Ma Chenjuan, Rajewski Martha, Smith Jamie M
Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY.
School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Med Care. 2024 May 1;62(5):333-345. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001992. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
Home health care serves millions of Americans who are "Aging in Place," including the rapidly growing population of Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees. This study systematically reviewed extant evidence illustrating home health care (HHC) services to MA enrollees.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in 6 electronic databases to identify eligible studies, which resulted in 386 articles. Following 2 rounds of screening, 30 eligible articles were identified. Each study was also assessed independently for study quality using a validated quality assessment checklist.
Of the 30 studies, nearly half (n=13) were recently published between January 1, 2017 - January 6, 2022. Among various issues related to HHC to MA enrollees examined, which were often compared with Traditional Medicare (TM) enrollees, the 2 most studied issues were HHC use rate (including access) and care dosage/intensity. Inconsistencies were common in findings across reviewed studies, with slight variations in the level of inconsistency by studied outcomes. Several critical issues, such as heterogeneity of MA plans, influence of MA-specific features, and program response to policy and quality improvement initiatives, were only examined by 1 or 2 studies. The depth and scope of scientific investigation were also limited by the scale and details available in MA data in addition to other methodological limits.
Wild variations and conflicting findings on HHC to MA beneficiaries exist across studies. More research with rigorous designs and robust MA encounter data is warranted to determine home health care for MA enrollees and the relevant outcomes.
家庭医疗保健服务于数百万“就地养老”的美国人,包括医疗保险优势(MA)参保人数迅速增长的人群。本研究系统回顾了有关向MA参保者提供家庭医疗保健(HHC)服务的现有证据。
在6个电子数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以确定符合条件的研究,共检索到386篇文章。经过两轮筛选,确定了30篇符合条件的文章。还使用经过验证的质量评估清单对每项研究的质量进行了独立评估。
在这30项研究中,近一半(n = 13)是在2017年1月1日至2022年1月6日期间发表的。在研究的与向MA参保者提供HHC相关的各种问题中(这些问题经常与传统医疗保险(TM)参保者进行比较),研究最多的两个问题是HHC使用率(包括可及性)和护理剂量/强度。在所审查的研究中,结果不一致的情况很常见,不同研究结果的不一致程度略有差异。一些关键问题,如MA计划的异质性、MA特定特征的影响以及项目对政策和质量改进举措的反应,仅在1或2项研究中进行了探讨。除了其他方法学限制外,科学调查的深度和范围还受到MA数据的规模和细节的限制。
各项研究中关于向MA受益人群提供HHC的情况存在巨大差异和相互矛盾的结果。需要开展更多设计严谨、拥有丰富MA接触数据的研究,以确定针对MA参保者的家庭医疗保健服务及其相关结果。