Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Women's Cancer Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):757-768. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33310. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
We examined whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer (DT), a patient-reported outcome measure, could be used to identify levels and causes of distress associated with racial/ethnic disparities in time to care among patients with breast cancer.
We identified women aged ≥18 years with stage 0-IV breast cancer who were diagnosed in a single health system between January 2014 and July 2016. The baseline visit was defined as the first postdiagnosis, pretreatment clinical evaluation. Zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression (modeling non-zero DT scores and DT scores = 0) and logistic regression (modeling DT score ≥ 4, threshold for social services referral) were used to examine associations between baseline score (0 = none to 10 = extreme) and types of stressors (emotional, familial, practical, physical, spiritual) after adjustment for race/ethnicity and other characteristics. Linear regression with log transformation was used to identify predictors of time to evaluation and time to treatment.
A total of 1029 women were included (median baseline DT score = 4). Emotional, physical, and practical stressors were associated with distress in both the ZINB and logistic models (all P < .05). Black patients (n = 258) were more likely to report no distress than Whites (n = 675; ZINB zero model odds ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.68-4.40; P < .001) despite reporting a similar number of stressors (P = .07). Higher DT scores were associated with shorter time to evaluation and time to treatment while being Black and having physical or practical stressors were associated with delays in both (all P < .05).
Patient-reported stressors predicted delays in time to care, but patient-reported levels of distress did not, with Black patients having delayed time to care despite reporting low levels of distress. We describe anticipatory, culturally responsive strategies for using patient-reported outcomes to address observed disparities.
我们研究了美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)苦恼温度计(DT),一种患者报告的结果衡量指标,是否可用于识别与乳腺癌患者护理时间相关的种族/民族差异相关的苦恼程度和原因。
我们纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 7 月在单一医疗系统中诊断为 0-IV 期乳腺癌的年龄≥18 岁的女性。基线访视为首次诊断后、治疗前的临床评估。我们使用零膨胀负二项式(ZINB)回归(对非零 DT 评分和 DT 评分=0 进行建模)和逻辑回归(对 DT 评分≥4,即社会服务转介的阈值进行建模)来检查基线评分(0=无至 10=极度)与情绪、家庭、实际、身体、精神等压力源类型之间的关联,在调整了种族/族裔和其他特征后。使用对数转换的线性回归来确定评估和治疗时间的预测指标。
共纳入 1029 名女性(中位基线 DT 评分=4)。在 ZINB 和逻辑模型中,情绪、身体和实际压力源与苦恼均相关(所有 P<.05)。黑人患者(n=258)报告无苦恼的可能性高于白人患者(n=675;ZINB 零模型优势比,2.72;95%CI,1.68-4.40;P<.001),尽管报告的压力源数量相似(P=.07)。较高的 DT 评分与评估和治疗时间缩短相关,而黑人身份和身体或实际压力源与两者的延迟都相关(所有 P<.05)。
患者报告的压力源预测了护理时间的延迟,但患者报告的苦恼程度没有,尽管黑人患者报告的苦恼程度较低,但他们的护理时间延迟。我们描述了预期性的、文化响应的策略,以利用患者报告的结果来解决观察到的差异。