Wallis Dylan James, Miller Kelsey E, DeLuca Nicole M, Thomas Kent, Fuller Chris, McCord James, Cohen Hubal Elaine A, Minucci Jeffrey M
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Participant, 109 T.W Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 109 TW Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Environ Int. 2024 Dec;194:109157. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109157. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are chemicals of concern-they are ubiquitous, persistent, with known and suspected health impacts. Well studied, primary sources of exposure to PFAS are drinking water and food. The presence of PFAS in human tissue of general populations suggests other important exposure sources/pathways. House dust measurements suggest widespread presence of PFAS in residences. Limited studies report paired analyses of PFAS occurrence in indoor media and PFAS concentrations in serum. While paired samples of house dust and blood serum are currently rare, the National Children's Study (NCS) contains paired samples, as well as sociodemographic information, from pregnant people that participated in the study. These archived NCS data and specimens for 104 participants collected between 2009 and 2014 were leveraged and analyzed for 16 commonly measured PFAS. We evaluated PFAS levels in the home, and the relationships between PFAS in dust and serum, and sociodemographic or housing variables. In addition, mechanistic exposure models, and then steady-state serum level models with simple parameters were used to estimate dust contributions of PFAS to serum. The geometric means for the most commonly found PFAS (full names in table 1) in serum were: 4.1 ng/mL for PFOS, 1.1 ng/mL for PFOA, 0.87 ng/mL for PFHxS, 0.16 ng/mL for PFDA. The geometric means of PFAS in dust were: 17 µg/kg for PFOS, 16 µg/kg for PFOA, 9.6 µg/kg for PFDS, 4.5 µg/kg for PFHpA, 4.4 µg/kg for PFNA, 3.9 µg/kg for PFHxS, 3.5 µg/kg for PFDA, 2.3 µg/kg for PFDoA, 2.1 µg/kg for PFUdA. PFOA was significantly correlated in serum and dust as was the sum of all PFAS detected in > 50 % of serum and dust. PFAS in serum was significantly associated with: Higher income, recent renovations, years lived in the home, and educational attainment. PFAS in dust was significantly associated with: Higher participant age, type of home, amount of carpet, educational attainment, higher income, recent renovation, and membership in the military. For some PFAS, 25 % of the overall exposure, on average, is from dust, but for others, 3-4 % is attributed to dust. We were able to identify important associations in PFAS exposure in the homes of pregnant people based on paired serum and dust samples. This built a clearer picture of which PFAS and at what quantities they exist in these homes, how they relate to each other, and how they are tied to sociodemographic and housing factors. Our results demonstrate that exposure to PFAS via house dust may contribute up to 25% of total exposure for adults, highlighting the importance of understanding what drives residential exposures.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是令人担忧的化学物质——它们无处不在、持久存在,对健康有着已知和疑似的影响。经过充分研究,PFAS的主要暴露源是饮用水和食物。普通人群人体组织中PFAS的存在表明还有其他重要的暴露源/途径。房屋灰尘测量表明住宅中PFAS广泛存在。有限的研究报告了室内介质中PFAS出现情况与血清中PFAS浓度的配对分析。虽然目前房屋灰尘和血清的配对样本很少见,但国家儿童研究(NCS)包含了参与该研究的孕妇的配对样本以及社会人口统计学信息。利用并分析了2009年至2014年期间收集的104名参与者的这些存档NCS数据和样本,检测了16种常见的PFAS。我们评估了家庭中的PFAS水平,以及灰尘和血清中PFAS之间的关系,以及社会人口统计学或住房变量。此外,使用了机械暴露模型,然后是具有简单参数的稳态血清水平模型来估计PFAS从灰尘到血清的贡献。血清中最常见的PFAS(表1中的全名)的几何平均值为:全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)4.1纳克/毫升,全氟辛酸(PFOA)1.1纳克/毫升,全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)0.87纳克/毫升,全氟癸酸(PFDA)0.16纳克/毫升。灰尘中PFAS的几何平均值为:PFOS 17微克/千克,PFOA 16微克/千克,全氟癸烷磺酸盐(PFDS)9.6微克/千克,全氟庚酸(PFHpA)4.5微克/千克,全氟萘酸(PFNA)4.4微克/千克,PFHxS 3.9微克/千克,PFDA 3.5微克/千克,全氟十二烷酸(PFDoA)2.3微克/千克,全氟十一烷酸(PFUdA)2.1微克/千克。血清和灰尘中的PFOA以及在超过50%的血清和灰尘中检测到的所有PFAS之和显著相关。血清中的PFAS与以下因素显著相关:较高收入、近期装修、在家居住年限和教育程度。灰尘中的PFAS与以下因素显著相关:参与者年龄较大、房屋类型、地毯数量、教育程度、较高收入、近期装修和军人身份。对于某些PFAS,平均而言,25%的总体暴露来自灰尘,但对于其他PFAS,3 - 4%归因于灰尘。基于配对的血清和灰尘样本,我们能够确定孕妇家庭中PFAS暴露的重要关联。这更清楚地描绘了这些家庭中存在哪些PFAS及其数量、它们之间的关系以及它们与社会人口统计学和住房因素的联系。我们的结果表明,通过房屋灰尘接触PFAS可能占成年人总暴露量的25%,凸显了了解导致住宅暴露的因素的重要性。