Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Medical Radiation Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Sep 29;67(19). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9172.
. To review the currently available data on beam quality correction factors,kQ,for ionization chambers in clinical proton beams and derive their current best estimates for the updated recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 Code of Practice.. The reviewed data come from 20 publications from whichkQvalues can be derived either directly from calorimeter measurements, indirectly from comparison with other chambers or from Monte Carlo calculated overall chamber factors,fQ.For cylindrical ionization chambers, a distinction is made between data obtained in the centre of a spread-out Bragg peak and those obtained in the plateau region of single-energy fields. For the latter, the effect of depth dose gradients has to be considered. To this end an empirical model for previously published displacement correction factors for single-layer scanned beams was established, while for unmodulated scattered beams experimental data were used. From all the data, chamber factors,fQ,and chamber perturbation correction factors,pQ,were then derived and analysed.. The analysis showed that except for the beam quality dependence of the water-to-air mass stopping power ratio and, for cylindrical ionization chambers in unmodulated beams, of the displacement correction factor, there is no remaining beam quality dependence of the chamber perturbation correction factorspQ.Based on this approach, average values of the beam quality independent part of the perturbation factors were derived to calculatekQvalues consistent with the data in the literature.. The resulting data from this analysis are current best estimates ofkQvalues for modulated scattered beams and single-layer scanned beams used in proton therapy. Based on this, a single set of harmonized values is derived to be recommended in the update of IAEA TRS-398.
. 回顾目前关于临床质子束中电离室束流品质修正因子 kQ 的可用数据,并为 IAEA TRS-398 实践规程的最新建议推导出其当前的最佳估计值。. 所审查的数据来自 20 篇出版物,从中可以直接从量热计测量、间接从与其他电离室的比较或从蒙特卡罗计算的整体电离室因子 fQ 推导出 kQ 值。对于圆柱形电离室,区分了在扩展布拉格峰中心获得的数据和在单能场的平台区域获得的数据。对于后者,必须考虑深度剂量梯度的影响。为此,建立了先前发表的用于单层扫描束的位移修正因子的经验模型,而对于未调制散射束则使用实验数据。然后,从所有数据中推导出电离室因子 fQ 和电离室扰动修正因子 pQ,并对其进行分析。. 分析表明,除了水-空气质量阻止本领的束流品质依赖性以及在未调制束中的圆柱形电离室的位移修正因子之外,电离室扰动修正因子 pQ 没有剩余的束流品质依赖性。基于此方法,推导出扰动因子无束流品质依赖性部分的平均值,以计算与文献数据一致的 kQ 值。. 该分析得出的结果是调制散射束和质子治疗中使用的单层扫描束的 kQ 值的当前最佳估计值。在此基础上,推导出一组单一的协调值,以在 IAEA TRS-398 的更新中推荐使用。