• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科肿瘤学研究:让家长参与以加强研究过程、成果及知识转化。

Research in pediatric oncology: Engaging parents to strengthen research processes, outcomes and knowledge translation.

作者信息

Bally Jill M G, Mcharo Solomon K

机构信息

University of Saskatchewan, College of Nursing.

出版信息

Can Oncol Nurs J. 2020 Jul 1;30(3):220-222. eCollection 2020 Summer.

PMID:33118965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7583574/
Abstract

Childhood cancer is the most common disease-related cause of death in Canadian children aged 0-14 years, with more than 1,000 new diagnoses every year (Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee, 2019). Treatment for childhood cancers requires complex, intensive, and lengthy regimens, often lasting years. Each new diagnosis marks tremendous upheaval in the lives of the child and their family, and an opportunity for nurses in pediatric oncology to make a difference. However, to best intervene, it is crucial to understand the experiences and needs of parental caregivers who have children in treatment for cancer. Patient Oriented Research is one way to bring together patients, family members, researchers, healthcare providers, and decision-makers to actively collaborate, understand best practices, and create transformational positive change in pediatric oncology.

摘要

儿童癌症是加拿大0至14岁儿童中与疾病相关的最常见死因,每年有超过1000例新确诊病例(加拿大癌症统计咨询委员会,2019年)。儿童癌症的治疗需要复杂、密集且漫长的疗程,通常持续数年。每一例新确诊病例都给患儿及其家庭的生活带来巨大动荡,也为儿科肿瘤护理人员提供了发挥作用的机会。然而,为了进行最佳干预,了解孩子正在接受癌症治疗的父母护理人员的经历和需求至关重要。以患者为导向的研究是一种让患者、家庭成员、研究人员、医疗保健提供者和决策者积极合作、了解最佳实践并在儿科肿瘤领域创造变革性积极变化的方式。

相似文献

1
Research in pediatric oncology: Engaging parents to strengthen research processes, outcomes and knowledge translation.儿科肿瘤学研究:让家长参与以加强研究过程、成果及知识转化。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2020 Jul 1;30(3):220-222. eCollection 2020 Summer.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
An Evaluation of Parents' Experiences of Patient Engagement in Research to Develop a Digital Knowledge Translation Tool: Protocol for a Multi-Method Study.一项关于家长参与开发数字知识转化工具的研究中患者参与体验的评估:一项多方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(8):e19108. doi: 10.2196/19108.
6
Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home.带着痛苦与充实生活:家中有使用呼吸机辅助的孩子的家庭的道德体验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e48-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0789.
7
Knowledge Exchange and Discovery in the Age of Social Media: The Journey From Inception to Establishment of a Parent-Led Web-Based Research Advisory Community for Childhood Disability.社交媒体时代的知识交流与发现:从创立到建立一个由家长主导的基于网络的儿童残疾研究咨询社区的历程。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 11;18(11):e293. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5994.
8
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
9
Clinical cancer advances 2011: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.临床肿瘤进展 2011:美国临床肿瘤学会癌症进展年度报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 1;30(1):88-109. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1919. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Canada's First Experience With a Patient-Adjudicated Cancer Research Grant Competition: A Case Study.加拿大首次患者评审癌症研究资助竞赛的经历:一个案例研究。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Sep 15;9:23743735221123424. doi: 10.1177/23743735221123424. eCollection 2022.
2
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining Patient-Oriented Research for the Average Person (and Potential Research Partner).为普通人(以及潜在研究伙伴)定义以患者为导向的研究。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2019 Jan 28;6(1):4-6. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1697. eCollection 2019 Winter.
2
Partnering with families of children with medical complexity to evaluate interventions.与患有复杂疾病儿童的家庭合作以评估干预措施。
CMAJ. 2018 Nov 7;190(Suppl):S24-S25. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180372.
3
Engaging parents to research childhood interventions aimed at preventing common health problems.让家长参与研究旨在预防常见健康问题的儿童干预措施。
CMAJ. 2018 Nov 7;190(Suppl):S22-S23. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180323.
4
Moving patient-oriented research forward: thoughts from the next generation of knowledge translation researchers.推动以患者为导向的研究向前发展:下一代知识转化研究人员的思考。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Aug 1;4:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0110-6. eCollection 2018.
5
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.面向患者、医疗保健提供者、决策者和研究人员的健康患者导向研究能力(PORCH):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0762-1.
6
Patient and Researcher Engagement in Health Research: A Parent's Perspective.患者与研究者参与健康研究:一位家长的视角
Pediatrics. 2017 Sep;140(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4127.
7
Patient- and community-oriented research: How is authentic engagement identified in grant applications?以患者和社区为导向的研究:如何在资助申请中识别真正的参与?
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Jan;63(1):74-76.
8
How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices.我们应当如何以及为何让家长作为共同研究者参与健康研究?对当前实践做法的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):543-554. doi: 10.1111/hex.12490. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
10
Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice.揭示参与式研究的益处:对健康研究和实践的现实主义综述的启示。
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):311-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x.