• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯堪的纳维亚人群中女性乳房美学因素优先级列表。

An Aesthetic Factor Priority List of the Female Breast in Scandinavian Subjects.

作者信息

Sandberg Lars Johan, Tønseth Kim A, Kloster-Jensen Kristine, Liu Jun, Robe Charee, Reece Gregory, Hansen Elisabeth H, Berntsen Karin, Halle Martin, Edsander-Nord Åsa, Höckerstedt Anna, Kauhanen Susanna, Sneistrup Christian, Tindholdt Tyge, Petter Gullestad Hans, Gunnarsson Gudjon Leifur, Berg Erik, Selber Jesse Creed

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Norway; Telmark Healthcare Trust, Skien, Norway.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 11;8(10):e3173. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003173. eCollection 2020 Oct.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003173
PMID:33173686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little consensus about the relative determinative value of each individual factor in female breast aesthetics. When performing breast surgery with an aesthetic goal, certain factors will be more important than others. The purpose of this study was to make an aesthetic factor rank list to determine the relative contributions to overall breast aesthetics.

METHOD

Volunteers were scanned using the 3-dimensional Vectra system. Ten Scandinavian plastic surgeons rated 37 subjects, using a validated scoring system with 49 scoring items. The correlation between specific aesthetic factors and overall breast aesthetic scores of the subjects were calculated using Pearson's r, Spearman's ρ, and Kendall's τ.

RESULTS

A very strong correlation was found between overall breast aesthetic score and lower pole shape (0.876, < 0.0001). This was also true for upper pole shape (0.826, < 0.0001) and breast height (0.821, < 0.0001). A strong correlation was found between overall breast aesthetic score and nipple position (0.733, < 0.0001), breast size (0.644, < 0.0001), and breast width (0.632, < 0.0001). Factors that were only moderately correlated with aesthetic score were intermammary distance (0.496, = 0.002), nipple size and projection (0.588, < 0.0001), areolar diameter (0.484, < 0.0001), and areolar shape (0.403, < 0.0001). Perceived symmetry was a weak factor (0.363, = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Aesthetic factors of the female breast can be ranked in a priority list. Shape of the lower pole and upper pole and breast height are primary factors of female breast aesthetics. These should be prioritized in any aesthetic breast surgery. Vertical dimensional factors seem to be more determinative than horizontal factors.

摘要

背景

对于女性乳房美学中各个因素的相对决定价值,人们几乎没有达成共识。在进行以美学为目标的乳房手术时,某些因素会比其他因素更为重要。本研究的目的是制作一份美学因素排名清单,以确定各因素对整体乳房美学的相对贡献。

方法

使用三维Vectra系统对志愿者进行扫描。十位斯堪的纳维亚整形医生采用具有49个评分项目的经过验证的评分系统,对37名受试者进行评分。使用Pearson相关系数r、Spearman等级相关系数ρ和Kendall秩相关系数τ计算特定美学因素与受试者整体乳房美学评分之间的相关性。

结果

发现整体乳房美学评分与下极形状之间存在非常强的相关性(0.876,P<0.0001)。上极形状(0.826,P<0.0001)和乳房高度(0.821,P<0.0001)也是如此。整体乳房美学评分与乳头位置(0.733,P<0.0001)、乳房大小(0.644,P<0.0001)和乳房宽度(0.632,P<0.0001)之间存在强相关性。与美学评分仅呈中度相关的因素有胸骨间距离(0.496,P = 0.002)、乳头大小和突出度(0.588,P<0.0001)、乳晕直径(0.484,P<0.0001)和乳晕形状(0.403,P<0.0001)。感知对称性是一个较弱的因素(0.363,P = 0.027)。

结论

女性乳房的美学因素可以按优先顺序排列。下极和上极的形状以及乳房高度是女性乳房美学的主要因素。在任何美学乳房手术中都应优先考虑这些因素。垂直维度因素似乎比水平因素更具决定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/be1ab6822e29/gox-8-e3173-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/3950a3aec793/gox-8-e3173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/208faa457f5c/gox-8-e3173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/879c3ab6ddaa/gox-8-e3173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/147d37ccd7ee/gox-8-e3173-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/8853cc995e0d/gox-8-e3173-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/be1ab6822e29/gox-8-e3173-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/3950a3aec793/gox-8-e3173-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/208faa457f5c/gox-8-e3173-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/879c3ab6ddaa/gox-8-e3173-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/147d37ccd7ee/gox-8-e3173-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/8853cc995e0d/gox-8-e3173-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56a/7647653/be1ab6822e29/gox-8-e3173-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
An Aesthetic Factor Priority List of the Female Breast in Scandinavian Subjects.斯堪的纳维亚人群中女性乳房美学因素优先级列表。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 11;8(10):e3173. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003173. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Beyond the 21-cm Notch-to-nipple Myth: Golden Proportions in Breast Aesthetics.超越21厘米“乳沟至乳头”神话:乳房美学中的黄金比例
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Oct 25;9(10):e3826. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003826. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction.一种量化美学和功能性乳房手术的方法:I. 量化乳房上提术和乳房缩小术的最佳乳头位置以及垂直和水平皮肤多余量。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):65-73. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910b0a.
4
The Aesthetic Items Scale: A Tool for the Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcome after Breast Reconstruction.美学项目量表:一种评估乳房重建术后美学效果的工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Mar 1;5(3):e1254. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001254. eCollection 2017 Mar.
5
Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons.整形外科医生对美观乳房形状的偏好。
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;74(6):639-44. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000001.
6
Results of mammary glands topometry among yakut women with focus on age and importance of age in augmentation mammoplasty.雅库特女性乳腺测量结果,重点关注年龄以及年龄在隆乳术中的重要性。
Wiad Lek. 2017;70(6 pt 1):1042-1046.
7
Analysis of Lower Breast Pole Length and Nipple-Areola Complex Position Following Superior Pedicle, Short Horizontal Scar Breast Reduction.上蒂短水平瘢痕乳房缩小术后乳房下极长度及乳头乳晕复合体位置分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):690-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0663-4. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
8
Prioritizing Native Breast Skin Preservation or Scar Symmetry in Autologous Breast Reconstruction? Using Crowdsourcing to Assess Preference.自体乳房重建中优先保留乳房原生皮肤还是追求瘢痕对称?利用众包评估偏好。
Eplasty. 2023 Dec 6;23:e75. eCollection 2023.
9
Breast Augmentation and Breast Reconstruction Demonstrate Equivalent Aesthetic Outcomes.隆胸与乳房重建显示出同等的美学效果。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 20;4(7):e811. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000824. eCollection 2016 Jul.
10
A measurement system for evaluation of shape changes and proportions after cosmetic breast surgery.用于评估美容乳房手术后形状变化和比例的测量系统。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Apr;129(4):982-992. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182442290.

引用本文的文献

1
How Reliable Is Breast Volume Assessment When the Patient Is Lying Flat?-Volumetric Assessment of Breast Volume Using a Vectra H2 Handheld Device in Different Positions.患者平躺时乳房体积评估的可靠性如何?——使用Vectra H2手持设备在不同体位下对乳房体积进行容积评估
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 25;13(3):709. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030709.
2
Cosmetic Surgery and the Diversity of Cultural and Ethnic Perceptions of Facial, Breast, and Gluteal Aesthetics in Women: A Comprehensive Review.美容手术与女性对面部、乳房和臀部美学的文化及种族认知多样性:一项综述
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Jun 7;16:1443-1456. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S410621. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What Makes a Difference? Three-Dimensional Morphological Study of Parameters that Determine Breast Aesthetics.是什么造就了不同?决定乳房美学的参数的三维形态学研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;44(2):315-322. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01426-1. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
2
The notion of the ideal breast and its variability: Reviewing the difficulty of perceiving beauty through defined margins.理想乳房的概念及其可变性:探讨通过明确的界限来感知美的困难。
Breast J. 2019 Sep;25(5):938-941. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13374. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial.
Brassiere Cup Size Agreement between Patients and Plastic Surgeons: Do Surgeons and Patients Speak the Same Size Language?
患者与整形外科医生之间的胸罩罩杯尺寸共识:医生和患者说的是同一种尺寸语言吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):e5046. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005046. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Definitions of Abnormal Breast Size and Asymmetry: A Cohort Study of 400 Women.乳房大小和不对称的定义:一项 400 名女性的队列研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2242-2252. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03400-4. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
Surgery of congenital breast asymmetry-which objective parameter influences the subjective satisfaction with long-term results.先天性乳房不对称手术——哪些客观参数会影响对长期效果的主观满意度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;306(4):1395-1397. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06392-1.
6
Beyond the 21-cm Notch-to-nipple Myth: Golden Proportions in Breast Aesthetics.超越21厘米“乳沟至乳头”神话:乳房美学中的黄金比例
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Oct 25;9(10):e3826. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003826. eCollection 2021 Oct.
三维图像在乳腺癌保乳治疗美容效果评价中的价值。一项前瞻性多中心临床试验结果。
Breast. 2018 Oct;41:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4
Predictability of anthropomorphic measurements in implant selection for breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.乳房重建植入物选择中人体测量的可预测性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Plast Surg. 2017;40(3):203-212. doi: 10.1007/s00238-016-1261-z. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
The Plastic Surgery Compass: Navigating the Reconstructive Ladder in the Personalized Health Care Era.《整形外科学指南:在个性化医疗时代攀登重建阶梯》
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Sep 21;4(9):e1035. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001035. eCollection 2016 Sep.
6
Computation of breast ptosis from 3D surface scans of the female torso.基于女性躯干三维表面扫描计算乳房下垂情况。
Comput Biol Med. 2016 Nov 1;78:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
7
The Aesthetically Ideal Position of the Nipple-Areola Complex on the Breast.乳头乳晕复合体在乳房上的美学理想位置。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):724-32. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0684-z. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
8
Nipple-areola complex reconstruction techniques: A literature review.乳头乳晕复合体重建技术:文献综述
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;42(4):441-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
9
Shapes, Proportions, and Variations in Breast Aesthetic Ideals: The Definition of Breast Beauty, Analysis, and Surgical Practice.乳房美学理想中的形状、比例及变异:乳房美的定义、分析与手术实践
Clin Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;42(4):451-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.012.
10
Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.肿瘤整形、重建及美容乳房手术的三维(3D)表面成像综述。
Breast. 2015 Aug;24(4):331-42. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 30.