Suppr超能文献

残疾青少年在电子烟和烟草使用方面的差异。

Disparities in E-Cigarette and Tobacco Use Among Adolescents With Disabilities.

机构信息

Oregon Health and Science University, Oregon Office on Disability and Health, Portland, Oregon.

OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 29;17:E135. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200161.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2019, nearly 30% of US high-school students reported current (past 30 day) e-cigarette use. Adolescents with disabilities are consistently more likely to smoke cigarettes compared with their nondisabled peers, yet little is known about their use of other forms of tobacco, including e-cigarettes. We compared the prevalence of tobacco use (e-cigarettes, cigarettes, little cigars, large cigars, hookahs, and smokeless tobacco) among high school students with at least 1 disability to those without disability.

METHODS

Data were from the 2015 and 2017 Oregon Healthy Teens survey, a statewide representative sample of 11th-grade students. We estimated the prevalence of current (past 30 day) tobacco use by product type and disability status (yes or no). We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios measuring the association between disability status and current tobacco use, by product: 1) combustible products only, 2) e-cigarettes only, and 3) dual use of combustibles and e-cigarettes.

RESULTS

Students with disabilities were more likely to use a variety of tobacco products compared with their nondisabled peers, including cigarettes (12.3% vs 5.4%), little cigars (7.0% vs 5.4%), hookahs (6.2% vs 3.8%), and e-cigarettes (18.3% vs 12.3%). In adjusted models, students with a disability were more likely to report using combustibles only (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.31-1.84), e-cigarettes only (aPR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.16-1.59), or dual use (aPR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.29-1.80) compared with nondisabled students.

CONCLUSION

Effective tobacco control programs should target populations with the greatest burden of tobacco use. Results suggest that tobacco prevention and reduction efforts should explicitly include adolescents with disabilities and employ accommodations that support their participation in program activities.

摘要

简介

2019 年,近 30%的美国高中生报告称目前(过去 30 天)使用电子烟。与无残疾的同龄人相比,残疾青少年吸烟的可能性始终更高,但人们对他们使用其他形式的烟草,包括电子烟的情况知之甚少。我们比较了至少有一种残疾的高中生与无残疾高中生使用烟草的流行率(电子烟、香烟、小雪茄、大雪茄、水烟和无烟烟草)。

方法

数据来自 2015 年和 2017 年俄勒冈州健康青少年调查,这是一项全州范围内 11 年级学生的代表性样本。我们按产品类型和残疾状况(是或否)估计了目前(过去 30 天)使用烟草的流行率。我们使用多变量泊松回归估计了残疾状况与当前使用烟草产品(1)可燃产品、2)电子烟和 3)可燃和电子烟同时使用之间的关联的流行率比。

结果

与无残疾的同龄人相比,残疾学生更有可能使用各种烟草产品,包括香烟(12.3%比 5.4%)、小雪茄(7.0%比 5.4%)、水烟(6.2%比 3.8%)和电子烟(18.3%比 12.3%)。在调整后的模型中,残疾学生更有可能报告仅使用可燃产品(调整后的流行率比 [aPR],1.55;95%置信区间 [CI],1.31-1.84)、仅使用电子烟(aPR,1.36;95%CI,1.16-1.59)或同时使用两者(aPR,1.52;95%CI,1.29-1.80),而不是无残疾的学生。

结论

有效的烟草控制计划应针对烟草使用负担最重的人群。结果表明,烟草预防和减少工作应明确包括残疾青少年,并采取支持他们参与项目活动的适应措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/593d/7665574/98d31469e34d/PCD-17-E135s01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验