Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, China.
Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, China.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 30;10(1):18756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75872-2.
We compared a mixed exercise program (i.e., balance exercise plus resistance exercise) with resistance exercise in a single-blind, randomized controlled trial in a post-acute care unit. In total, 60 sarcopenic patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (12-week mixed exercise) and a control group (12-week resistance exercise). The primary outcomes were the change of the Barthel Index and the number of fallers. The intervention group showed a mean increase of 9.5 points on the Barthel Index (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-15.1), while the control group showed a mean increase of 6.3 points (95% CI 2.3-10.4). The mixed exercise program provided a significant benefit over resistance exercise (adjusted mean difference of the change of Barthel Index: 6.8 points; 95% CI 1.4-12.1). The number of fallers was 13.3% and 23.3% in the intervention and control groups, respectively, but the difference was not significant (risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.13, p = 0.506). In conclusion, compared with resistance exercise, the mixed exercise program appears to further improve the activities of daily living and physical performance in our study population. Under the monitoring of experienced physiotherapists, both exercise programs are feasible and safe for this population.
我们在一家康复护理病房进行了一项单盲、随机对照试验,比较了混合运动方案(即平衡运动加阻力运动)和单一的阻力运动。共有 60 名肌肉减少症患者被随机分配到干预组(12 周混合运动)和对照组(12 周阻力运动)。主要结局是 Barthel 指数的变化和跌倒人数。干预组 Barthel 指数平均增加 9.5 分(95%置信区间 3.9-15.1),而对照组平均增加 6.3 分(95%置信区间 2.3-10.4)。混合运动方案比阻力运动提供了显著的益处(Barthel 指数变化的调整平均差异:6.8 分;95%置信区间 1.4-12.1)。干预组和对照组的跌倒人数分别为 13.3%和 23.3%,但差异无统计学意义(风险比 RR 0.89,95%置信区间 0.69-1.13,p=0.506)。总之,与阻力运动相比,混合运动方案似乎进一步改善了我们研究人群的日常生活活动和身体表现。在经验丰富的物理治疗师的监测下,这两个运动方案对该人群都是可行和安全的。