7
Enamel Wetness Effects on Microshear Bond Strength of Different Bonding Agents (Adhesive Systems): An in vitro Comparative Evaluation Study.釉质湿润度对不同粘结剂(粘结系统)微剪切粘结强度的影响:一项体外比较评估研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 May 1;17(5):399-407. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1862.
8
Comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of adhesive and self-adhesive resin luting agents to three commercially available composite core build-up materials: An study.粘合剂和自粘树脂粘结剂与三种市售复合核心堆积材料的剪切粘结强度比较评估:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Jul-Sep;19(3):255-260. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_84_19.
9
Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin.富钙混合水泥和三氧化矿物凝聚体与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):457-62. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1076.
10
Effect of acid etching time and a self-etching adhesive on the shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain.酸蚀时间和自酸蚀粘结剂对复合树脂与瓷剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2006 Feb;8(1):21-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of a bioactive material to composite resin using three different universal bonding agents: An study.使用三种不同通用粘结剂对生物活性材料与复合树脂的剪切粘结强度进行的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;25(1):54-57. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_549_21. Epub 2022 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the bond strength of different adhesive agents to a resin-modified calcium silicate material (TheraCal LC).不同粘结剂与树脂改性硅酸钙材料(TheraCal LC)粘结强度的评估。
Scanning. 2016 Sep;38(5):403-411. doi: 10.1002/sca.21284. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
2
A randomized controlled trial of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA and RetroMTA for pulpotomy in primary molars.一项关于ProRoot MTA、OrthoMTA和RetroMTA用于乳牙牙髓切断术的随机对照试验。
Oral Dis. 2015 Sep;21(6):785-91. doi: 10.1111/odi.12348. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
3
Shear bond strength of calcium enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin with two different adhesive systems.
富钙混合水泥和三氧化矿物凝聚体与两种不同粘结系统的复合树脂之间的剪切粘结强度。
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Nov;11(6):665-71. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
4
Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate surface treatments on morphology and bond strength to composite resin.三氧化矿物凝聚体表面处理对其形态及与复合树脂粘结强度的影响。
J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
5
Analysis of six heavy metals in Ortho mineral trioxide aggregate and ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry.采用电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法分析正硅酸三钙骨水泥和ProRoot硅酸三钙骨水泥中的六种重金属。
Aust Endod J. 2013 Dec;39(3):126-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2012.00349.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
6
Response of human dental pulp capped with biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate.人牙髓用生物陶瓷和三氧化矿物凝聚体覆盖的反应。
J Endod. 2013 Jun;39(6):743-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Bond strength of adhesive systems to mineral trioxide aggregate with different time intervals.不同时间间隔下黏结剂系统对矿物三氧化物聚合体的粘结强度。
J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
8
The shear bond strength of resin-based composite to white mineral trioxide aggregate.树脂基复合材料与白色三氧化矿物聚合体的抗剪粘结强度。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Aug;143(8):e40-5. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0302.
9
Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties.矿物三氧化物聚合体:全面文献综述——第一部分:化学、物理和抗菌性能。
J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.006.
10
The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems.采用两种不同粘结系统对复合树脂和复合体与白色三氧化二矿物聚合物的粘结强度进行评估。
J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):603-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.026.