Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 9 Circuit Drive, Box 90328, Durham 27708, North Carolina, United States.
Commonweal, 451 Mesa Road, Bolinas 94924, California, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Nov 17;54(22):14558-14567. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04869. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Over the past few years, human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has garnered increased attention. Research has focused on PFAS exposure via drinking water and diet, and fewer studies have focused on exposure in the indoor environment. To support more research on the latter exposure pathway, we conducted a study to evaluate PFAS in indoor dust. Dust samples from 184 homes in North Carolina and 49 fire stations across the United States and Canada were collected and analyzed for a suite of PFAS using liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) and di-polyfluoroalkyl phosphoric acid esters (diPAPs) were the most prevalent PFAS in both fire station and house dust samples, with medians of approximately 100 ng/g dust or greater. Notably, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonate, perfluorononanoic acid, and 6:2 diPAP were significantly higher in dust from fire stations than from homes, and 8:2 FTOH was significantly higher in homes than in fire stations. Additionally, when comparing our results to earlier published values, we see that perfluoroalkyl acid levels in residential dust appear to decrease over time, particularly for PFOA and PFOS. These results highlight a need to better understand what factors contribute to PFAS levels in dust and to understand how much dust contributes to overall human PFAS exposure.
在过去的几年中,人们对全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 的接触越来越受到关注。研究主要集中在通过饮用水和饮食摄入 PFAS 上,而较少关注室内环境中的暴露。为了支持更多关于后者暴露途径的研究,我们进行了一项研究,评估室内灰尘中的 PFAS。从美国和加拿大的北卡罗来纳州的 184 户家庭和 49 个消防站收集了灰尘样本,并使用液相色谱和气相色谱-质谱法对一系列 PFAS 进行了分析。氟调聚物醇(FTOHs)和二聚多氟烷基磷酸酯(diPAPs)是消防站和房屋灰尘样本中最常见的 PFAS,其中位数约为 100ng/g 灰尘或更高。值得注意的是,全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟己烷磺酸、全氟壬酸和 6:2 diPAP 在消防站的灰尘中显著高于家庭,而 8:2 FTOH 在家庭中的含量显著高于消防站。此外,当将我们的结果与早期发表的数据进行比较时,我们发现住宅灰尘中的全氟烷基酸水平似乎随着时间的推移而降低,特别是对于 PFOA 和 PFOS。这些结果突出表明需要更好地了解哪些因素导致灰尘中的 PFAS 水平,并了解灰尘对人类整体 PFAS 暴露的贡献有多大。