文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

斯堪的纳维亚人群中女性乳房美学因素优先级列表。

An Aesthetic Factor Priority List of the Female Breast in Scandinavian Subjects.

作者信息

Sandberg Lars Johan, Tønseth Kim A, Kloster-Jensen Kristine, Liu Jun, Robe Charee, Reece Gregory, Hansen Elisabeth H, Berntsen Karin, Halle Martin, Edsander-Nord Åsa, Höckerstedt Anna, Kauhanen Susanna, Sneistrup Christian, Tindholdt Tyge, Petter Gullestad Hans, Gunnarsson Gudjon Leifur, Berg Erik, Selber Jesse Creed

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Norway; Telmark Healthcare Trust, Skien, Norway.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 11;8(10):e3173. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003173. eCollection 2020 Oct.


DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003173
PMID:33173686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little consensus about the relative determinative value of each individual factor in female breast aesthetics. When performing breast surgery with an aesthetic goal, certain factors will be more important than others. The purpose of this study was to make an aesthetic factor rank list to determine the relative contributions to overall breast aesthetics. METHOD: Volunteers were scanned using the 3-dimensional Vectra system. Ten Scandinavian plastic surgeons rated 37 subjects, using a validated scoring system with 49 scoring items. The correlation between specific aesthetic factors and overall breast aesthetic scores of the subjects were calculated using Pearson's r, Spearman's ρ, and Kendall's τ. RESULTS: A very strong correlation was found between overall breast aesthetic score and lower pole shape (0.876, < 0.0001). This was also true for upper pole shape (0.826, < 0.0001) and breast height (0.821, < 0.0001). A strong correlation was found between overall breast aesthetic score and nipple position (0.733, < 0.0001), breast size (0.644, < 0.0001), and breast width (0.632, < 0.0001). Factors that were only moderately correlated with aesthetic score were intermammary distance (0.496, = 0.002), nipple size and projection (0.588, < 0.0001), areolar diameter (0.484, < 0.0001), and areolar shape (0.403, < 0.0001). Perceived symmetry was a weak factor (0.363, = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Aesthetic factors of the female breast can be ranked in a priority list. Shape of the lower pole and upper pole and breast height are primary factors of female breast aesthetics. These should be prioritized in any aesthetic breast surgery. Vertical dimensional factors seem to be more determinative than horizontal factors.

摘要

背景:对于女性乳房美学中各个因素的相对决定价值,人们几乎没有达成共识。在进行以美学为目标的乳房手术时,某些因素会比其他因素更为重要。本研究的目的是制作一份美学因素排名清单,以确定各因素对整体乳房美学的相对贡献。 方法:使用三维Vectra系统对志愿者进行扫描。十位斯堪的纳维亚整形医生采用具有49个评分项目的经过验证的评分系统,对37名受试者进行评分。使用Pearson相关系数r、Spearman等级相关系数ρ和Kendall秩相关系数τ计算特定美学因素与受试者整体乳房美学评分之间的相关性。 结果:发现整体乳房美学评分与下极形状之间存在非常强的相关性(0.876,P<0.0001)。上极形状(0.826,P<0.0001)和乳房高度(0.821,P<0.0001)也是如此。整体乳房美学评分与乳头位置(0.733,P<0.0001)、乳房大小(0.644,P<0.0001)和乳房宽度(0.632,P<0.0001)之间存在强相关性。与美学评分仅呈中度相关的因素有胸骨间距离(0.496,P = 0.002)、乳头大小和突出度(0.588,P<0.0001)、乳晕直径(0.484,P<0.0001)和乳晕形状(0.403,P<0.0001)。感知对称性是一个较弱的因素(0.363,P = 0.027)。 结论:女性乳房的美学因素可以按优先顺序排列。下极和上极的形状以及乳房高度是女性乳房美学的主要因素。在任何美学乳房手术中都应优先考虑这些因素。垂直维度因素似乎比水平因素更具决定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/be1ab6822e29/gox-8-e3173-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/3950a3aec793/gox-8-e3173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/208faa457f5c/gox-8-e3173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/879c3ab6ddaa/gox-8-e3173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/147d37ccd7ee/gox-8-e3173-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/8853cc995e0d/gox-8-e3173-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/be1ab6822e29/gox-8-e3173-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/3950a3aec793/gox-8-e3173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/208faa457f5c/gox-8-e3173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/879c3ab6ddaa/gox-8-e3173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/147d37ccd7ee/gox-8-e3173-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/8853cc995e0d/gox-8-e3173-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/be1ab6822e29/gox-8-e3173-g006.jpg

相似文献

[1]
An Aesthetic Factor Priority List of the Female Breast in Scandinavian Subjects.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020-4-11

[2]
Beyond the 21-cm Notch-to-nipple Myth: Golden Proportions in Breast Aesthetics.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021-10-25

[3]
A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013-7

[4]
The Aesthetic Items Scale: A Tool for the Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcome after Breast Reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017-3-1

[5]
Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons.

Ann Plast Surg. 2015-6

[6]
Results of mammary glands topometry among yakut women with focus on age and importance of age in augmentation mammoplasty.

Wiad Lek. 2017

[7]
Analysis of Lower Breast Pole Length and Nipple-Areola Complex Position Following Superior Pedicle, Short Horizontal Scar Breast Reduction.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016-10

[8]
Prioritizing Native Breast Skin Preservation or Scar Symmetry in Autologous Breast Reconstruction? Using Crowdsourcing to Assess Preference.

Eplasty. 2023-12-6

[9]
Breast Augmentation and Breast Reconstruction Demonstrate Equivalent Aesthetic Outcomes.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016-7-20

[10]
A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
How Reliable Is Breast Volume Assessment When the Patient Is Lying Flat?-Volumetric Assessment of Breast Volume Using a Vectra H2 Handheld Device in Different Positions.

J Clin Med. 2024-1-25

[2]
Cosmetic Surgery and the Diversity of Cultural and Ethnic Perceptions of Facial, Breast, and Gluteal Aesthetics in Women: A Comprehensive Review.

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023-6-7

[3]
Brassiere Cup Size Agreement between Patients and Plastic Surgeons: Do Surgeons and Patients Speak the Same Size Language?

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023-6-9

[4]
Definitions of Abnormal Breast Size and Asymmetry: A Cohort Study of 400 Women.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023-12

[5]
Surgery of congenital breast asymmetry-which objective parameter influences the subjective satisfaction with long-term results.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022-10

[6]
Beyond the 21-cm Notch-to-nipple Myth: Golden Proportions in Breast Aesthetics.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021-10-25

本文引用的文献

[1]
What Makes a Difference? Three-Dimensional Morphological Study of Parameters that Determine Breast Aesthetics.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020-4

[2]
The notion of the ideal breast and its variability: Reviewing the difficulty of perceiving beauty through defined margins.

Breast J. 2019-6-6

[3]
The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial.

Breast. 2018-6-18

[4]
Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.

Eur J Plast Surg. 2017

[5]
The Plastic Surgery Compass: Navigating the Reconstructive Ladder in the Personalized Health Care Era.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016-9-21

[6]
Computation of breast ptosis from 3D surface scans of the female torso.

Comput Biol Med. 2016-11-1

[7]
The Aesthetically Ideal Position of the Nipple-Areola Complex on the Breast.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016-10

[8]
Nipple-areola complex reconstruction techniques: A literature review.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016-4

[9]
Shapes, Proportions, and Variations in Breast Aesthetic Ideals: The Definition of Breast Beauty, Analysis, and Surgical Practice.

Clin Plast Surg. 2015-10

[10]
Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.

Breast. 2015-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索