1242 Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
11056 Chicago Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2021 Jan/Feb;136(1):88-96. doi: 10.1177/0033354920966064. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
Widespread global transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), continues. Many questions remain about asymptomatic or atypical infections and transmission dynamics. We used comprehensive contact tracing of the first 2 confirmed patients in Illinois with COVID-19 and serologic SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing to determine whether contacts had evidence of undetected COVID-19.
Contacts were eligible for serologic follow-up if previously tested for COVID-19 during an initial investigation or had greater-risk exposures. Contacts completed a standardized questionnaire during the initial investigation. We classified exposure risk as high, medium, or low based on interactions with 2 index patients and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Serologic testing used a SARS-CoV-2 spike enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on serum specimens collected from participants approximately 6 weeks after initial exposure to either index patient. The 2 index patients provided serum specimens throughout their illness. We collected data on demographic, exposure, and epidemiologic characteristics.
Of 347 contacts, 110 were eligible for serologic follow-up; 59 (17% of all contacts) enrolled. Of these, 53 (90%) were health care personnel and 6 (10%) were community contacts. Seventeen (29%) reported high-risk exposures, 15 (25%) medium-risk, and 27 (46%) low-risk. No participant had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The 2 index patients had antibodies detected at dilutions >1:6400 within 4 weeks after symptom onset.
In serologic follow-up of the first 2 known patients in Illinois with COVID-19, we found no secondary transmission among tested contacts. Lack of seroconversion among these contacts adds to our understanding of conditions (ie, use of PPE) under which SARS-CoV-2 infections might not result in transmission and demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is a useful tool to verify epidemiologic findings.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2),即导致 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的病毒,在全球范围内持续广泛传播。关于无症状或非典型感染和传播动态,仍存在许多问题。我们使用对伊利诺伊州前 2 例 COVID-19 确诊患者的全面接触者追踪,并进行血清 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测,以确定接触者是否有未被发现的 COVID-19 证据。
如果在初次调查期间之前对接触者进行了 COVID-19 检测,或者有更高风险的暴露,那么接触者就有资格进行血清学随访。接触者在初次调查期间完成了一份标准化问卷。我们根据与 2 名指数患者的互动以及个人防护设备(PPE)的使用情况,将暴露风险分为高、中、低。血清学检测使用 SARS-CoV-2 刺突酶联免疫吸附试验,对初次接触任一指数患者后约 6 周采集的参与者血清样本进行检测。这 2 名指数患者在患病期间提供了血清样本。我们收集了人口统计学、暴露和流行病学特征方面的数据。
在 347 名接触者中,有 110 名有资格进行血清学随访;59 名(所有接触者的 17%)入组。其中,53 名(90%)为卫生保健人员,6 名(10%)为社区接触者。17 名(29%)报告有高风险暴露,15 名(25%)为中风险,27 名(46%)为低风险。没有参与者有 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的证据。这 2 名指数患者在症状出现后 4 周内,抗体的稀释度>1:6400。
在对伊利诺伊州前 2 例已知 COVID-19 患者的血清学随访中,我们没有发现检测接触者之间的二次传播。这些接触者未发生血清转化,这增加了我们对某些情况下(即使用 PPE)SARS-CoV-2 感染可能不会导致传播的认识,并表明 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测是验证流行病学发现的有用工具。