Suppr超能文献

应用 Corvis ST 比较原发性开角型青光眼、假性剥脱性青光眼与正常对照者的角膜生物力学。

A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma and healthy controls using Corvis ST.

机构信息

Department of glaucoma, Narayana Nethralaya Eye Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

University Eye Clinic Maastricht, University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 26;15(10):e0241296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241296. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the corneal biomechanical parameters between pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and healthy controls using Corvis ST.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted which included 132 treatment-naïve eyes which underwent Corvis ST. The study cohort comprised of 44 eyes with PXG, 42 eyes with POAG and 46 healthy controls. Corneal biomechanical parameters, which included corneal velocities, length of corneal applanated surface, deformation amplitude (DA), peak distance and radius of curvature, were compared between the groups using analysis of variance models.

RESULTS

The 3 groups were demographically similar. The mean IOP was 15.7 ±3 mmHg in the control group, 21.3 ±5 mmHg in the POAG group and 25.8 ±7 mmHg in the PXG group (p<0.0001). Corneal pachymetry was similar across the 3 groups. Mean DA was significantly lower (p<0.0001) in the PXG group (0.86 ±0.18 mm) compared to the POAG group (0.97 ±0.14mm) and the control group (1.10 ±0.15mm). Corneal velocities were also found to be statistically significantly different between the groups. However, after adjusting for IOP, there was no difference in any of the biomechanical parameters between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

Corneal biomechanical parameters measured on Corvis ST are not different between eyes with PXG, POAG and healthy controls after adjusting for IOP.

摘要

目的

使用 Corvis ST 比较原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、假性剥脱性青光眼(PXG)和健康对照组的角膜生物力学参数。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、横断面研究,纳入了 132 例未经治疗的接受 Corvis ST 检查的患者。研究队列包括 44 只 PXG 眼、42 只 POAG 眼和 46 只健康对照组。使用方差分析模型比较各组的角膜生物力学参数,包括角膜速度、角膜压平表面长度、变形幅度(DA)、峰值距离和曲率半径。

结果

3 组的人口统计学特征相似。对照组的平均眼压为 15.7±3mmHg,POAG 组为 21.3±5mmHg,PXG 组为 25.8±7mmHg(p<0.0001)。3 组的角膜厚度相似。PXG 组的平均 DA 明显低于 POAG 组(0.86±0.18mm)和对照组(1.10±0.15mm)(p<0.0001)。各组的角膜速度也存在统计学差异。然而,在调整眼压后,3 组之间的任何生物力学参数均无差异。

结论

在调整眼压后,PXG、POAG 和健康对照组的 Corvis ST 测量的角膜生物力学参数没有差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach.青光眼的角膜生物力学测量:一种临床方法。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;10(10):1108. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101108.
5
Ocular Biomechanics and Glaucoma.眼部生物力学与青光眼
Vision (Basel). 2023 Apr 23;7(2):36. doi: 10.3390/vision7020036.

本文引用的文献

3
Ocular Findings in Exfoliation Syndrome.干燥综合征的眼部表现。
J Glaucoma. 2018 Jul;27 Suppl 1:S67-S71. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000986.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验