• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症和双相情感障碍中社会功能领域的网络结构:一项初步研究。

Network Structures of Social Functioning Domains in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: A Preliminary Study.

作者信息

Ryu Seunghyong, Lee Hyeongrae, Lee Dong-Kyun, Nam Hee Jung, Chung Young-Chul, Kim Sung-Wan

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

Department of Mental Health Research, National Center for Mental Health, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020 Nov 30;18(4):571-579. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.4.571.

DOI:10.9758/cpn.2020.18.4.571
PMID:33124589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7609205/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

: This study used network analyses to examine network structures reflecting interactions between specific domains of social functioning in schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD).

METHODS

We used the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) to assess six domains of social functioning ('cognition', 'mobility', 'self-care', 'getting along', 'life activities', and 'participation') in 143 patients with SZ, 81 patients with BD, and 106 healthy subjects. We constructed regularized partial correlation networks, estimated network centrality and edge strength, tested network stability, and compared SZ and BD network structures.

RESULTS

Patients with SZ showed a significantly higher level of functional disability than patients with BD. In the networks we constructed, 'cognition' was the most central domain of social functioning in both SZ and BD. The 'cognition' domain was primarily associated with the 'getting along' domain in the SZ network and the 'life activities' domain in the BD network. We found no significant group-level differences in network structures for SZ vs. BD.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that cognition may play a pivotal role in social functioning in both SZ and BD. In addition, domains of social functioning in SZ and BD have similar network structures despite the higher level of disability in SZ compared to BD.

摘要

目的

本研究采用网络分析方法,以检验反映精神分裂症(SZ)和双相情感障碍(BD)社会功能特定领域之间相互作用的网络结构。

方法

我们使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)对143例SZ患者、81例BD患者和106名健康受试者的六个社会功能领域(“认知”、“移动性”、“自我护理”、“相处”、“生活活动”和“参与”)进行评估。我们构建了正则化偏相关网络,估计网络中心性和边强度,测试网络稳定性,并比较SZ和BD的网络结构。

结果

SZ患者的功能残疾水平显著高于BD患者。在我们构建的网络中,“认知”是SZ和BD中社会功能最核心的领域。在SZ网络中,“认知”领域主要与“相处”领域相关;在BD网络中,“认知”领域主要与“生活活动”领域相关。我们发现SZ与BD的网络结构在组水平上无显著差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,认知可能在SZ和BD的社会功能中起关键作用。此外,尽管SZ的残疾水平高于BD,但SZ和BD的社会功能领域具有相似的网络结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/df6661d107d8/CPN-18-571-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/e62419ede134/CPN-18-571-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/04b24fc9d6b5/CPN-18-571-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/568448fff25e/CPN-18-571-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/df6661d107d8/CPN-18-571-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/e62419ede134/CPN-18-571-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/04b24fc9d6b5/CPN-18-571-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/568448fff25e/CPN-18-571-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64b/7609205/df6661d107d8/CPN-18-571-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Network Structures of Social Functioning Domains in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: A Preliminary Study.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍中社会功能领域的网络结构:一项初步研究。
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020 Nov 30;18(4):571-579. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.4.571.
2
Social cognition and psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Theory of mind as a key to understand schizophrenia dysfunction.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的社会认知和心理社会功能:以心智理论理解精神分裂症功能障碍的关键。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Dec;77:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.08.483. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Hostile attributions in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia contribute to poor social functioning.双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中的敌意归因会导致社会功能不良。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Jun;131(6):472-82. doi: 10.1111/acps.12399. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
4
Adaptive Associations between Social Cognition and Emotion Regulation are Absent in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者的社会认知与情绪调节之间缺乏适应性关联。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 11;3:607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00607. eCollection 2012.
5
Impairments in psychological functioning in refugees and asylum seekers.难民和寻求庇护者的心理功能障碍。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1295031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1295031. eCollection 2023.
6
Shared and distinct structural brain alterations and cognitive features in drug-naïve schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.初发精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者共有的及独特的脑结构改变和认知特征
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Apr;82:103513. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103513. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
7
Eye gaze perception in bipolar disorder: Self-referential bias but intact perceptual sensitivity.双相障碍的眼动感知:自我参照偏向,但感知敏感性完好无损。
Bipolar Disord. 2018 Feb;20(1):60-69. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12564. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
Social cognition moderates the relationship between neurocognition and community functioning in bipolar disorder.社会认知在双相情感障碍的神经认知和社区功能之间的关系中起调节作用。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 1;235:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
9
Alexithymia predicts poorer social and everyday functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.述情障碍可预测精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者的社会功能和日常功能更差。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Network Analysis Reveals Which Negative Symptom Domains Are Most Central in Schizophrenia vs Bipolar Disorder.网络分析揭示了精神分裂症与双相情感障碍中哪些阴性症状领域最为核心。
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Oct 24;45(6):1319-1330. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby168.

引用本文的文献

1
Social functioning in bipolar disorder: investigating the role played by comorbid physical illnesses and cognition.双相情感障碍中的社会功能:探究共病躯体疾病和认知所起的作用。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2025 Mar 21;19:e20240188. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2024-0188. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of Switching to Long-acting Injectable Aripiprazole in Patients with Recent-onset and Chronic Schizophrenia.近期发病及慢性精神分裂症患者换用长效注射用阿立哌唑的疗效
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Feb 28;21(1):57-67. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2023.21.1.57.
3
Network Analysis of the Brief ICF Core Set for Schizophrenia.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.比较网络结构的三个方面:置换检验。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1273-1285. doi: 10.1037/met0000476. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial.网络分析:简要概述与教程
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 Sep 25;6(1):301-328. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283.
3
Correction: Cognitive Performance and Long-Term Social Functioning in Psychotic Disorder: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study.更正:精神病性障碍中的认知表现与长期社会功能:一项三年随访研究。
精神分裂症简要国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合的网络分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 17;13:852132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.852132. eCollection 2022.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0208347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208347. eCollection 2018.
4
Cognitive and functional deficits in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia as a function of the presence and history of psychosis.双相情感障碍和精神分裂症的认知和功能缺陷与精神病的存在和病史有关。
Bipolar Disord. 2018 Nov;20(7):604-613. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12654. Epub 2018 May 18.
5
A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks.正则化偏相关网络教程。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):617-634. doi: 10.1037/met0000167. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Sensitivity of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in Detecting Treatment Effects via Network Analysis.通过网络分析评估阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)在检测治疗效果方面的敏感性。
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;14(11-12):59-67.
7
Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia: Understanding the Biological Correlates and Remediation Strategies.精神分裂症中的认知缺陷:理解生物学关联及补救策略
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):7-17. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.1.7.
8
Longitudinal network structure of depression symptoms and self-efficacy in low-income mothers.低收入母亲抑郁症状与自我效能感的纵向网络结构
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 23;13(1):e0191675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191675. eCollection 2018.
9
The centrality of affective instability and identity in Borderline Personality Disorder: Evidence from network analysis.边缘型人格障碍中情感不稳定和身份认同的核心地位:来自网络分析的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186695. eCollection 2017.
10
Distress, Impairment and the Extended Psychosis Phenotype: A Network Analysis of Psychotic Experiences in an US General Population Sample.苦恼、障碍与扩展的精神病阳性症状:一项美国一般人群样本中精神病性体验的网络分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):768-777. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx134.