Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Integr Biol (Camb). 2020 Nov 18;12(11):275-289. doi: 10.1093/intbio/zyaa022.
Endothelial cells (ECs) are an active component of the immune system and interact directly with inflammatory cytokines. While ECs are known to be polarized cells, the potential role of apicobasal polarity in response to inflammatory mediators has been scarcely studied. Acute inflammation is vital in maintaining healthy tissue in response to infection; however, chronic inflammation can lead to the production of systemic inflammatory cytokines and deregulated leukocyte trafficking, even in the absence of a local infection. Elevated levels of cytokines in circulation underlie the pathogenesis of sepsis, the leading cause of intensive care death. Because ECs constitute a key barrier between circulation (luminal interface) and tissue (abluminal interface), we hypothesize that ECs respond differentially to inflammatory challenge originating in the tissue versus circulation as in local and systemic inflammation, respectively. To begin this investigation, we stimulated ECs abluminally and luminally with the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) to mimic a key feature of local and systemic inflammation, respectively, in a microvascular mimetic (μSiM-MVM). Polarized IL-8 secretion and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) transmigration were quantified to characterize the EC response to luminal versus abluminal TNF-α. We observed that ECs uniformly secrete IL-8 in response to abluminal TNF-α and is followed by PMN transmigration. The response to abluminal treatment was coupled with the formation of ICAM-1-rich membrane ruffles on the apical surface of ECs. In contrast, luminally stimulated ECs secreted five times more IL-8 into the luminal compartment than the abluminal compartment and sequestered PMNs on the apical EC surface. Our results identify clear differences in the response of ECs to TNF-α originating from the abluminal versus luminal side of a monolayer for the first time and may provide novel insight into future inflammatory disease intervention strategies.
内皮细胞(ECs)是免疫系统的一个活跃组成部分,与炎症细胞因子直接相互作用。虽然已知 ECs 是极化细胞,但炎症介质对顶端基底极性的潜在作用研究甚少。急性炎症对于响应感染维持健康组织至关重要;然而,慢性炎症会导致全身性炎症细胞因子的产生和白细胞迁移失调,即使在没有局部感染的情况下也是如此。循环中细胞因子水平升高是脓毒症发病机制的基础,脓毒症是重症监护死亡的主要原因。由于 ECs 构成了循环(腔界面)和组织(非腔界面)之间的关键屏障,我们假设 ECs 会对源自组织和循环的炎症挑战做出不同的反应,分别模拟局部和全身性炎症。为了开始这项研究,我们通过炎症细胞因子肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)对 ECs 的腔侧和非腔侧进行刺激,分别模拟局部和全身性炎症的一个关键特征,在微血管模拟物(μSiM-MVM)中进行。极化的白细胞介素-8(IL-8)分泌和多形核中性粒细胞(PMN)迁移被量化,以表征 EC 对腔侧和非腔侧 TNF-α的反应。我们观察到,ECs 均匀地对非腔侧 TNF-α分泌 IL-8,随后 PMN 迁移。非腔侧处理的反应与 EC 顶端表面上富含细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)的膜皱襞的形成相关。相比之下,腔侧刺激的 ECs 向腔侧隔室分泌的 IL-8 是腔侧隔室的五倍,并且将 PMN 隔离在 EC 顶端表面上。我们的研究结果首次确定了 EC 对来自单层非腔侧和腔侧的 TNF-α的反应存在明显差异,这可能为未来的炎症性疾病干预策略提供新的见解。