Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Jun;25(6):623-634. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01402-8. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
The treatment strategy for BRAF-mutated melanoma remains unsatisfactory, although the advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma. This article reports current evidence on the efficacy and safety of sequential immunotherapy with targeted therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. It discusses criteria for the use of available options in clinical practice.
Targeted therapy provides rapid disease control in a relatively high proportion of patients, although the development of secondary resistance limits the duration of responses; in contrast, immunotherapy may induce slow but more durable responses in a subset of patients. Therefore, the identification of a combination strategy for the use of these therapies seems a promising perspective. Currently, inconsistent data have been obtained, but most studies indicate that the administration of BRAFi/MEKi prior to immune checkpoint inhibitors appears to reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy. On the contrary, several clinical and real-life studies suggest that frontline immunotherapy with subsequent targeted therapy may be associated with better tumor control than immunotherapy alone. Larger clinical studies are ongoing to confirm the efficacy and safety of this sequencing strategy for treating BRAF-mutated melanoma with immunotherapy followed by targeted therapy.
尽管免疫检查点抑制剂的出现改善了晚期黑色素瘤的预后,但 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤的治疗策略仍不尽如人意。本文报告了 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者接受靶向治疗序贯免疫治疗的疗效和安全性的现有证据,并讨论了在临床实践中使用现有方案的标准。
靶向治疗在相当一部分患者中能快速控制疾病,尽管继发性耐药的发展限制了缓解的持续时间;相比之下,免疫治疗可能会在一部分患者中诱导缓慢但更持久的反应。因此,确定这些治疗方法的联合策略似乎是一个有前途的方向。目前,得到的数据并不一致,但大多数研究表明,BRAFi/MEKi 在前免疫检查点抑制剂治疗似乎会降低免疫治疗的疗效。相反,一些临床和真实世界的研究表明,一线免疫治疗后继以靶向治疗可能比单独免疫治疗更能更好地控制肿瘤。正在进行更大规模的临床研究以确认这种免疫治疗序贯靶向治疗治疗 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤的疗效和安全性。