Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Health Commun. 2020 Aug 2;25(8):640-649. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1834032. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Flavored e-cigarettes have received high attention across social and news media. How does exposure to e-cigarette flavors across multiple sources in the media environment influence youth e-cigarette perceptions? To address this question, we identified e-cigarette flavor mentions on 24.3 million Twitter posts and 11,691 longform texts (newspapers, broadcast news, and websites) disseminated over 3 years (2014-2017). During the same period, we measured e-cigarette beliefs through a nationally representative randomly sampled rolling survey of 13-26-year-olds (N = 4,470, 1013 days). We estimated the association between flavor-specific content on Twitter and longform sources in the 28 days prior to each survey date and perceptions that e-cigarettes taste good. The interaction of coverage on Twitter and longform sources was significantly associated with more favorable perceptions of e-cigarette taste (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.41); the main effects of each source type were not significant. This study presents a novel approach to evaluating the effects of cross-source coverage in today's complex media landscape and may strengthen claims for media influence on e-cigarette use.
调味电子烟在社会和新闻媒体上受到了高度关注。媒体环境中来自多种来源的电子烟口味暴露会如何影响青少年对电子烟的看法?为了解决这个问题,我们在三年内(2014-2017 年)从 2430 万条 Twitter 帖子和 11691 篇长文(报纸、广播新闻和网站)中识别出电子烟口味提及。同期,我们通过对 13-26 岁青少年进行全国代表性随机抽样滚动调查(N=4470,1013 天)来衡量电子烟的信念。我们估计了在每个调查日期前 28 天内 Twitter 上的特定口味内容和长文来源与电子烟味道好的看法之间的关联。Twitter 和长文来源的报道之间的相互作用与对电子烟味道的更有利看法显著相关(OR=1.21;95%CI,1.04-1.41);每种来源类型的主要影响都不显著。本研究提出了一种评估当今复杂媒体环境中跨源报道影响的新方法,可能会加强对媒体对电子烟使用影响的说法。