• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济激励对低收入患者糖尿病预防计划参与度和体重减轻的影响:我们可以预防糖尿病群组随机对照试验。

The effects of financial incentives on diabetes prevention program attendance and weight loss among low-income patients: the We Can Prevent Diabetes cluster-randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

Minnesota Department of Health, 85 East 7th Place, P.O. Box 64882, St. Paul, MN, 55164, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):1587. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09683-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09683-5
PMID:33087083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7580006/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penetration and participation of real life implementation of lifestyle change programs to prevent type 2 diabetes has been challenging. This is particularly so among low income individuals in the United States. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of financial incentives on attendance and weight loss among Medicaid beneficiaries participating in the 12-month Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).

METHODS

This is a cluster-randomized controlled trial with two financial incentive study arms and an attention control study arm. Medicaid beneficiaries with prediabetes from 13 primary care clinics were randomly assigned to individually earned incentives (IND; 33 groups; n = 309), a hybrid of individual- and group-earned incentives (GRP; 30 groups; n = 259), and an attention control (AC; 30 groups; n = 279). Up to $520 in incentives could be earned for attaining attendance and weight loss goals over 12 months. Outcomes are percent weight loss from baseline, achieving 5% weight loss from baseline, and attending 75% of core and 75% of maintenance DPP sessions. Linear mixed models were used to examine weight change and attendance rates over the 16 weeks and 12 months.

RESULTS

The percent weight change at 16 weeks for the IND, GRP, and AC participants were similar, at - 2.6, - 3.1%, and - 3.4%, respectively. However, participants achieving 5% weight loss in the IND, GRP, and AC groups was 21.5, 24.0% (GRP vs AC, P < 0.05), and 15.2%. Attendance at 75% of the DPP core sessions was significantly higher among IND (60.8%, P < 0.001) and GRP (64.0%, P < 0.001) participants than among AC (38.6%) participants. Despite substantial attrition over time, attendance at 75% of the DPP maintenance sessions was also significantly higher among IND (23.0%, P < 0.001) and GRP (26.1%, P < 0.001) participants than among AC (11.0%) participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Financial incentives can improve the proportion of Medicaid beneficiaries attending the 12-month DPP and achieving at least 5% weight loss.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02422420 ; retrospectively registered April 21, 2015.

摘要

背景

将生活方式改变计划的实际实施渗透并推广到预防 2 型糖尿病的领域,一直具有挑战性。在美国,这对于低收入人群来说尤其如此。本研究的目的是检验财务激励措施对参加为期 12 个月的糖尿病预防计划(DPP)的医疗补助受助人的出勤率和体重减轻的效果。

方法

这是一项具有两个财务激励研究臂和一个注意控制研究臂的聚类随机对照试验。来自 13 个初级保健诊所的前驱糖尿病的医疗补助受助人被随机分配到个人赚取激励(IND;33 组;n=309)、个人和团体赚取激励的混合(GRP;30 组;n=259)和注意控制(AC;30 组;n=279)。在 12 个月内达到出勤率和体重减轻目标,最多可获得 520 美元的激励。结果是从基线开始的体重减轻百分比、从基线开始体重减轻 5%、以及参加核心和维持 DPP 课程的 75%。线性混合模型用于检查 16 周和 12 个月内的体重变化和出勤率。

结果

在第 16 周时,IND、GRP 和 AC 参与者的体重减轻百分比相似,分别为-2.6%、-3.1%和-3.4%。然而,IND、GRP 和 AC 组中体重减轻 5%的参与者比例分别为 21.5%、24.0%(GRP 与 AC 相比,P<0.05)和 15.2%。IND(60.8%,P<0.001)和 GRP(64.0%,P<0.001)参与者参加 DPP 核心课程的比例明显高于 AC(38.6%)参与者。尽管随着时间的推移大量参与者流失,但 IND(23.0%,P<0.001)和 GRP(26.1%,P<0.001)参与者参加 DPP 维持课程的比例也明显高于 AC(11.0%)参与者。

结论

财务激励措施可以提高参加 12 个月 DPP 并至少减轻 5%体重的医疗补助受助人的比例。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02422420;2015 年 4 月 21 日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c526/7580006/e9e4780df282/12889_2020_9683_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c526/7580006/e9e4780df282/12889_2020_9683_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c526/7580006/e9e4780df282/12889_2020_9683_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of financial incentives on diabetes prevention program attendance and weight loss among low-income patients: the We Can Prevent Diabetes cluster-randomized controlled trial.经济激励对低收入患者糖尿病预防计划参与度和体重减轻的影响:我们可以预防糖尿病群组随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):1587. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09683-5.
2
Financial incentives for diabetes prevention in a Medicaid population: Study design and baseline characteristics.医疗补助人群中糖尿病预防的经济激励措施:研究设计与基线特征
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
The impact of financial incentives on utilization and outcomes of diabetes prevention programs among Medicaid managed care adults in New York state.经济激励措施对纽约州医疗补助管理式医疗成年人群中糖尿病预防项目的利用率及效果的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105960. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105960. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Effect of Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives on Weight Loss Among Prediabetic New York Medicaid Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于过程和结果的财务激励对纽约医疗补助计划中糖尿病前期患者体重减轻的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Mar;33(3):372-380. doi: 10.1177/0890117118783594. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Impact of Financial Incentives on Diabetes Prevention Class Attendance and Program Completion: Evidence From Minnesota, Montana, and New York.财务激励对糖尿病预防课程出勤率和课程完成率的影响:来自明尼苏达州、蒙大拿州和纽约的证据。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 May;33(4):601-605. doi: 10.1177/0890117118794087. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
The Pre-Diabetes Interventions and Continued Tracking to Ease-out Diabetes (Pre-DICTED) program: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.糖尿病前期干预和持续追踪以缓解糖尿病(Pre-DICTED)计划:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Aug 6;22(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05500-5.
7
Diabetes Prevention Program Translation in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局的糖尿病预防计划翻译
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.009. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
The role of Sociodemographic factors on goal achievement in a community-based diabetes prevention program behavioral lifestyle intervention.社会人口因素在基于社区的糖尿病预防计划行为生活方式干预中对目标实现的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 2;21(1):1783. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11844-z.
9
Effectiveness of Goal-Directed and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives for Weight Loss in Primary Care Patients With Obesity Living in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: A Randomized Clinical Trial.以目标为导向和以结果为基础的经济激励措施对生活在社会经济弱势社区的肥胖初级保健患者减肥的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jan 1;183(1):61-69. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5618.
10
Mobile Delivery of the Diabetes Prevention Program in People With Prediabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动医疗在糖尿病前期人群中应用糖尿病预防计划的随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e17842. doi: 10.2196/17842.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating oral health into primary healthcare: lessons from project OHE-NCHeW (oral health education for nurses and community health workers) in Nigeria.将口腔健康纳入初级医疗保健:来自尼日利亚OHE-NCHeW项目(护士和社区卫生工作者口腔健康教育)的经验教训。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Jun 20;6:1597243. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1597243. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating Financial Incentives as a Tool to Increase Medication Adherence for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估经济激励措施作为提高2型糖尿病患者药物依从性的工具:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Mar;16(3):527-545. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01694-y. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Using a RE-AIM framework to identify promising practices in National Diabetes Prevention Program implementation.利用 RE-AIM 框架确定国家糖尿病预防计划实施中的有前景的实践。
Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 14;14(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0928-9.
2
New Medicare Diabetes Prevention Coverage May Limit Beneficiary Access and Widen Health Disparities.新的医疗保险糖尿病预防覆盖范围可能限制受益人的获取途径并扩大健康差距。
Med Care. 2018 Nov;56(11):908-911. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000981.
3
Impact of Financial Incentives on Diabetes Prevention Class Attendance and Program Completion: Evidence From Minnesota, Montana, and New York.
Health-promotion interventions targeting multiple behaviors: A meta-analytic review of general and behavior-specific processes of change.
促进健康的干预措施针对多种行为:一般和行为特定变化过程的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;150(7):798-838. doi: 10.1037/bul0000427. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
Staff resilience and innovation essential to New York City diabetes prevention programs going virtual during COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns.在 COVID-19 大流行封锁期间,纽约市糖尿病预防项目转为虚拟模式,工作人员的适应力和创新力至关重要。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):1148. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10129-y.
5
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.行为经济学激励计划对健康饮食、体重控制和身体活动目标实现效果的评估:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Apr 12;57(4):277-287. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac066.
6
Effectiveness of Incentives for Improving Diabetes-Related Health Indicators in Chronic Disease Lifestyle Modification Programs: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.激励措施对改善慢性病生活方式干预项目中糖尿病相关健康指标的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Oct 27;19:E66. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.220151.
7
Baseline characteristics of participants in the Pre-Diabetes Interventions and Continued Tracking to Ease-out Diabetes (Pre-DICTED) Program.糖尿病前期干预和持续跟踪以缓解糖尿病(Pre-DICTED)计划中参与者的基线特征。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Oct;10(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-002966.
8
Formative Qualitative Research: Design Considerations for a Self-Directed Lifestyle Intervention for Type-2 Diabetes Patients Using Human-Centered Design Principles in Benin.形成性定性研究:使用以人为中心的设计原则在贝宁为 2 型糖尿病患者设计自我指导生活方式干预的设计考虑因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;19(18):11552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811552.
9
Barriers to participation and lifestyle change among lower versus higher income participants in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: lifestyle coach perspectives.《国家糖尿病预防计划中低收入参与者与高收入参与者在参与和生活方式改变方面的障碍:生活方式教练的观点》
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):860-869. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac032.
10
Differences in Weight Loss by Race and Ethnicity in the PRIDE Trial: a Qualitative Analysis of Participant Perspectives.PRIDE 试验中不同种族和民族的减肥效果差异:参与者观点的定性分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3715-3722. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07521-5. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
财务激励对糖尿病预防课程出勤率和课程完成率的影响:来自明尼苏达州、蒙大拿州和纽约的证据。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 May;33(4):601-605. doi: 10.1177/0890117118794087. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
Effect of Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives on Weight Loss Among Prediabetic New York Medicaid Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于过程和结果的财务激励对纽约医疗补助计划中糖尿病前期患者体重减轻的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Mar;33(3):372-380. doi: 10.1177/0890117118783594. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Global Diabetes Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Real-World Impact on Incidence, Weight, and Glucose.全球糖尿病预防干预措施:基于真实世界数据的发病率、体重和血糖影响的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jul;41(7):1526-1534. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2222.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of a Community-Based Diabetes Prevention Program with Participation Incentives for Medicaid Beneficiaries.一项针对医疗补助受益人的、带有参与激励措施的社区糖尿病预防项目的成本效益分析。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4704-4724. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12973. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017.2017 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Progress of the Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme: referrals, uptake and participant characteristics.《更健康的你:国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划:转介、参与率和参与者特征》。
Diabet Med. 2018 Apr;35(4):513-518. doi: 10.1111/dme.13562. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
Long-term Sustainability of Diabetes Prevention Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.长期可持续性的糖尿病预防方法:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1808-1817. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6040.
10
Comment on Ely et al. A National Effort to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: Participant-Level Evaluation of CDC's National Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1331-1341.对伊利等人的评论。一项预防2型糖尿病的全国性努力:疾病控制与预防中心国家糖尿病预防计划的参与者层面评估。《糖尿病护理》2017年;40:1331 - 1341。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):e161-e162. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1242.