• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与高/低碳水化合物饮食相比,不同饮食方式对2型糖尿病患者收缩压和舒张压的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Effect of Different Dietary Approaches in Comparison with High/Low-Carbohydrate Diets on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Abbasnezhad Amir, Falahi Ebrahim, Gonzalez Michael J, Kavehi Parivash, Fouladvand Faezeh, Choghakhori Razieh

机构信息

Nutritional Health Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad 6813833946, Iran.

Department of Human Development, School of Public Health, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan 00936-5067, Puerto Rico.

出版信息

Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2020 Sep 30;25(3):233-245. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.233.

DOI:10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.233
PMID:33083372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7541922/
Abstract

Dietary modification is an effective method for preventing and managing hypertension. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of different dietary approaches for comparing high- and low-carbohydrate diets on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We carried out a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus without any language and time restrictions until April, 2019. We carried out a meta-analysis using both fixed and random effects models where appropriate and used the I index to evaluate heterogeneity. We identified 16 eligible studies, with a total of 1,610 participants. The overall pooled net effect of different dietary approaches on SBP and DBP were -2.29 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.49 to -1.1] and -1.03 mmHg (95% CI: -1.77 to -0.29), respectively, compared with high-carbohydrate diets. Indeed, diets high in monounsaturated fatty acids more effective in reducing both SBP and DBP than high-carbohydrate diets, whereas high-protein diets were not effective. Furthermore, we found that different dietary approaches, such as low-fat diets, did not reduce SBP or DBP to a greater extent than low-carbohydrate diets. Overall, the results of our meta-analysis show that diets high in monounsaturated fatty acids are more effective in reducing both SBP and DBP than diets high in carbohydrate, whereas other dietary approaches were not effective.

摘要

饮食调整是预防和管理高血压的有效方法。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估不同饮食方式对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者收缩压和舒张压(分别为SBP和DBP)的影响,比较高碳水化合物饮食和低碳水化合物饮食。我们使用PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和Scopus进行了全面的文献检索,没有任何语言和时间限制,截至2019年4月。我们在适当的情况下使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并使用I指数评估异质性。我们确定了16项符合条件的研究,共有1610名参与者。与高碳水化合物饮食相比,不同饮食方式对SBP和DBP的总体合并净效应分别为-2.29 mmHg [95%置信区间(CI):-3.49至-1.1]和-1.03 mmHg(95%CI:-1.77至-0.29)。事实上,富含单不饱和脂肪酸的饮食在降低SBP和DBP方面比高碳水化合物饮食更有效,而高蛋白饮食则无效。此外,我们发现不同的饮食方式,如低脂饮食,在降低SBP或DBP方面并不比低碳水化合物饮食更有效。总体而言,我们的荟萃分析结果表明,富含单不饱和脂肪酸 的饮食在降低SBP和DBP方面比富含碳水化合物的饮食更有效,而其他饮食方式则无效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/9de9e9afa75a/PNFS-25-233-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/b21f6c5185c0/PNFS-25-233-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/960204d2a3f7/PNFS-25-233-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/ebd7c7df8f91/PNFS-25-233-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/940ba943c389/PNFS-25-233-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/4bb69d79bdd9/PNFS-25-233-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/9de9e9afa75a/PNFS-25-233-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/b21f6c5185c0/PNFS-25-233-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/960204d2a3f7/PNFS-25-233-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/ebd7c7df8f91/PNFS-25-233-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/940ba943c389/PNFS-25-233-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/4bb69d79bdd9/PNFS-25-233-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba6/7541922/9de9e9afa75a/PNFS-25-233-f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Different Dietary Approaches in Comparison with High/Low-Carbohydrate Diets on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与高/低碳水化合物饮食相比,不同饮食方式对2型糖尿病患者收缩压和舒张压的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2020 Sep 30;25(3):233-245. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2020.25.3.233.
2
Effect of different dietary approaches compared with a regular diet on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同饮食方法与常规饮食相比对 2 型糖尿病患者收缩压和舒张压的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 May;163:108108. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108108. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
3
Effect of high-carbohydrate or high-monounsaturated fatty acid diets on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高碳水化合物或高单不饱和脂肪酸饮食对血压的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Rev. 2019 Jan 1;77(1):19-31. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy040.
4
Comparative effects of different dietary approaches on blood pressure in hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同饮食方法对高血压和高血压前期患者血压影响的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(16):2674-2687. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1463967. Epub 2018 May 11.
5
Effect of high-carbohydrate or high-cis-monounsaturated fat diets on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of intervention trials.高碳水化合物或高顺式单不饱和脂肪饮食对血压的影响:干预试验的荟萃分析
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 May;85(5):1251-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1251.
6
Efficacy of different dietary patterns on lowering of blood pressure level: an umbrella review.不同饮食模式对降低血压水平的效果:伞式评价。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Dec 10;112(6):1584-1598. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa252.
7
8
Low-carbohydrate versus balanced-carbohydrate diets for reducing weight and cardiovascular risk.低碳水化合物饮食与均衡碳水化合物饮食在减轻体重和降低心血管风险方面的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 28;1(1):CD013334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013334.pub2.
9
Effect of Dietary Approaches on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.膳食模式对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 15;15(14):3156. doi: 10.3390/nu15143156.
10
Diets for weight management in adults with type 2 diabetes: an umbrella review of published meta-analyses and systematic review of trials of diets for diabetes remission.成人 2 型糖尿病患者体重管理的饮食方案:已发表荟萃分析的伞状评价和糖尿病缓解饮食试验的系统评价
Diabetologia. 2022 Jan;65(1):14-36. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05577-2. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of dietary carbohydrate intake on glycaemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.饮食碳水化合物摄入量对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制和胰岛素抵抗的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2025 Jun;34(3):282-297. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202506_34(3).0003.
2
Effects of low-carbohydrate diets versus low-fat diets on metabolic risk factors in overweight and obese adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.低碳水化合物饮食与低脂饮食对超重和肥胖成年人代谢危险因素的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 9;9:935234. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.935234. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of high-carbohydrate or high-monounsaturated fatty acid diets on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高碳水化合物或高单不饱和脂肪酸饮食对血压的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Rev. 2019 Jan 1;77(1):19-31. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy040.
2
Comparative effects of different dietary approaches on blood pressure in hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同饮食方法对高血压和高血压前期患者血压影响的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(16):2674-2687. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1463967. Epub 2018 May 11.
3
Blood Sugar, Haemoglobin and Malondialdehyde Levels in Diabetic White Rats Fed a Diet of Corn Flour Cookies.
喂食玉米粉饼干饮食的糖尿病白鼠的血糖、血红蛋白和丙二醛水平
Foods. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):1819. doi: 10.3390/foods11121819.
4
Evaluation of Disparities in Adults' Macronutrient Intake Status: Results from the China Health and Nutrition 2011 Survey.评估成年人宏量营养素摄入状况的差异:来自中国健康与营养 2011 调查的结果。
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 30;13(9):3044. doi: 10.3390/nu13093044.
Therapeutic potential of green tea on risk factors for type 2 diabetes in obese adults - a review.
绿茶对肥胖成年人2型糖尿病危险因素的治疗潜力——综述
Obes Rev. 2016 Dec;17(12):1316-1328. doi: 10.1111/obr.12452. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
4
Effects of Low-Fat Diets Differing in Protein and Carbohydrate Content on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors during Weight Loss and Weight Maintenance in Obese Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.低脂饮食中蛋白质和碳水化合物含量不同对2型糖尿病肥胖成年人减肥和维持体重期间心脏代谢危险因素的影响。
Nutrients. 2016 May 12;8(5):289. doi: 10.3390/nu8050289.
5
Effects of Different Dietary Interventions on Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.不同饮食干预对血压的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Hypertension. 2016 Apr;67(4):733-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06853. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
6
Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降压预防心血管疾病和死亡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
7
Diabetes and Hypertension: A Comparative Review of Current Guidelines.糖尿病与高血压:现行指南的比较综述
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Feb;18(2):95-100. doi: 10.1111/jch.12638. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
Comparison of low- and high-carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes management: a randomized trial.比较低碳水化合物和高碳水化合物饮食对 2 型糖尿病管理的影响:一项随机试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Oct;102(4):780-90. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.112581. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
9
A very low-carbohydrate, low-saturated fat diet for type 2 diabetes management: a randomized trial.一种用于 2 型糖尿病管理的极低碳水化合物、低饱和脂肪饮食:一项随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Nov;37(11):2909-18. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0845. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
10
Benefits of caloric restriction for cardiometabolic health, including type 2 diabetes mellitus risk.热量限制对心脏代谢健康的益处,包括 2 型糖尿病的风险。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014 Mar;30 Suppl 1:41-7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2517.