Suppr超能文献

减少医学研究中的偏倚和提高透明度:问题、进展和建议下一步的批判性综述。

Reducing bias and improving transparency in medical research: a critical overview of the problems, progress and suggested next steps.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2020 Nov;113(11):433-443. doi: 10.1177/0141076820956799.

Abstract

In recent years there has been increasing awareness of problems that have undermined trust in medical research. This review outlines some of the most important issues including research culture, reporting biases, and statistical and methodological issues. It examines measures that have been instituted to address these problems and explores the success and limitations of these measures. The paper concludes by proposing three achievable actions which could be implemented to deliver significantly improved transparency and mitigation of bias. These measures are as follows: (1) mandatory registration of interests by those involved in research; (2) that journals support the 'registered reports' publication format; and (3) that comprehensive study documentation for all publicly funded research be made available on a World Health Organization research repository. We suggest that achieving such measures requires a broad-based campaign which mobilises public opinion. We invite readers to feedback on the proposed actions and to join us in calling for their implementation.

摘要

近年来,人们越来越意识到一些问题,这些问题破坏了对医学研究的信任。本综述概述了一些最重要的问题,包括研究文化、报告偏倚以及统计和方法学问题。它审查了为解决这些问题而采取的措施,并探讨了这些措施的成功和局限性。本文最后提出了三项可实现的行动,以实现显著提高透明度和减轻偏见的目标。这些措施如下:(1)要求参与研究的人员强制性地注册利益关系;(2)期刊支持“注册报告”的出版格式;(3)所有公共资助研究的全面研究文件都应在世界卫生组织的研究存储库中提供。我们认为,实现这些措施需要一场广泛的运动,以动员公众舆论。我们邀请读者对拟议的行动提出反馈意见,并与我们一起呼吁实施这些行动。

相似文献

3
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
10
Improving medical research in the United Kingdom.提高英国的医学研究水平。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 13;15(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06050-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Design aspects for prognostic factor studies.预后因素研究的设计方面。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 31;15(8):e095065. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095065.
3
Navigating Authorship Ethics in Research: Challenges and Responsibilities.研究中的作者身份伦理:挑战与责任
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2024 Nov;62(279):712-713. doi: 10.31729/jnma.8816. Epub 2024 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.《评估研究人员的香港原则:促进研究诚信》
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
N-Best Evaluation for Academic Hiring and Promotion.学术招聘和晋升的 N 最佳评估。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Dec;23(12):983-985. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
9
Mapping the universe of registered reports.绘制注册报告的全貌。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Nov;2(11):793-796. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0444-y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验