Suppr超能文献

背景下的研究伦理:了解生活在泰缅边境的研究参与者的脆弱性、能动性和足智多谋。

Research ethics in context: understanding the vulnerabilities, agency and resourcefulness of research participants living along the Thai-Myanmar border.

机构信息

Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.

Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):551-559. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa052.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research ethics guidelines set a high bar for conducting research with vulnerable populations, often resulting in their exclusion from beneficial research. Our study aims to better characterise participants' vulnerabilities, agency, resourcefulness and sources of support.

METHODS

We undertook qualitative research around two clinical studies involving migrant women living along the Thai-Myanmar border. We conducted 32 in-depth interviews and 10 focus group discussions with research participants, families, researchers and key informants.

RESULTS

We found that being 'undocumented' is at the core of many structural vulnerabilities, reflecting political, economic, social and health needs. Although migrant women lead challenging lives, they have a support network that includes family, employers, community leaders, non-governmental organisations and research networks. Migrant women choose to participate in research to access quality healthcare, gain knowledge and obtain extra money. However, research has the potential to exacerbate existing vulnerabilities, such as the burdens of cross-border travel, foregoing work and being more visible as migrants.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that research is important to provide evidence-based care and was viewed by participants as offering many benefits, but it also has hidden burdens. Migrant women exercised agency and resourcefulness when navigating challenges in their lives and research participation.

摘要

背景

研究伦理准则为弱势群体的研究设定了高标准,这往往导致他们被排除在有益的研究之外。我们的研究旨在更好地描述参与者的脆弱性、能动性、足智多谋和支持来源。

方法

我们围绕涉及居住在泰国-缅甸边境的移民妇女的两项临床研究进行了定性研究。我们对研究参与者、家属、研究人员和主要知情人进行了 32 次深入访谈和 10 次焦点小组讨论。

结果

我们发现,“无证”是许多结构性脆弱性的核心,反映了政治、经济、社会和健康需求。尽管移民妇女过着艰难的生活,但她们有一个支持网络,包括家庭、雇主、社区领袖、非政府组织和研究网络。移民妇女选择参与研究是为了获得高质量的医疗保健、获取知识和额外的收入。然而,研究有可能加剧现有的脆弱性,例如跨境旅行的负担、放弃工作和作为移民更加显眼。

结论

我们的研究证实,研究对于提供基于证据的护理很重要,参与者认为研究有很多好处,但也有隐藏的负担。移民妇女在应对生活和研究参与中的挑战时表现出能动性和足智多谋。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/818e/7651704/89d315b7b6fc/ihaa052fig1.jpg

相似文献

3
Migrant and Refugee Patient Perspectives on Travel and Tuberculosis along the Thailand-Myanmar Border: A Qualitative Study.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 10;11(8):e0160222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160222. eCollection 2016.
4
8
Malaria control among Myanmar migrants in Thailand: a qualitative study of healthcare providers.
Malar J. 2025 May 22;24(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05397-4.

引用本文的文献

2
Migration health ethics in Southeast Asia: a scoping review.
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Jun 4;8:391. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19572.2. eCollection 2023.
5
Culturally responsive research ethics: How the socio-ethical norms of Arr-nar/Kreng-jai inform research participation at the Thai-Myanmar border.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 4;3(5):e0001875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001875. eCollection 2023.
8
'Labouring' on the frontlines of global health research: mapping challenges experienced by frontline workers in Africa and Asia.
Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec;17(12):4195-4205. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2124300. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
9
Under the Mask: A Film on Tuberculosis at the Thai-Myanmar Border.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 21;10:795503. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.795503. eCollection 2022.
10
Spotlight on global health research.
Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):507-508. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa082.

本文引用的文献

2
Reflections on the ethics of participatory visual methods to engage communities in global health research.
Glob Bioeth. 2017 Dec 20;29(1):22-38. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2017.1415722. eCollection 2018.
3
Ethics, regulation, and beyond: the landscape of research with pregnant women.
Reprod Health. 2017 Dec 14;14(Suppl 3):173. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0421-3.
4
Development of drugs for severe malaria in children.
Int Health. 2016 Sep;8(5):313-6. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw038. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
5
Conceptualising the agency of highly marginalised women: Intimate partner violence in extreme settings.
Glob Public Health. 2016;11(1-2):1-16. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1109694.
7
Research consent from young people in resource-poor settings.
Arch Dis Child. 2015 May;100(5):438-40. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307121. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
Ancillary Care: From Theory to Practice in International Clinical Research.
Public Health Ethics. 2013 Jul;6(2):154-169. doi: 10.1093/phe/pht015. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验