• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用自然语言处理和决策规则早期识别急性胃肠道出血患者。

Early identification of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding using natural language processing and decision rules.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;36(6):1590-1597. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15313. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.15313
PMID:33105045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11874507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Guidelines recommend risk stratification scores in patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), but such scores are uncommonly employed in practice. Automation and deployment of risk stratification scores in real time within electronic health records (EHRs) would overcome a major impediment. This requires an automated mechanism to accurately identify ("phenotype") patients with GIB at the time of presentation. The goal is to identify patients with acute GIB by developing and evaluating EHR-based phenotyping algorithms for emergency department (ED) patients.

METHODS

We specified criteria using structured data elements to create rules for identifying patients and also developed multiple natural language processing (NLP)-based approaches for automated phenotyping of patients, tested them with tenfold cross-validation for 10 iterations (n = 7144) and external validation (n = 2988) and compared them with a standard method to identify patient conditions, the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine. The gold standard for GIB diagnosis was the independent dual manual review of medical records. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value.

RESULTS

A decision rule using GIB-specific terms from ED triage and ED review-of-systems assessment performed better than the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine on internal validation and external validation (positive predictive value = 85% confidence interval:83%-87% vs 69% confidence interval:66%-72%; P < 0.001). The syntax-based NLP algorithm and Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers neural network-based NLP algorithm had similar performance to the structured-data fields decision rule.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated decision rule employing GIB-specific triage and review-of-systems terms can be used to trigger EHR-based deployment of risk stratification models to guide clinical decision making in real time for patients with acute GIB presenting to the ED.

摘要

背景与目的

指南建议对出现胃肠道出血 (GIB) 的患者进行风险分层评分,但此类评分在实践中并不常见。在电子健康记录 (EHR) 中实时自动化和部署风险分层评分将克服一个主要障碍。这需要一种自动机制来在就诊时准确识别 (“表型”) 出现 GIB 的患者。目标是通过开发和评估急诊科 (ED) 患者基于 EHR 的表型算法来识别急性 GIB 患者。

方法

我们使用结构化数据元素指定标准,以创建用于识别患者的规则,还开发了多种基于自然语言处理 (NLP) 的方法来自动对患者进行表型分析,使用十折交叉验证进行了 10 次迭代 (n = 7144) 和外部验证 (n = 2988),并与一种标准方法进行比较,该标准方法用于识别患者的病情,即医学系统命名法。GIB 诊断的金标准是对病历进行独立的双重手动审查。主要结局是阳性预测值。

结果

使用 ED 分诊和 ED 系统评估中特定于 GIB 的术语的决策规则在内部验证和外部验证中的表现优于医学系统命名法 (阳性预测值=85%置信区间:83%-87% vs 69%置信区间:66%-72%;P<0.001)。基于语法的 NLP 算法和基于双向编码器表示的变压器神经网络 (Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers neural network-based) NLP 算法的性能与结构化数据字段决策规则相似。

结论

使用特定于 GIB 的分诊和系统评估术语的自动决策规则可用于触发基于 EHR 的风险分层模型的部署,以实时指导出现急性 GIB 的 ED 患者的临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d694/11874507/03da855ec855/nihms-2057897-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d694/11874507/b1364a14e5eb/nihms-2057897-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d694/11874507/ea5b816a315e/nihms-2057897-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d694/11874507/03da855ec855/nihms-2057897-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d694/11874507/b1364a14e5eb/nihms-2057897-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d694/11874507/ea5b816a315e/nihms-2057897-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d694/11874507/03da855ec855/nihms-2057897-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Early identification of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding using natural language processing and decision rules.利用自然语言处理和决策规则早期识别急性胃肠道出血患者。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;36(6):1590-1597. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15313. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model Compared With Clinical Risk Scores for Gastrointestinal Bleeding.基于电子病历的机器学习模型与临床风险评分对胃肠道出血的验证比较。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Nov;167(6):1198-1212. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.06.030. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
3
Detection of Gastrointestinal Bleeding With Large Language Models to Aid Quality Improvement and Appropriate Reimbursement.利用大语言模型检测胃肠道出血以助力质量改进和合理报销。
Gastroenterology. 2025 Jan;168(1):111-120.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.09.014. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.一个有助于急性胃肠道出血患者管理的决策支持系统。
Artif Intell Med. 2008 Mar;42(3):247-59. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
5
Early identification of suspected serious infection among patients afebrile at initial presentation using neural network models and natural language processing: A development and external validation study in the emergency department.利用神经网络模型和自然语言处理技术在初始表现无发热的患者中早期识别疑似严重感染:急诊中的开发和外部验证研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;80:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
6
Natural Language Processing in a Clinical Decision Support System for the Identification of Venous Thromboembolism: Algorithm Development and Validation.临床决策支持系统中自然语言处理用于识别静脉血栓栓塞症:算法开发与验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 24;25:e43153. doi: 10.2196/43153.
7
Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Model to Identify Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in Real Time to Facilitate Safe Outpatient Management.开发并验证一种自然语言处理模型,实时识别低危肺栓塞,以促进安全的门诊管理。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;84(2):118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.036. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
8
Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.急性心肌梗死患者发生胃肠道出血的危险因素:多中心回顾性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 30;27:e67346. doi: 10.2196/67346.
9
Natural language processing to identify lupus nephritis phenotype in electronic health records.利用自然语言处理技术在电子健康记录中识别狼疮性肾炎表型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 3;22(Suppl 2):348. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02420-7.
10
Prediction of gastrointestinal bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational cohort study (STROBE compliant).接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者胃肠道出血事件的预测:一项观察性队列研究(符合STROBE标准)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21312. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021312.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Scoring Systems Useful in Predicting Mortality from Upper GI Bleeding in Geriatric Patients?评分系统对预测老年患者上消化道出血的死亡率有用吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;15(17):2173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172173.
2
A foundation systematic review of natural language processing applied to gastroenterology & hepatology.一项关于应用于胃肠病学和肝病学的自然语言处理的基础系统评价。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03608-5.
3
Clinical Epidemiology, Etiology, and Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding at a Tertiary Center in Bahrain: A Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmark and Best Practices for Biomedical Knowledge Graph Embeddings.生物医学知识图谱嵌入的基准和最佳实践
Proc Conf Assoc Comput Linguist Meet. 2020 Jul;2020:167-176. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.bionlp-1.18.
2
Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.机器学习模型对上消化道出血的预测能力优于临床风险评分系统的验证。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):160-167. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
Advances in Electronic Phenotyping: From Rule-Based Definitions to Machine Learning Models.
巴林一家三级医疗中心上消化道出血的临床流行病学、病因及转归:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 8;17(1):e77133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77133. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model Compared With Clinical Risk Scores for Gastrointestinal Bleeding.基于电子病历的机器学习模型与临床风险评分对胃肠道出血的验证比较。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Nov;167(6):1198-1212. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.06.030. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
5
Using natural language processing in emergency medicine health service research: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在急诊医学卫生服务研究中使用自然语言处理:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;31(7):696-706. doi: 10.1111/acem.14937. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.大型语言模型在变革急诊医学中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 10;12:e53787. doi: 10.2196/53787.
7
Machine learning in the assessment and management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding.机器学习在急性胃肠道出血评估与管理中的应用
BMJ Med. 2024 Feb 19;3(1):e000699. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000699. eCollection 2024.
8
Doctors Identify Hemorrhage Better during Chart Review when Assisted by Artificial Intelligence.医生在接受人工智能辅助进行图表审查时,能够更好地识别出血情况。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):743-751. doi: 10.1055/a-2121-8380. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
9
Reconciling Allergy Information in the Electronic Health Record After a Drug Challenge Using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理技术在药物激发试验后核对电子健康记录中的过敏信息。
Front Allergy. 2022 May 10;3:904923. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.904923. eCollection 2022.
10
Deep learning conventional learning algorithms for clinical prediction in Crohn's disease: A proof-of-concept study.深度学习与传统学习算法在克罗恩病临床预测中的比较:一项概念验证研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 14;27(38):6476-6488. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6476.
电子表型分析的进展:从基于规则的定义到机器学习模型
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2018 Jul;1:53-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013315. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.机器学习预测急性胃肠道出血患者的结局:系统评价。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Aug;64(8):2078-2087. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05645-z. Epub 2019 May 4.
5
Natural language processing and machine learning algorithm to identify brain MRI reports with acute ischemic stroke.自然语言处理和机器学习算法识别急性缺血性脑卒中的脑部 MRI 报告。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212778. eCollection 2019.
6
Identifying dementia outcomes in UK Biobank: a validation study of primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data.在英国生物样本库中识别痴呆症结局:初级保健、住院和死亡率数据的验证研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;34(6):557-565. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00499-1. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
7
Effect of vocabulary mapping for conditions on phenotype cohorts.条件词汇映射对表型队列的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Dec 1;25(12):1618-1625. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy124.
8
Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2018.美国胃肠道、肝脏和胰腺疾病的负担和成本:2018 年更新。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):254-272.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.063. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.生物医学自然语言处理中词嵌入的比较。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Nov;87:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Identifying dementia cases with routinely collected health data: A systematic review.利用常规健康数据识别痴呆病例:系统评价。
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Aug;14(8):1038-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 3.