• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鲁汶强迫性侵入量表在两种不同文化中的效度验证与测量不变性

Validation and Measurement Invariance of the Leuven Obsessional Intrusions Inventory in Two Different Cultures.

作者信息

Ozcanli Fulya, Claes Laurence, Ceulemans Eva, Hermans Dirk, Mesquita Batja

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BE.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BE.

出版信息

Psychol Belg. 2020 Oct 16;60(1):347-361. doi: 10.5334/pb.537.

DOI:10.5334/pb.537
PMID:33117552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7566505/
Abstract

Obsessions - recurrent unwanted intrusive thoughts - are one of the two pillars of the Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Although OCD has been reported across many different cultures, research on these cultural variations is hampered by the lack of cross-culturally sound instruments to assess intrusive thoughts. The aim of the current study is to investigate the psychometric properties of the recently developed Leuven Obsessional Intrusions Instrument (LOII) in two different cultural contexts. Turkish (N = 663) and Belgian (N = 496) participants were sampled from non-clinical student populations. Results from confirmatory factor analyses yielded a shortened version of the LOII (i.e., LOII-R) with a four-factor solution - aggressive, sexual, and contamination intrusions, and 'just-right' doubts - as the best fitting model across both cultures. The model met most criteria for strong measurement invariance, and proved to be both valid and reliable. The results of this study suggest that the LOII-R is a good candidate for cross-cultural studies on obsessional intrusions.

摘要

强迫观念——反复出现的不必要的侵入性想法——是强迫症(OCD)的两大支柱之一。尽管在许多不同文化中都有强迫症的报道,但由于缺乏跨文化适用的工具来评估侵入性想法,对这些文化差异的研究受到了阻碍。本研究的目的是在两种不同文化背景下,调查最近开发的鲁汶强迫性侵入量表(LOII)的心理测量特性。土耳其(N = 663)和比利时(N = 496)的参与者来自非临床学生群体。验证性因素分析的结果产生了一个简化版的LOII(即LOII-R),其具有一个四因素模型——攻击性、性和污染侵入以及“恰到好处”的怀疑——作为两种文化中最合适的模型。该模型符合强测量不变性的大多数标准,并且被证明是有效且可靠的。本研究结果表明,LOII-R是用于强迫性侵入跨文化研究的一个很好的候选工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a4/7566505/89c0a7b57d0c/pb-60-1-537-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a4/7566505/89c0a7b57d0c/pb-60-1-537-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a4/7566505/89c0a7b57d0c/pb-60-1-537-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation and Measurement Invariance of the Leuven Obsessional Intrusions Inventory in Two Different Cultures.鲁汶强迫性侵入量表在两种不同文化中的效度验证与测量不变性
Psychol Belg. 2020 Oct 16;60(1):347-361. doi: 10.5334/pb.537.
2
Psychometric Properties of a Short Korean Version of the Revised Obsessive Intrusion Inventory.修订版强迫性侵入量表韩语简短版的心理测量特性
Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jul;12(3):288-94. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.3.288. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
3
The appraisal of intrusive thoughts in relation to obsessional-compulsive symptoms.与强迫症状相关的侵入性思维评估。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(2):98-110. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2010.545072. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
4
Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: from normal cognitive intrusions to clinical obsessions.强迫症中的症状维度:从正常认知入侵到临床强迫观念。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 May;25(4):474-82. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
5
Linking obsessions to morality: A cross-cultural study among Turkish and Belgian university students.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;61(6):905-914. doi: 10.1177/13634615241277580. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
6
Fear of Self and Unacceptable Thoughts in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.强迫症中的自我恐惧与不可接受的想法
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 May;23(3):226-35. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1950. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
7
Thematic Content Analysis of Repugnant Intrusions in Highly Religious Canadian and Turkish Samples.对高度虔诚的加拿大和土耳其样本中令人厌恶的侵扰进行的主题内容分析。
J Relig Health. 2024 Aug;63(4):2821-2846. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01747-1. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
8
[Washing, checking, and rumination: are the belief domains, obsessions and compulsions specific to OCD subtypes?].[洗涤、检查与沉思:信念领域、强迫观念及强迫行为是否为强迫症亚型所特有?]
Encephale. 2010 Feb;36(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.003. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
9
Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of an Instrument for the Measurement of Obsessional Dissociative Experiences: The Van Obsessional Dissociation Questionnaire (VOD-Q).Obsessional 解离体验测量工具的开发及初步心理计量学特性:Van obsessional Dissociation Questionnaire (VOD-Q)。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):549-568. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9555-2.
10
If it is absurd, then why do you do it? The richer the obsessional experience, the more compelling the compulsion.如果这是荒谬的,那你为什么要这样做呢?强迫观念越丰富,冲动就越强烈。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Mar;25(2):210-216. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2155. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Obsessions Across Two Cultures: A Comparison of Belgian and Turkish Non-clinical Samples.两种文化中的强迫观念:比利时和土耳其非临床样本的比较
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00657. eCollection 2019.
2
Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety.结构方程模型的样本量要求:功效、偏差和解的恰当性评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2013 Dec;76(6):913-934. doi: 10.1177/0013164413495237.
3
What's hampering measurement invariance: detecting non-invariant items using clusterwise simultaneous component analysis.
阻碍测量不变性的因素:使用聚类同时成分分析检测非不变项目。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 20;5:604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00604. eCollection 2014.
4
The relevance of analogue studies for understanding obsessions and compulsions.模拟研究对于理解强迫观念和强迫行为的相关性。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Apr;34(3):206-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
5
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
6
Responses to mental health stigma questions: the importance of social desirability and data collection method.对心理健康污名问题的回应:社会期望和数据收集方法的重要性。
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;57(3):152-60. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700304.
7
Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: from normal cognitive intrusions to clinical obsessions.强迫症中的症状维度:从正常认知入侵到临床强迫观念。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 May;25(4):474-82. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
8
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale across four racial/ethnic groups.四个种族/族群群体中的耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表的因子结构和测量不变性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Oct;24(7):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 24.
9
Psychometric characteristics of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 and metacognitive predictors of worry and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a Turkish sample.土耳其样本中宾州忧虑问卷和元认知问卷-30的心理测量特征以及忧虑和强迫症状的元认知预测因素
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):424-39. doi: 10.1002/cpp.589.
10
What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research.如果我们将筷子与叉子进行比较会怎样?在跨文化研究中进行不恰当比较的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1005-18. doi: 10.1037/a0013193.