• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
GP involvement after a cancer diagnosis; patients' call to improve decision support.癌症确诊后全科医生的参与;患者呼吁改善决策支持。
BJGP Open. 2021 Feb 23;5(1). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101124. Print 2021 Jan.
2
Shared decision making in cancer treatment: A Dutch national survey on patients' preferences and perceptions.癌症治疗中的共同决策:荷兰全国范围内关于患者偏好和认知的调查。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13534. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13534. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Treatment decision-making and the added value of the general practitioner: A qualitative exploration of cancer patients' perspectives.治疗决策和全科医生的附加值:癌症患者观点的定性探讨。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 May;30(3):e13410. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13410. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study.全科医生在癌症患者共同决策中的作用:一项定性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jul;31(4):e13594. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13594. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
5
Shared decision-making in general practice: an observational study comparing 2007 with 2015.全科医学中的共同决策:一项比较 2007 年和 2015 年的观察性研究。
Fam Pract. 2019 May 23;36(3):357-364. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy070.
6
Shared decision making between patient and GP about referrals from primary care: Does gatekeeping make a difference?医患共同决策在初级保健转诊中的应用:守门人制度有影响吗?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0198729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198729. eCollection 2018.
7
The Patient's Perspective on Shared Decision-Making in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.帕金森病晚期患者对共同决策的看法:一项横断面调查研究
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 16;10:896. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00896. eCollection 2019.
8
Shared decision making and antibiotic benefit-harm conversations: an observational study of consultations between general practitioners and patients with acute respiratory infections.共同决策与抗生素利弊讨论:一项关于全科医生与急性呼吸道感染患者会诊的观察性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Oct 6;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0854-y.
9
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Through the Eyes of Patients: The Effect of Training General Practitioners and Nurses on Perceived Shared Decision-Making Support.从患者的角度看:培训全科医生和护士对感知到的共同决策支持的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231203693. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Trusting relationships between patients with non-curative cancer and healthcare professionals create ethical obstacles for informed consent in clinical trials: a grounded theory study.非治愈性癌症患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的信任关系为临床试验中的知情同意带来了伦理障碍:扎根理论研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 1;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01204-6.
3
Cost-effectiveness of general practitioner- versus surgeon-led colon cancer survivorship care: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.初级保健医生与外科医生主导的结肠癌生存者护理的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的经济评估。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Aug;18(4):1393-1402. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01383-4. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Detection of colon cancer recurrences during follow-up care by general practitioners vs surgeons.在随访中由全科医生和外科医生检测结肠癌复发。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 May 8;115(5):523-529. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad019.
5
Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study.全科医生在癌症患者共同决策中的作用:一项定性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jul;31(4):e13594. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13594. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
6
'You know where we are if you need us.' The role of primary care in supporting patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: a qualitative study.“若您需要我们,您知道我们在哪里。” 基层医疗在支持胰腺癌患者胰十二指肠切除术后康复中的作用:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2022 Aug 30;6(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0154. Print 2022 Jun.
7
Quality of hospital discharge letters for patients at the end of life: A retrospective medical record review.终末期患者出院小结质量:回顾性病历审查。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13524. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13524. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences and needs of patients with incurable cancer regarding advance care planning: results from a national cross-sectional survey.无法治愈的癌症患者对预先医疗照护计划的体验和需求:一项全国性横断面调查的结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4211-4217. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05285-z. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
2
Off to a good start after a cancer diagnosis: implementation of a time out consultation in primary care before cancer treatment decision.癌症诊断后的良好开端:在癌症治疗决策前,在初级保健中实施暂停咨询。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Feb;14(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00814-5. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
3
Using the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) to assess the preferences of older patients in clinical decision-making: A review.使用结局优先化工具(OPT)评估老年患者在临床决策中的偏好:综述。
Maturitas. 2019 Oct;128:49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.07.022. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
4
Introducing a time out consultation with the general practitioner between diagnosis and start of colorectal cancer treatment: Patient-reported outcomes.引入在结直肠癌诊断和治疗开始之间与全科医生进行的暂停咨询:患者报告的结果。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Nov;28(6):e13141. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13141. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization.随机对照试验方案(GRIP 研究):研究在癌症诊断后,普通医生和家庭癌症护理护士的参与对患者报告的结局和医疗保健利用的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4005-6.
6
A "time out consultation" in primary care for elderly patients with cancer: Better treatment decisions by structural involvement of the general practitioner.针对老年癌症患者的基层医疗“暂停咨询”:通过全科医生的结构性参与做出更好的治疗决策。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12711. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Involvement of Primary Care Physicians in the Decision Making and Care of Patients With Breast Cancer.初级保健医生参与乳腺癌患者的决策制定与护理
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):3969-3975. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.8896. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
The role of the general practitioner in cancer care: a survey of the patients' perspective.全科医生在癌症护理中的作用:患者视角的调查
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 May;143(5):895-904. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2343-4. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
Patients' views on general practitioners' role during treatment and follow-up of colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.患者对全科医生在结直肠癌治疗及随访过程中作用的看法:一项定性研究
Fam Pract. 2017 Apr 1;34(2):234-238. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw124.
10
Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care: a qualitative longitudinal observational and interview study.晚期癌症护理中共同决策面临的挑战:一项定性纵向观察与访谈研究
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):69-84. doi: 10.1111/hex.12434. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

癌症确诊后全科医生的参与;患者呼吁改善决策支持。

GP involvement after a cancer diagnosis; patients' call to improve decision support.

作者信息

Noteboom Eveline A, Perfors Ietje Aa, May Anne M, Stegmann Mariken E, Duijts Saskia Fa, Visserman Ella A, Engelen Vivian, Richel Carol, van der Wall Elsken, de Wit Niek, Helsper Charles W

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2021 Feb 23;5(1). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101124. Print 2021 Jan.

DOI:10.3399/bjgpopen20X101124
PMID:33172850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7960515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making (SDM) is considered important to realise personalised cancer care. Increased GP involvement after a diagnosis is advocated to improve SDM.

AIM

To explore whether patients with cancer are in need of GP involvement in cancer care in general and in SDM, and whether GP involvement occurs.

DESIGN & SETTING: An online national survey was distributed by the Dutch Federation of Cancer Patient Organisations (NFK) in May 2019.

METHOD

The survey was sent to (former) patients with cancer. Topics included GP involvement in cancer care in general and in SDM. Descriptive statistics and quotes were used.

RESULTS

Among 4763 (former) patients with cancer, 59% ( = 2804) expressed a need for GP involvement in cancer care. Of these patients, 79% ( = 2193) experienced GP involvement. Regarding GP involvement in SDM, 82% of patients ( = 3724) expressed that the GP should 'listen to patients' worries and considerations', 69% ( = 3130) to 'check patients' understanding of information', 66% ( = 3006) to 'discuss patients' priorities in life and the consequences of treatment options for these priorities', and 67% ( = 3045) to 'create awareness of the patient's role in the decision making'. This happened in 47%, 17%, 15% and 10% of these patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The majority of (former) patients with cancer expressed a need for active GP involvement in cancer care. GP support in the fundamental SDM steps is presently insufficient. Therefore, GPs should be made aware of these needs and enabled to support their patients with cancer in SDM.

摘要

背景

共同决策(SDM)被认为对实现个性化癌症护理很重要。提倡在诊断后增加全科医生的参与以改善共同决策。

目的

探讨癌症患者总体上是否需要全科医生参与癌症护理及共同决策,以及全科医生是否参与其中。

设计与设置

2019年5月,荷兰癌症患者组织联合会(NFK)开展了一项全国性在线调查。

方法

该调查发送给了癌症( former)患者。主题包括全科医生总体上及在共同决策中对癌症护理的参与情况。使用了描述性统计和引述。

结果

在4763名癌症(former)患者中,59%(=2804)表示需要全科医生参与癌症护理。在这些患者中,79%(=2193)经历过全科医生的参与。关于全科医生在共同决策中的参与,82%的患者(=3724)表示全科医生应“倾听患者的担忧和考虑”,69%(=3130)应“检查患者对信息的理解”,66%(=3006)应“讨论患者生活中的优先事项以及这些优先事项的治疗选择后果”,67%(=3045)应“提高患者对其在决策中作用的认识”。而这些情况分别在47%、17%、15%和10%的患者中发生。

结论

大多数癌症(former)患者表示需要全科医生积极参与癌症护理。目前全科医生在共同决策基本步骤中的支持不足。因此,应让全科医生意识到这些需求,并使其能够在共同决策中为癌症患者提供支持。