Six ways to foster community-engaged research during times of societal crises.
作者信息
Edwards Hillary A, Monroe Dwyan Y, Mullins C Daniel
机构信息
Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Institute for Public Health Innovation, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
出版信息
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Nov;9(16):1101-1104. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0206. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Six ways to foster community-engaged research during times of societal crises.在社会危机时期促进社区参与式研究的六种方法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Nov;9(16):1101-1104. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0206. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Advancing community-engaged research: increasing trustworthiness within community-academic partnerships.推进社区参与式研究：增强社区-学术伙伴关系中的可信度。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Aug;9(11):751-753. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0096. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity-Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship.伙伴关系、流程和结果：以健康公平为重点的社区参与式学术研究的范围元综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:177-199. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
4
Transforming the field: the role of academic health centers in promoting and sustaining equity based community engaged research.转变领域：学术健康中心在促进和维持基于公平的社区参与式研究中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 22;11:1111779. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111779. eCollection 2023.
5
Convergence Despite Divergence: Views of Academic and Community Stakeholders about the Ethics of Community-Engaged Research.尽管存在分歧，但仍有共识：学术和社区利益相关者对社区参与式研究的伦理观点。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Apr 18;29(2):309-316. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.309. eCollection 2019 Spring.
6
Developing relevant assessments of community-engaged research partnerships: A community-based participatory approach to evaluating clinical and health research study teams.制定社区参与研究伙伴关系的相关评估：一种基于社区参与的方法来评估临床和健康研究团队。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 11;7(1):e123. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.544. eCollection 2023.
7
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果：一个映射综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.使用基于社区的参与式研究工作坊模式建立新的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系：癌症疼痛和症状管理健康问责制研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0010.
9
Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative.对社区参与研究伙伴关系的信任：设计多中心临床与转化科学奖（CTSA）计划的方法概述
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):180-192. doi: 10.1177/0163278718819719. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
10
Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers.运用基于社区的参与性研究和组织诊断来描述社区领袖与学术研究人员之间的关系。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Jun 21;7:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.007. eCollection 2017 Sep.
引用本文的文献
1
Establishing a research advisory committee in addictions services with a focus on social needs and social isolation.在成瘾服务领域设立一个以社会需求和社会隔离为重点的研究咨询委员会。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Sep 1;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00770-8.
2
A Proposal for Addressing Bioethical Concerns Along the 10-Step Framework for Community Engagement.关于在社区参与的十步框架中解决生物伦理问题的提案。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70345. doi: 10.1111/hex.70345.
3
Research with Black Communities to Inform Co-Development of a Framework for Anti-Racist Health and Community Programming.针对黑人社区开展研究，为反种族主义健康与社区项目框架的共同开发提供信息。
Can J Nurs Res. 2025 Mar;57(1):82-93. doi: 10.1177/08445621241254883. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
Advancing community-engaged research during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a social network analysis of the trans-LINK Network.推进 COVID-19 大流行期间的社区参与式研究：跨 LINK 网络的社会网络分析的见解。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 11;17(11):e0271397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271397. eCollection 2022.
5
Advancing health equity through integrated biology and population health research: A community-based sample cortisol feasibility and exploratory study.通过整合生物学与人群健康研究促进健康公平：一项基于社区样本的皮质醇可行性与探索性研究。
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2022 May 28;11:100145. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2022.100145. eCollection 2022 Aug.
本文引用的文献
1
Advancing community-engaged research: increasing trustworthiness within community-academic partnerships.推进社区参与式研究：增强社区-学术伙伴关系中的可信度。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Aug;9(11):751-753. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0096. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
Racism and Health in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians.美国的种族主义与健康：美国医师学院政策声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 6;173(7):556-557. doi: 10.7326/M20-4195. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
3
Coronavirus disruptions reverberate through research.新冠疫情给研究工作带来连锁反应。
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1289-1290. doi: 10.1126/science.367.6484.1289.
4
What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: Qualitative survey findings.激励患者和照护者参与健康研究的因素以及参与如何影响他们的生活：定性调查结果。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):328-336. doi: 10.1111/hex.12979. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis: A Case Study in Peripheral Trauma with Implications for Health Professionals.塔斯基吉未治疗梅毒研究：一个对健康专业人员有启示的周边创伤案例研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):322-325. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05309-8. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Whose Responsibility Is It to Dismantle Medical Mistrust? Future Directions for Researchers and Health Care Providers.谁来消除医疗不信任？研究人员和医疗保健提供者的未来方向。
Behav Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;45(2):188-196. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1630357.
7
A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.一项关于非裔美国人、拉丁裔、亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民参与少数族裔研究的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e16-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
8
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.患者和家属参与：理解要素、制定干预措施和政策的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
9
Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research.患者持续参与比较效果研究。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1587-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.442.
10
More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.超越塔斯基吉：理解对参与研究的不信任
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):879-97. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0323.
Zotero 插件