• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同缝合材料用于大鼠腹部筋膜伤口闭合对Ⅰ型/Ⅲ型胶原蛋白表达比例的影响。

The effect of different suturing materials for abdominal fascia wound closure on the collagen I/III expression ratio in rats.

作者信息

Sofii Imam, Dipoyono Wisnu, Prima Heryu, Sari Yessy Martha, Fauzi Aditya Rifqi

机构信息

Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.

Pediatric Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Oct 23;60:106-109. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.033. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.033
PMID:33145017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7593262/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal wall incision and has a high rate of recurrence. Most of the studies stated that non-absorbable sutures decreased incisional hernia incidences, but some stated otherwise. We aimed to compare the ratio between monofilament non-absorbable sutures and multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal fascia closure in Wistar albino rats.

METHODS

Forty rats were divided into four groups. Groups 1 and 3 were sutured with monofilament non-absorbable (). Groups 2 and 4 were sutured with multifilament absorbable (). Then, groups 1 and 2 were euthanized on day 4 (POD 4), while groups 3 and 4 were euthanized on day 7 (POD 7). Samples of fascia (1 × 0.5 cm) were taken for analysis. ratios were measured using immunohistochemistry staining methods.

RESULTS

While the expression of was not significantly different between monofilament non-absorbable and multifilament absorbable at POD 4 and 7 ( = 0.45 and 0.81, respectively), the expression of reached a significant level with -values of 0.0003 and 0.0004 for POD 4 and 7, respectively. Moreover, the ratio was also significantly different between the two groups either at POD 4 (0.88 ± 0.23 0.53 ± 0.08;  = 0.0003) and 7 (1.77 ± 0.65 1.03 ± 0.28;  = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Monofilament non-absorbable sutures show a significantly higher ratio than multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal fascia closure in rats. Our findings imply that the usage of monofilament non-absorbable sutures might have a beneficial effect on decreasing the incisional hernia occurrence.

摘要

背景

切口疝是腹壁切口常见的并发症,复发率高。大多数研究表明,不可吸收缝线可降低切口疝的发生率,但也有一些研究得出了相反的结论。我们旨在比较单丝不可吸收缝线和多丝可吸收缝线在Wistar白化大鼠腹壁筋膜闭合中的比例。

方法

将40只大鼠分为四组。第1组和第3组用单丝不可吸收缝线缝合。第2组和第4组用多丝可吸收缝线缝合。然后,第1组和第2组在术后第4天(POD 4)安乐死,而第3组和第4组在术后第7天(POD 7)安乐死。取筋膜样本(1×0.5 cm)进行分析。使用免疫组织化学染色方法测量比例。

结果

虽然在POD 4和7时,单丝不可吸收缝线和多丝可吸收缝线之间的表达无显著差异(分别为=0.45和0.81),但在POD 4和7时,的表达分别达到显著水平,P值分别为0.0003和0.0004。此外,两组在POD 4(0.88±0.23对0.53±0.08;=0.0003)和7(1.77±0.65对1.03±0.28;=0.004)时的比例也有显著差异。

结论

在大鼠腹壁筋膜闭合中,单丝不可吸收缝线的比例显著高于多丝可吸收缝线。我们的研究结果表明,使用单丝不可吸收缝线可能对降低切口疝的发生有有益作用。

需注意,原文中部分内容缺失具体名称,翻译时保留了原文格式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa4/7593262/4125306a1e58/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa4/7593262/4f4d2e47144f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa4/7593262/4125306a1e58/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa4/7593262/4f4d2e47144f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fa4/7593262/4125306a1e58/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of different suturing materials for abdominal fascia wound closure on the collagen I/III expression ratio in rats.不同缝合材料用于大鼠腹部筋膜伤口闭合对Ⅰ型/Ⅲ型胶原蛋白表达比例的影响。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Oct 23;60:106-109. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.033. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.用于腹部缝合的单丝与多丝可吸收缝线
Br J Surg. 1993 Mar;80(3):322-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800318.
3
The effect on incisional hernia of absorbable barbed suture for midline fascial closure in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal and gastric cancers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.可吸收带刺缝线用于结直肠和胃癌微创手术中正中筋膜闭合对切口疝的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 May 6;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07324-x.
4
Comparing the effect of tissue adhesive and suturing material on collagen I/III ratio in abdominal skin wounds: an experimental study.比较组织粘合剂和缝合材料对腹部皮肤伤口I/III型胶原蛋白比例的影响:一项实验研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 20;85(11):5450-5453. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001206. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania.择期正中剖腹术后腹部筋膜关闭:坦桑尼亚一家三级护理医院的手术经验
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jun 30;8:281. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1243-4.
6
Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.腹部缝合时使用慢吸收与快吸收、抗菌涂层缝线,哪种缝线导致切口疝的风险更低?
Surgery. 2012 Mar;151(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
7
The impact of different suturing techniques for abdominal fascia closure on the Interleukin-6 expressions in Rattus norvegicus.不同腹部筋膜缝合技术对大鼠白细胞介素-6表达的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Oct 30;13(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05349-y.
8
Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.剖腹术闭合技术:外科医生是否遵循最新指南?问卷调查结果。
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Apr-Jun;23(2):51-4.
10
Reduced rate of incisional hernia after standardized fascial closure in emergency laparotomy.急诊剖腹手术中标准化筋膜闭合术后切口疝发生率降低。
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):341-346. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01893-0. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Molecular Function and Recombinant Expression of Human Collagen.人类胶原蛋白的分子功能与重组表达研究进展
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;18(3):430. doi: 10.3390/ph18030430.
2
Occurrence and prevention of incisional hernia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术后切口疝的发生与预防
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):1973-1980. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.1973.
3
Comparing the effect of tissue adhesive and suturing material on collagen I/III ratio in abdominal skin wounds: an experimental study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for repair of achilles tendon rupture with a suture-guiding device.使用缝线引导装置评估可吸收和不可吸收缝线修复跟腱断裂的效果。
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jun;36(6):691-5. doi: 10.1177/1071100714568868. Epub 2015 May 4.
2
European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions.欧洲疝外科学会腹壁切口缝合指南
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
3
Wound healing in acutely injured fascia.急性损伤筋膜的伤口愈合
比较组织粘合剂和缝合材料对腹部皮肤伤口I/III型胶原蛋白比例的影响:一项实验研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 20;85(11):5450-5453. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001206. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
THE USE OF SURGICAL ADHESIVE AND SUTURE FIXING MESHES TO THE ABDOMINAL WALL: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN RATS.腹壁使用外科黏合剂和缝线固定网片:大鼠实验研究。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022 Jun 17;35:e1649. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1649. eCollection 2022.
Wound Repair Regen. 2014 May;22 Suppl 1:14-7. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12165.
4
Molecular factors of failure in incisional hernia surgery.
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013 Mar-Apr;108(2):193-8.
5
Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.改进生物科学研究报告:动物研究报告的ARRIVE指南
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 29;8(6):e1000412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412.
6
Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial.缝线长度对中线切口闭合后伤口并发症的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1056-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.189.
7
Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures in the management of traumatic lacerations and surgical wounds: a meta-analysis.可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线在创伤性撕裂伤和手术伤口处理中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 May;23(5):339-44. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000270167.70615.5a.
8
Creep behavior of commonly used suture materials in abdominal wall surgery.腹壁手术中常用缝合材料的蠕变行为。
J Surg Res. 2007 Mar;138(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
9
A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.一项随机对照试验,比较用可吸收的普通肠线与不可吸收的尼龙缝线修复小儿外伤性撕裂伤的长期美容效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jul;11(7):730-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.029.
10
Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线在面部皮肤伤口缝合中的比较。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;5(6):488-90. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.5.6.488.