Suppr超能文献

颈痛患者的康复预期并不能预测手法治疗的效果。

Recovery expectations of neck pain patients do not predict treatments outcome in manual therapy.

机构信息

Institute for Master Education in Manual Therapy, SOMT, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):18518. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74962-5.

Abstract

Patient recovery expectations can predict treatment outcome. Little is known about the association of patient recovery expectations on treatment outcome in patients with neck pain consulting a manual therapist. This study evaluates the predictive value of recovery expectations in neck pain patients consulting manual therapists in the Netherlands. The primary outcome measure 'recovery' is defined as 'reduction in pain and perceived improvement'. A prospective cohort study a total of 1195 neck pain patients. Patients completed the Patient Expectancies List (PEL) at baseline (3 item questionnaire, score range from 3 to 12), functional status (NDI), the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) for recovery (7-points Likert scale) post treatment and pain scores (NRS) at baseline and post treatment. The relationship between recovery expectancy and recovery (dichotomized GPE scores) was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Patients generally reported high recovery expectations on all three questions of the PEL (mean sumscores ranging from 11.3 to 11.6). When adjusted for covariates the PEL sum-score did not predict recovery (explained variance was 0.10 for the total PEL). Separately, the first question of the PEL showed predictive potential (OR 3.7; 95%CI 0.19-73.74) for recovery, but failed to reach statistical significance. In this study patient recovery expectations did not predict treatment outcome. Variables predicting recovery were recurrence and duration of pain. The precise relationship between patient recovery expectations and outcome is complex and still inconclusive. Research on patient expectancy would benefit from more consistent use of theoretical expectancy and outcome models.

摘要

患者的康复预期可以预测治疗结果。然而,对于接受手法治疗的颈痛患者,其康复预期与治疗结果之间的关联知之甚少。本研究评估了荷兰接受手法治疗的颈痛患者的康复预期对治疗结果的预测价值。主要结局指标“康复”定义为“疼痛减轻和感知改善”。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,共纳入 1195 例颈痛患者。患者在基线时(3 项问卷,评分范围为 3 至 12)、功能状态(NDI)、治疗后恢复的总体感知效果(GPE,7 点 Likert 量表)以及基线和治疗后疼痛评分(NRS)时完成了患者期望清单(PEL)。通过逻辑回归分析评估康复预期与康复(二分 GPE 评分)之间的关系。患者普遍报告了 PEL 所有三个问题的高康复预期(平均总分范围为 11.3 至 11.6)。调整协变量后,PEL 总分并未预测康复(PEL 总分的解释方差为 0.10)。此外,PEL 的第一个问题显示出预测潜力(OR 3.7;95%CI 0.19-73.74),但未达到统计学意义。在这项研究中,患者的康复预期不能预测治疗结果。预测康复的变量是疼痛的复发和持续时间。患者康复预期与结局之间的关系复杂且尚无定论。对患者期望的研究将受益于更一致地使用理论期望和结局模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验