Cerreta Adelle G B, Mruczek Ryan E B, Berryhill Marian E
Program in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Program in Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Department of Psychology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 14;11:570030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570030. eCollection 2020.
The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on working memory (WM) performance are promising but variable and contested. In particular, designs involving one session of tDCS are prone to variable outcomes with notable effects of individual differences. Some participants benefit, whereas others are impaired by the same tDCS protocol. In contrast, protocols including multiple sessions of tDCS more consistently report WM improvement across participants. The objective of the current project was to test whether differences in resting-state connectivity between stimulation site and two WM-relevant networks [default mode network (DMN) and central executive network (CEN)] could account for initial and longitudinal responses to tDCS. Healthy young adults completed 5 days of visual WM training during sham or anodal right frontal tDCS. The behavioral data showed that only the active tDCS group significantly improved over the visual WM training period. There were no significant correlations between initial response to tDCS and resting-state activity. DMN activity in the anterior cingulate cortex significantly correlated with WM training slope. These data underscore the importance of sampling in studies applying tDCS; homogeneity (e.g., of gender, special population, and WM capacity) may produce more consistent data in a single experiment with limited power, whereas heterogeneity is important in determining the mechanism(s) and potential for tDCS-linked protocols. This issue is a limitation in tDCS findings that continues to hamper its optimization and translational value.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对工作记忆(WM)表现的影响前景良好,但存在变数且颇具争议。特别是,涉及单次tDCS的设计容易出现结果差异,个体差异的影响显著。一些参与者受益,而另一些参与者在相同的tDCS方案下却受到损害。相比之下,包括多次tDCS的方案在参与者中更一致地报告了WM的改善。当前项目的目的是测试刺激部位与两个与WM相关的网络[默认模式网络(DMN)和中央执行网络(CEN)]之间静息态连接的差异是否可以解释对tDCS的初始和纵向反应。健康的年轻成年人在假刺激或阳极右侧额叶tDCS期间完成了5天的视觉WM训练。行为数据表明,只有活跃的tDCS组在视觉WM训练期间有显著改善。对tDCS的初始反应与静息态活动之间没有显著相关性。前扣带回皮质中的DMN活动与WM训练斜率显著相关。这些数据强调了在应用tDCS研究中进行抽样的重要性;同质性(如性别、特殊人群和WM能力)在功率有限的单一实验中可能会产生更一致的数据,而异质性在确定tDCS相关方案的机制和潜力方面很重要。这个问题是tDCS研究结果中的一个限制,继续阻碍其优化和转化价值。