Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Room 428, Baltimore, MD 21205. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Oct 1;26(10):e319-e326. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.88505.
To assess the association of geriatric syndrome risk factors with postacute utilization among hospitalized Medicare patients (both Medicare Advantage [MA] and fee-for-service [FFS] cohorts) and to examine patterns of postacute care for MA and FFS cohorts with high geriatric syndrome risk.
Secondary data analysis using encounter-level data from the State Inpatient Databases (SID) of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.
The sample included 3.1 million Medicare hospitalizations from the Florida SID (2010 to 2014). We used multivariate linear regression to examine the impact of a geriatric syndrome risk measure, assessed as high risk, moderate risk, or nonrisk, on outcomes in MA and FFS cohorts. Outcome measures included postacute destination and inpatient utilization. We then examined if this risk measure was associated with differences in outcomes between MA and FFS cohorts.
Patients with high geriatric syndrome risk (in both MA and FFS cohorts) are less likely to be discharged to home or to home health care. They also have longer inpatient lengths of stay and higher inpatient costs. This risk measure also explains differences in postacute skilled nursing destination between MA and FFS cohorts.
Geriatric syndrome risk factors not only play a role in postacute care and inpatient utilization in MA and FFS cohorts but also explain different utilizations between MA and FFS cohorts. This study's results can be applied to guide discharge planning among a group of high-risk patients and evaluate alternative delivery models for this high-cost, high-need cohort.
评估老年综合征风险因素与住院 Medicare 患者(包括 Medicare Advantage [MA] 和按服务收费 [FFS] 队列)的急性后利用之间的关联,并检查 MA 和 FFS 队列中具有高老年综合征风险的急性后护理模式。
利用医疗保健成本和利用项目的州住院患者数据库(SID)中的入院水平数据进行二次数据分析。
该样本包括来自佛罗里达州 SID(2010 年至 2014 年)的 310 万例 Medicare 住院患者。我们使用多元线性回归来检查老年综合征风险衡量标准(评估为高风险、中风险或无风险)对 MA 和 FFS 队列的结果的影响。结果衡量指标包括急性后目的地和住院利用情况。然后,我们检查了该风险衡量标准是否与 MA 和 FFS 队列之间的结果差异相关。
具有高老年综合征风险(在 MA 和 FFS 队列中)的患者不太可能出院回家或接受家庭保健。他们的住院时间也更长,住院费用也更高。该风险衡量标准还解释了 MA 和 FFS 队列之间急性后熟练护理目的地差异的原因。
老年综合征风险因素不仅在 MA 和 FFS 队列的急性后护理和住院利用中发挥作用,而且还解释了 MA 和 FFS 队列之间的不同利用情况。本研究的结果可用于指导一组高风险患者的出院计划,并评估针对这一高成本、高需求队列的替代交付模式。