• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 RE-AIM 框架确定国家糖尿病预防计划实施中的有前景的实践。

Using a RE-AIM framework to identify promising practices in National Diabetes Prevention Program implementation.

机构信息

Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy. Mailstop S107-3, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.

RTI International, RTP, NC, and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 14;14(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0928-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-019-0928-9
PMID:31412894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6694543/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) is rapidly expanding in an effort to help those at high risk of type 2 diabetes prevent or delay the disease. In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded six national organizations to scale and sustain multistate delivery of the National DPP lifestyle change intervention (LCI). This study aims to describe reach, adoption, and maintenance during the 4-year funding period and to assess associations between site-level factors and program effectiveness regarding participant attendance and participation duration.

METHODS

The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to guide the evaluation from October 2012 to September 2016. Multilevel linear regressions were used to examine associations between participant-level demographics and site-level strategies and number of sessions attended, attendance in months 7-12, and duration of participation.

RESULTS

The six funded national organizations increased the number of participating sites from 68 in 2012 to 164 by 2016 across 38 states and enrolled 14,876 eligible participants. By September 2016, coverage for the National DPP LCI was secured for 42 private insurers and 7 public payers. Nearly 200 employers were recruited to offer the LCI on site to their employees. Site-level strategies significantly associated with higher overall attendance, attendance in months 7-12, and longer participation duration included using self-referral or word of mouth as a recruitment strategy, providing non-monetary incentives for participation, and using cultural adaptations to address participants' needs. Sites receiving referrals from healthcare providers or health systems also had higher attendance in months 7-12 and longer participation duration. At the participant level, better outcomes were achieved among those aged 65+ (vs. 18-44 or 45-64), those who were overweight (vs. obesity), those who were non-Hispanic white (vs. non-Hispanic black or multiracial/other races), and those eligible based on a blood test or history of gestational diabetes mellitus (vs. screening positive on a risk test).

CONCLUSIONS

In a time of rapid dissemination of the National DPP LCI the findings of this evaluation can be used to enhance program implementation and translate lessons learned to similar organizations and settings.

摘要

背景

国家糖尿病预防计划(National DPP)正在迅速扩大,旨在帮助那些有患 2 型糖尿病风险的人预防或延缓疾病的发生。2012 年,美国疾病控制与预防中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)资助了六个全国性组织,以扩大和维持国家 DPP 生活方式改变干预(LCI)在多个州的推广。本研究旨在描述在四年资助期间的覆盖范围、采用情况、维持情况,并评估站点层面的因素与参与者出勤率和参与时间之间的关联。

方法

采用“RE-AIM”框架(Reach、Effectiveness、Adoption、Implementation 和 Maintenance)指导 2012 年 10 月至 2016 年 9 月的评估。采用多水平线性回归分析,检验参与者层面的人口统计学特征与站点层面的策略以及参加的课程数量、7-12 个月的出勤率和参与时间之间的关联。

结果

六个资助的全国性组织将参与的站点数量从 2012 年的 68 个增加到 2016 年的 164 个,覆盖了 38 个州,招募了 14876 名合格参与者。截至 2016 年 9 月,National DPP LCI 的覆盖范围已获得 42 家私人保险公司和 7 家公共付款人的认可。近 200 家雇主被招募来为其员工提供现场 LCI。与更高的整体出勤率、7-12 个月的出勤率和更长的参与时间相关的站点层面策略包括使用自我推荐或口碑作为招募策略、为参与提供非货币激励以及使用文化适应来满足参与者的需求。从医疗保健提供者或医疗系统获得转介的站点在 7-12 个月的出勤率和参与时间也更长。在参与者层面,65 岁以上的参与者(与 18-44 岁或 45-64 岁的参与者相比)、超重的参与者(与肥胖的参与者相比)、非西班牙裔白人(与非西班牙裔黑人或多种族/其他种族的参与者相比)和基于血液测试或妊娠糖尿病史合格的参与者(与风险测试呈阳性的参与者相比),结果更好。

结论

在 National DPP LCI 快速传播的时代,本评估的结果可用于增强项目实施,并将经验教训转化为类似组织和环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4918/6694543/09ce7ac1a116/13012_2019_928_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4918/6694543/57f3651437db/13012_2019_928_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4918/6694543/09ce7ac1a116/13012_2019_928_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4918/6694543/57f3651437db/13012_2019_928_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4918/6694543/09ce7ac1a116/13012_2019_928_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a RE-AIM framework to identify promising practices in National Diabetes Prevention Program implementation.利用 RE-AIM 框架确定国家糖尿病预防计划实施中的有前景的实践。
Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 14;14(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0928-9.
2
Application of implementation mapping to develop strategies for integrating the National Diabetes Prevention Program into primary care clinics.实施映射的应用,制定将国家糖尿病预防计划整合到初级保健诊所的策略。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;11:933253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.933253. eCollection 2023.
3
Implementation findings from a hybrid III implementation-effectiveness trial of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).退伍军人事务部(VHA)中糖尿病预防计划(DPP)混合 III 实施效果试验的实施结果。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 26;12(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0619-3.
4
Implementation of the Diabetes Prevention Program in Georgia Cooperative Extension According to RE-AIM and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.根据 RE-AIM 有效性、可实施性、可接受性、实用性和实施研究综合框架,在佐治亚合作推广服务中实施糖尿病预防计划。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):34-45. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01518-0. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
5
Implementation and evaluation of the VA DPP clinical demonstration: protocol for a multi-site non-randomized hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III trial.退伍军人事务部糖尿病预防计划临床示范的实施与评估:一项多中心非随机混合有效性-实施III型试验方案
Implement Sci. 2015 May 12;10:68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0250-0.
6
Evaluation of the University of California Diabetes Prevention Program (UC DPP) Initiative.加利福尼亚大学糖尿病预防计划(UC DPP)倡议评估。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;21(1):1775. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11731-7.
7
A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program.基于群体的生活方式干预在中低收入国家预防糖尿病:喀拉拉邦糖尿病预防计划的实施评估。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 18;13(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0791-0.
8
A National Effort to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: Participant-Level Evaluation of CDC's National Diabetes Prevention Program.全国努力预防 2 型糖尿病:美国疾病控制与预防中心国家糖尿病预防计划的参与者水平评估。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Oct;40(10):1331-1341. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2099. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into an Online Social Network: Validation against CDC Standards.将糖尿病预防计划转化为在线社交网络:对照美国疾病控制与预防中心标准进行验证。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jul;40(4):435-443. doi: 10.1177/0145721714531339. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
10
Implementation of a group-based diabetes prevention program within a healthcare delivery system.在医疗服务系统中实施基于群组的糖尿病预防计划。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4569-0.

引用本文的文献

1
"PrevenganT2," a Culturally Responsive Family-Based Diabetes Prevention Intervention for Hispanic or Latino Adults at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Evaluation.“PrevenganT2”,一项针对2型糖尿病高危西班牙裔或拉丁裔成年人的具有文化适应性的家庭糖尿病预防干预措施:概念验证评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 14;14:e66317. doi: 10.2196/66317.
2
Implementation of diabetes prevention programs into clinical practice and community settings: a systematic search and review.将糖尿病预防项目纳入临床实践和社区环境:系统检索与综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 9;6(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00757-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.为初级保健提供者缩写。
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Jan;39(1):14-43. doi: 10.2337/cd21-as01.
2
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.RE-AIM规划与评估框架:历经20年回顾,适应新科学与实践
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.
3
A Mobile Phone-Based Program to Promote Healthy Behaviors Among Adults With Prediabetes Who Declined Participation in Free Diabetes Prevention Programs: Mixed-Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Identifying recruitment strategies to improve the reach of evidence-based health promotion, disease prevention, and disease self-management interventions: a scoping review.
确定提高循证健康促进、疾病预防和疾病自我管理干预措施覆盖面的招募策略:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;13:1515042. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1515042. eCollection 2025.
4
Examining the reach of a diabetes screening program in an urban emergency department.评估城市急诊科糖尿病筛查项目的覆盖范围。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Dec 27;9:100577. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100577. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Process evaluation of an mHealth-based school education program to reduce salt intake scaling up in China (EduSaltS): a mixed methods study using the RE-AIM framework.基于移动医疗的学校教育项目在中国减少盐摄入量的推广的过程评价(EduSaltS):使用 RE-AIM 框架的混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):2261. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19732-y.
6
Special Report from the CDC: Evaluating the dissemination of CDC's MyMobility Plan: Findings and lessons learned.美国疾病控制与预防中心特别报告:评估 CDC 出行计划的传播情况:调查结果和经验教训。
J Safety Res. 2024 Jun;89:354-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
7
Preferred sources of information on diabetes prevention programmes: a population-based cross-sectional study in Poland.糖尿病预防计划首选信息来源:波兰一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 17;14(5):e083362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083362.
8
Weight Loss in Short-Term Interventions for Physical Activity and Nutrition Among Adults With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.短期身体活动和营养干预对超重或肥胖成年人减肥效果的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Apr 4;21:E21. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.230347.
9
A systematic review of diabetes prevention programs adapted to include family members.一项关于调整为纳入家庭成员的糖尿病预防项目的系统评价。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Feb 15;39:102655. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102655. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
A structural equation model of CFIR inner and outer setting constructs, organization characteristics, and national DPP enrollment.CFIR内部和外部环境构建、组织特征与国家糖尿病预防计划登记的结构方程模型
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 17;4(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00522-3.
基于手机的程序在拒绝参加免费糖尿病预防计划的糖尿病前期成年人中促进健康行为:混合方法试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 9;7(1):e11267. doi: 10.2196/11267.
4
Global Diabetes Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Real-World Impact on Incidence, Weight, and Glucose.全球糖尿病预防干预措施:基于真实世界数据的发病率、体重和血糖影响的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jul;41(7):1526-1534. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2222.
5
Power Up for Health-Participants' Perspectives on an Adaptation of the National Diabetes Prevention Program to Engage Men.为健康助力——参与者对国家糖尿病预防计划改编版以吸引男性参与的看法。
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):981-988. doi: 10.1177/1557988318758786. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
6
Power Up for Health: Pilot Study Outcomes of a Diabetes Prevention Program for Men from Disadvantaged Neighborhoods.为健康充电:针对弱势社区男性的糖尿病预防计划的试点研究结果
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):989-997. doi: 10.1177/1557988318758787. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
Cultural adaptation of a peer-led lifestyle intervention program for diabetes prevention in India: the Kerala diabetes prevention program (K-DPP).印度基于同伴引领的生活方式干预项目预防糖尿病的文化适应性调整:喀拉拉邦糖尿病预防项目(K-DPP)。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 4;17(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4986-0.
8
Progress of the Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme: referrals, uptake and participant characteristics.《更健康的你:国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划:转介、参与率和参与者特征》。
Diabet Med. 2018 Apr;35(4):513-518. doi: 10.1111/dme.13562. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2018; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; and Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program. Final rule.医疗保险计划;2018年医师费率表下支付政策的修订及B部分的其他修订;医疗保险共享节约计划要求;以及医疗保险糖尿病预防计划。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2017 Nov 15;82(219):52976-3371.
10
Long-term Sustainability of Diabetes Prevention Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.长期可持续性的糖尿病预防方法:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1808-1817. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6040.