Free International University of Moldova, Chisinau, Moldova.
Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 Nov 5;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00417-x.
The quality of healthcare in Israel is considered "high", and this achievement is due to the structure and organization of the healthcare system. The goal of the present review is to describe the major achievements and challenges of quality improvement in the Israeli healthcare system. BODY: In recent years, the Ministry of Health has made major strides in increasing the public's access to comparative data on quality, finances and patient satisfaction. Several mechanisms at multiple levels help promote quality improvement and patient safety. These include legislation, financial incentives, and national programs for quality indicators, patient experience, patient safety, prevention and control of infection and accreditation. Over the years, improvements in quality indicators, infection prevention and patient satisfaction can be demonstrated, but other fields show little change, if at all. Challenges and barriers include reluctance by unions, inconsistent and unreliable flow of information, the fear of overpressure by management and the loss of autonomy by physicians, and doubts regarding "gaming" of data. Accreditation has its own challenges, such as the need to adjust it to local characteristics of the healthcare system, its high cost, and the limited evidence of its impact on quality. Lack of interest by leaders, lack of resources, burnout and compassion fatigue, are listed as challenges for improving patient experience.
Substantial efforts are being made in Israel to improve quality of care, based on the use of good data to understand what is working and what needs particular attention. Government and health care providers have the tools to continue to improve. However, several mechanisms for improving the quality of care, such as minimizing healthcare disparities, training for quality, and widespread implementation of the "choosing wisely" initiative, should be implemented more intensively and effectively.
以色列的医疗保健质量被认为是“高”的,这一成就归因于医疗保健系统的结构和组织。本综述的目的是描述以色列医疗保健系统质量改进的主要成就和挑战。
近年来,卫生部在增加公众对质量、财务和患者满意度的比较数据的获取方面取得了重大进展。多个层面的多种机制有助于促进质量改进和患者安全。这些机制包括立法、财政激励以及质量指标、患者体验、患者安全、感染预防和控制以及认证的国家计划。多年来,可以证明质量指标、感染预防和患者满意度有所改善,但其他领域几乎没有变化。挑战和障碍包括工会的不情愿、信息不一致和不可靠、管理层过度施压的恐惧以及医生自主权的丧失,以及对数据“操纵”的怀疑。认证本身也存在挑战,例如需要根据医疗保健系统的当地特点进行调整、成本高以及对其对质量的影响的证据有限。缺乏领导层的兴趣、资源匮乏、倦怠和同情心疲劳,被列为改善患者体验的挑战。
以色列正在做出巨大努力来改善医疗保健质量,这是基于使用良好的数据来了解哪些方面有效,哪些方面需要特别关注。政府和医疗保健提供者拥有继续改进的工具。然而,应该更深入、更有效地实施一些改善医疗保健质量的机制,例如最大限度地减少医疗保健差距、质量培训以及广泛实施“明智选择”倡议。