• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在成瘾服务领域设立一个以社会需求和社会隔离为重点的研究咨询委员会。

Establishing a research advisory committee in addictions services with a focus on social needs and social isolation.

作者信息

Moen Marik, Storm Kathena, Young Donald, Haines-Jones Rosalind, Loveland Darin, Kattakuzhy Sarah

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Nursing, 655 W. Lombard St, Baltimore, MD, USA.

University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, PATIENTS Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Sep 1;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00770-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-025-00770-8
PMID:40890851
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12403391/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substance use disorders and unmet social needs (like housing instability and social isolation) are major contributors to U.S. morbidity and mortality. We, patients, staff and researchers, established a research advisory committee (RAC) in an addictions treatment setting to guide research and interventions based on lived-experience.

METHODS

We employed community engaged outreach methods to recruit, train, and establish the RAC, and the 10-Step Framework for Continuous Patient-Engagement to advise research activities, and to initiate our own research.

RESULTS

The RAC contributed unique insights, advising on 12 research projects. We present the process and challenges of establishing the RAC and the benefits to researchers and advisors. We also summarize a case example of a co-developed a research project related to housing stability and social connection.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience shows that establishing a patient/community advisory committee in addictions treatment settings is doable and valuable. Co-authoring this manuscript has allowed us to share how we are shaping research that is more likely to be acceptable to community participants and feasible to implement, especially for populations with addictions and facing barriers related to social determinants of health.

摘要

背景

物质使用障碍和未满足的社会需求(如住房不稳定和社会孤立)是导致美国发病率和死亡率的主要因素。我们患者、工作人员和研究人员在一个成瘾治疗机构设立了一个研究咨询委员会(RAC),以基于实际生活经验指导研究和干预措施。

方法

我们采用社区参与式外展方法来招募、培训和建立RAC,并采用持续患者参与的10步框架为研究活动提供建议,并开展我们自己的研究。

结果

RAC提供了独特的见解,为12个研究项目提供了建议。我们介绍了建立RAC的过程和挑战以及对研究人员和顾问的益处。我们还总结了一个共同开发的与住房稳定性和社会联系相关的研究项目的案例。

结论

这一经验表明,在成瘾治疗机构建立患者/社区咨询委员会是可行且有价值的。共同撰写本手稿使我们能够分享我们如何塑造更有可能为社区参与者所接受且易于实施的研究,特别是针对有成瘾问题且面临与健康社会决定因素相关障碍的人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092b/12403391/1f1d54d8b17c/40900_2025_770_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092b/12403391/51b9e0bb346c/40900_2025_770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092b/12403391/1f8a0d32c30f/40900_2025_770_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092b/12403391/1f1d54d8b17c/40900_2025_770_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092b/12403391/51b9e0bb346c/40900_2025_770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092b/12403391/1f8a0d32c30f/40900_2025_770_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092b/12403391/1f1d54d8b17c/40900_2025_770_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing a research advisory committee in addictions services with a focus on social needs and social isolation.在成瘾服务领域设立一个以社会需求和社会隔离为重点的研究咨询委员会。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Sep 1;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00770-8.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Implementation of link workers in primary care: Synopsis of findings from a realist evaluation.基层医疗中联络人员的实施:现实主义评价的结果概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(27):1-30. doi: 10.3310/KHGT9993.
4
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
5
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
6
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Adapting the QuinteT recruitment intervention (QRI) to optimize the recruitment of ethnic minority groups in clinical trials: insights from workshops with diverse public contributors.调整昆特招募干预措施(QRI)以优化临床试验中少数族裔群体的招募:来自与不同公众参与者举办的研讨会的见解。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 5;186:111922. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111922.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and outcomes of a trauma-informed model of care in residential treatment for substance use.物质使用住院治疗中创伤知情护理模式的可行性及效果
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Feb;169:209571. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209571. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Key ingredients for successful collaboration in health research: perspectives of patient research partners.健康研究中成功合作的关键要素:患者研究伙伴的观点
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 5;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00590-2.
3
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research: A scoping review and thematic analysis.
探索参与精神健康和物质使用研究的影响:范围综述和主题分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1806-1819. doi: 10.1111/hex.13779. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
4
Social determinants of health and premature death among adults in the USA from 1999 to 2018: a national cohort study.1999 年至 2018 年美国成年人健康和早逝的社会决定因素:一项全国队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jun;8(6):e422-e431. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00081-6.
5
Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review.有过精神健康和物质使用经历的人群参与心理健康和物质使用研究的研究证据与实施差距:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 11;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00442-5.
6
Together in care: Lessons learned at the intersection of integrated care, quality improvement, and implementation practice in opioid treatment programs.共同护理:阿片类药物治疗项目中综合护理、质量改进与实施实践交叉领域的经验教训。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Nov 4;3:26334895221135265. doi: 10.1177/26334895221135265. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Applicability of a national strategy for patient-oriented research to people who use(d) substances: a Canadian experience.以患者为导向的研究国家战略对使用(过)药物的人群的适用性:加拿大的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 May 24;8(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00351-z.
8
The relationship between Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) and death from cardiovascular disease or opioid use in counties across the United States (2009-2018).美国各县社会决定因素(SDoH)与心血管疾病或阿片类药物使用导致的死亡之间的关系(2009-2018 年)。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12653-8.
9
What works when: mapping patient and stakeholder engagement methods along the ten-step continuum framework.何时有效:沿着十步连续框架映射患者和利益相关者参与方法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Aug;10(12):999-1017. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0043. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
10
Addressing Social Needs in Health Care Settings: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities for Public Health.在医疗保健环境中满足社会需求:公共卫生的证据、挑战和机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:329-344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102204. Epub 2021 Dec 16.