Suppr超能文献

一线免疫治疗与靶向治疗在 - 突变型晚期黑色素瘤患者中的比较:真实世界分析。

First-line immunotherapy versus targeted therapy in patients with -mutant advanced melanoma: a real-world analysis.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2021 Feb;17(6):689-699. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0643. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Abstract

To compare effectiveness of nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) versus BRAF + MEK inhibitors (BRAFi + MEKi) in patients with -mutant advanced melanoma in the real-world setting. This study used the Flatiron Health electronic medical record database. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, NIVO + IPI was associated with a 32% reduction in risk of death versus BRAFi + MEKi. At a mean follow-up of 15-16 months, 64% of NIVO + IPI patients and 43% of BRAFi + MEKi patients were alive; subsequent therapy was administered to 33 and 41% of patients, respectively. After first-line NIVO + IPI, 20% of patients died before subsequent therapy, whereas 32% died after first-line BRAFi + MEKi. In this real-world study, patients treated with first-line NIVO + IPI showed significant survival benefit versus those receiving first-line BRAFi + MEKi.

摘要

比较纳武利尤单抗+伊匹单抗(NIVO+IPI)与 BRAF+MEK 抑制剂(BRAFi+MEKi)在真实世界环境中治疗 - 突变型晚期黑色素瘤患者的疗效。本研究使用了 Flatiron Health 电子病历数据库。在调整了基线特征差异后,与 BRAFi+MEKi 相比,NIVO+IPI 降低了 32%的死亡风险。在平均 15-16 个月的随访中,NIVO+IPI 组 64%的患者和 BRAFi+MEKi 组 43%的患者存活;分别有 33%和 41%的患者接受了后续治疗。在一线治疗使用 NIVO+IPI 后,有 20%的患者在接受后续治疗前死亡,而一线使用 BRAFi+MEKi 后有 32%的患者死亡。在这项真实世界研究中,与一线接受 BRAFi+MEKi 治疗的患者相比,一线接受 NIVO+IPI 治疗的患者显示出显著的生存获益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验