Wills Thomas A, Soneji Samir S, Choi Kelvin, Jaspers Ilona, Tam Elizabeth K
Cancer Prevention Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Eur Respir J. 2021 Jan 21;57(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01815-2019. Print 2021 Jan.
Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is prevalent among adolescents and young adults, but there has been limited knowledge about health consequences in human populations. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of results on respiratory disorders from studies of general-population samples and consider the mapping of these results to findings about biological processes linked to e-cigarettes in controlled laboratory studies.
We conducted a literature search and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies on the association of e-cigarette use with asthma and with COPD. We discuss findings from laboratory studies about effects of e-cigarettes on four biological processes: cytotoxicity, oxidative stress/inflammation, susceptibility to infection and genetic expression.
Epidemiological studies, both cross-sectional and longitudinal, show a significant association of e-cigarette use with asthma and COPD, controlling for cigarette smoking and other covariates. For asthma (n=15 studies), the pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 1.39 (95% CI 1.28-1.51); for COPD (n=9 studies) the aOR was 1.49 (95% CI 1.36-1.65). Laboratory studies consistently show an effect of e-cigarettes on biological processes related to respiratory harm and susceptibility to illness, with e-cigarette conditions differing significantly from clean-air controls, although sometimes less than for cigarettes.
The evidence from epidemiological studies meets established criteria for consistency, strength of effect, temporality, and in some cases a dose-response gradient. Biological plausibility is indicated by evidence from multiple laboratory studies. We conclude that e-cigarette use has consequences for asthma and COPD, which is of concern for respirology and public health.
电子烟在青少年和年轻人中使用普遍,但对于其对人群健康影响的了解有限。我们对来自普通人群样本研究的呼吸系统疾病结果进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,并考虑将这些结果与对照实验室研究中与电子烟相关的生物学过程的研究结果进行对比。
我们对电子烟使用与哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)关联的流行病学研究进行了文献检索和荟萃分析。我们讨论了实验室研究中电子烟对四个生物学过程的影响结果:细胞毒性、氧化应激/炎症、感染易感性和基因表达。
横断面和纵向的流行病学研究均显示,在控制吸烟和其他协变量的情况下,电子烟使用与哮喘和COPD之间存在显著关联。对于哮喘(n = 15项研究),合并调整优势比(aOR)为1.39(95%CI 1.28 - 1.51);对于COPD(n = 9项研究),aOR为1.49(95%CI 1.36 - 1.65)。实验室研究一致表明电子烟对与呼吸损害和疾病易感性相关的生物学过程有影响,电子烟条件与清洁空气对照有显著差异,尽管有时差异小于香烟。
流行病学研究的证据符合关于一致性、效应强度、时间顺序的既定标准,在某些情况下还符合剂量反应梯度标准。多项实验室研究的证据表明了生物学合理性。我们得出结论,使用电子烟会对哮喘和COPD产生影响,这对呼吸病学和公共卫生而言值得关注。