Departament of Economics, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur (IIESS), Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):2252-2261. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26659. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
There is a debate in Argentina about the effectiveness of mandatory lockdown policies containing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 disease. This policy has already 6 months long making it one of the longest in the world. The population effort to comply with the lockdown has been decreasing over time given the economic and social costs that it entails. This contribution analyzes the relationship between mobility and contagion in Argentina at a provincial level. It also models issues of internal political discussion on regional contagion and the effect of protests and unexpected crowd events. I use pool, fixed, and random effects panel data modeling and results show that lockdown in Argentina has been effective in reducing mobility but not in a way that reduces the rate of contagion. Strict lockdown seems to be effective in short periods of time and but extend it without complementary mitigation measures it losses effectiveness. The contagion rate seems to be discretely displaced in time and resurges amidst slowly increasing in mobility.
阿根廷存在关于实施强制性封锁政策以控制 2 型严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒有效性的争论。该政策已经持续了 6 个月,是世界上持续时间最长的政策之一。随着经济和社会成本的增加,民众遵守封锁的意愿逐渐降低。本研究分析了在省级层面上阿根廷移动性与传染之间的关系。它还对区域传染的内部政治讨论问题以及抗议和意外人群事件的影响进行了建模。我使用了面板数据的 pooled、fixed 和 random effects 模型,结果表明,阿根廷的封锁政策在降低移动性方面是有效的,但并没有降低传染率。严格的封锁在短时间内似乎是有效的,但如果不采取补充缓解措施来延长封锁,它的效果就会减弱。传染率似乎在时间上离散地转移,而在移动性缓慢增加的情况下又重新出现。