• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量保障:关于政府议程与证据基础的评论

Quality Protects: A Commentary on the Government's Agenda and the Evidence Base.

作者信息

Rushton Alan, Dance Cherilyn

机构信息

Section of Social Work and Social Care, Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

出版信息

Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2002 May;7(2):60-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-3588.00012.

DOI:10.1111/1475-3588.00012
PMID:33158346
Abstract

Quality Protects was introduced in 1998 as the government's main initiative to improve children's social services. This review considers the aims, origins and intended effects of the policy. While applauding the attempt to improve services, attention is drawn to four areas on which progress will depend: better performance indicators; the extent and quality of research based evidence; the expansion of professional social work training and user feedback and involvement. The first of the Quality Protects objectives on promoting secure attachment is highlighted and the evidence for the current emphasis on adoption is considered. The article concludes that the extent of progress that is being made to help children and families in difficulty will need to be assessed by systematic research as well as by routine service performance indicators.

摘要

“优质保护”于1998年推出,是政府改善儿童社会服务的主要举措。本综述探讨了该政策的目标、起源和预期效果。在赞赏改善服务的努力的同时,本文指出了取得进展将取决于的四个方面:更好的绩效指标;基于研究的证据的范围和质量;专业社会工作培训的扩展以及用户反馈和参与。文中强调了“优质保护”促进安全依恋的首要目标,并考量了当前对收养重视的证据。文章得出结论,帮助困难儿童和家庭所取得的进展程度,需要通过系统研究以及常规服务绩效指标来评估。

相似文献

1
Quality Protects: A Commentary on the Government's Agenda and the Evidence Base.质量保障:关于政府议程与证据基础的评论
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2002 May;7(2):60-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-3588.00012.
2
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?政府应该在制定健康政策方面采取哪些措施来发展上海的社区卫生保健?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.
3
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
4
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
5
The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act quality measures initiatives: moving forward to improve measurement, care, and child and adolescent outcomes.《儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》质量措施倡议:为改善衡量标准、医疗服务以及儿童和青少年的健康结果而努力。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S1-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.02.009.
6
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
7
Prioritizing Possibilities for Child and Family Health: An Agenda to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Foster the Social and Emotional Roots of Well-being in Pediatrics.优先考虑儿童和家庭健康的可能性:解决不良儿童经历问题并促进儿科学中幸福感的社会和情感根源的议程。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S36-S50. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.06.002.
8
Mental health nursing students' experiences of stress during training: a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.精神科护理专业学生在培训期间的压力体验:质性访谈的主题分析
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Dec;22(10):773-83. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12273. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving the care system: education and resilience.在照料系统中生存:教育与适应力。
J Adolesc. 1998 Oct;21(5):569-83. doi: 10.1006/jado.1998.0178.
2
Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in young people in the care system.受照料系统中青少年精神疾病的患病率。
BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1529-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1529.