Palmans Hugo, Medin Joakim, Trnková Petra, Vatnitsky Stanislav
MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Med Phys. 2020 Dec;47(12):6531-6539. doi: 10.1002/mp.14554. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
The local depth dose gradient and the displacement correction factor for Farmer-type ionization chambers are quantified for reference dosimetry at shallow depth in single-layer scanned proton fields.
Integrated radial profiles as a function of depth (IRPDs) measured at three proton therapy centers were smoothed by polynomial fits. The local relative depth dose gradient at measurement depths from 1 to 5 cm were derived from the derivatives of those fits. To calculate displacement correction factors, the best estimate of the effective point of measurement was derived from reviewing experimental and theoretical determinations reported in the literature. Displacement correction factors for the use of Farmer-type ionization chambers with their reference point (at the center of the cavity volume) positioned at the measurement depth were derived as a ratio of IRPD values at the measurement depth and at the effective point of measurement.
Depth dose gradients are as low as 0.1-0.4% per mm at measurement depths from 1 to 5 cm in the highest clinical proton energies (with residual ranges higher than 15 cm) and increase to 1% per mm at a residual range of 4 cm and become larger than 3% per mm for residual ranges lower than 2 cm. The literature review shows that the effective point of measurement of Farmer-type ionization chambers is, similarly as for carbon ion beams, located 0.75 times the cavity radius closer to the beam origin as the center of the cavity. If a maximum displacement correction of 2% is deemed acceptable to be included in calculated beam quality correction factors, Farmer-type ICs can be used at measurements depths from 1 to 5 cm for which the residual range is 4 cm or larger. If one wants to use the same beam quality correction factors as applicable to the conventional measurement point for scattered beams, located at the center of the SOBP, the relative standard uncertainty on the assumption that the displacement correction factor is unity can be kept below 0.5% for measurement depths of at least 2 cm and for residual ranges of 15 cm or higher.
The literature review confirmed that for proton beams the effective point of measurement of Farmer-type ionization chambers is located 0.75 times the cavity radius closer to the beam origin as the center of the cavity. Based on the findings in this work, three options can be recommended for reference dosimetry of scanned proton beams using Farmer-type ionization chambers: (a) positioning the effective point of measurement at the measurement depth, (b) positioning the reference point at the measurement depth and applying a displacement correction factor, and (c) positioning the reference point at the measurement depth without applying a displacement correction factor. Based on limiting the acceptable uncertainty on the gradient correction factor to 0.5% and the maximum deviation of the displacement perturbation correction factor from unity to 2%, the first two options can be allowed for residual ranges of at least 4 cm while the third option only for residual ranges of at least 15 cm.
对Farmer型电离室的局部深度剂量梯度和位移校正因子进行量化,用于单层扫描质子场浅深度处的参考剂量测定。
对在三个质子治疗中心测量的作为深度函数的积分径向剖面(IRPDs)进行多项式拟合平滑处理。从这些拟合的导数中得出测量深度在1至5厘米时的局部相对深度剂量梯度。为了计算位移校正因子,通过回顾文献中报道的实验和理论测定,得出测量有效点的最佳估计值。将Farmer型电离室的参考点(位于腔体积中心)置于测量深度时的位移校正因子,作为测量深度处和测量有效点处IRPD值的比值得出。
在最高临床质子能量(剩余射程高于15厘米)下,测量深度在1至5厘米时,深度剂量梯度低至每毫米0.1 - 0.4%;在剩余射程为4厘米时增加到每毫米1%;在剩余射程低于2厘米时大于每毫米3%。文献综述表明,Farmer型电离室的测量有效点与碳离子束类似,位于离束源比腔中心近0.75倍腔半径处。如果认为计算出的束流质量校正因子中可接受的最大位移校正为2%,则Farmer型电离室可用于剩余射程为4厘米或更大时测量深度在1至5厘米的情况。如果希望使用与适用于散射束常规测量点(位于剂量建成区中心)相同的束流质量校正因子,对于测量深度至少为2厘米且剩余射程为15厘米或更高的情况,假设位移校正因子为1时,相对标准不确定度可保持在0.5%以下。
文献综述证实,对于质子束,Farmer型电离室的测量有效点位于离束源比腔中心近0.75倍腔半径处。基于本工作的发现,对于使用Farmer型电离室进行扫描质子束的参考剂量测定,可推荐三种方案:(a)将测量有效点置于测量深度;(b)将参考点置于测量深度并应用位移校正因子;(c)将参考点置于测量深度但不应用位移校正因子。基于将梯度校正因子的可接受不确定度限制在0.5%,以及位移微扰校正因子与1的最大偏差限制在2%,前两种方案可用于剩余射程至少为4厘米的情况,而第三种方案仅适用于剩余射程至少为15厘米的情况。