• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分对动脉瘤生长或破裂的预测作用。

The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score as a predictor of aneurysm growth or rupture.

机构信息

Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Departments of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2021 Mar;28(3):837-843. doi: 10.1111/ene.14636. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1111/ene.14636
PMID:33175449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7898860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS) was built to harmonize the treatment decision making on unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Therefore, it may also function as a predictor of aneurysm progression. In this study, we aimed to assess the validity of the UIATS model to identify aneurysms at risk of growth or rupture during follow-up.

METHODS

We calculated the UIATS for a consecutive series of conservatively treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms, included in our prospectively kept neurovascular database. Computed tomography angiography and/or magnetic resonance angiography imaging at baseline and during follow-up was analyzed to detect aneurysm growth. We defined rupture as a cerebrospinal fluid or computed tomography-proven subarachnoid hemorrhage. We calculated the area under the receiver operator curve, sensitivity, and specificity, to determine the performance of the UIATS model.

RESULTS

We included 214 consecutive patients with 277 unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Aneurysms were followed for a median period of 1.3 years (range 0.3-11.7 years). During follow-up, 17 aneurysms enlarged (6.1%), and two aneurysms ruptured (0.7%). The UIATS model showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 44%. The area under the receiver operator curve was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.46-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Our observational study involving consecutive patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm showed poor performance of the UIATS model to predict aneurysm growth or rupture during follow-up.

摘要

背景与目的

未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)旨在协调未破裂颅内动脉瘤的治疗决策,因此,它也可能作为动脉瘤进展的预测因子。本研究旨在评估 UIATS 模型识别在随访期间有生长或破裂风险的动脉瘤的有效性。

方法

我们计算了连续系列保守治疗的未破裂颅内动脉瘤的 UIATS,这些动脉瘤被纳入我们前瞻性保存的神经血管数据库中。对基线和随访期间的计算机断层血管造影和/或磁共振血管造影成像进行分析,以检测动脉瘤生长。我们将破裂定义为蛛网膜下腔出血或计算机断层证实的蛛网膜下腔出血。我们计算了接收者操作特征曲线下的面积、敏感性和特异性,以确定 UIATS 模型的性能。

结果

我们纳入了 214 例连续患者的 277 个未破裂颅内动脉瘤。动脉瘤的随访中位数时间为 1.3 年(范围 0.3-11.7 年)。在随访期间,17 个动脉瘤增大(6.1%),2 个动脉瘤破裂(0.7%)。UIATS 模型的敏感性为 80%,特异性为 44%。接收者操作特征曲线下的面积为 0.62(95%置信区间 0.46-0.79)。

结论

我们的观察性研究涉及连续的未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者,结果表明 UIATS 模型在预测随访期间的动脉瘤生长或破裂方面表现不佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/755f/7898860/c35ac5a39beb/ENE-28-837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/755f/7898860/c35ac5a39beb/ENE-28-837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/755f/7898860/c35ac5a39beb/ENE-28-837-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score as a predictor of aneurysm growth or rupture.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分对动脉瘤生长或破裂的预测作用。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Mar;28(3):837-843. doi: 10.1111/ene.14636. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
2
Is the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score (UIATS) sensitive enough to detect aneurysms at risk of rupture?未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)是否足够敏感以检测有破裂风险的动脉瘤?
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01246-x. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Clinical relevance of short-term follow-up of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.未破裂颅内动脉瘤的短期随访的临床意义。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS1995.
4
Retrospective Application of UIATS Recommendations to a Multicenter Cohort of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: How It Would Have Oriented the Treatment Choices?回顾性应用 UIATS 建议对破裂颅内动脉瘤多中心队列的影响:它将如何指导治疗选择?
World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;147:e262-e271. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.041. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Application of unruptured aneurysm scoring systems to a cohort of ruptured aneurysms: are we underestimating rupture risk?未破裂动脉瘤评分系统在破裂动脉瘤队列中的应用:我们是否低估了破裂风险?
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Dec;44(6):3487-3498. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01523-3. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
6
Comparison of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score and PHASES Score in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients With Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms.蛛网膜下腔出血合并多发性颅内动脉瘤患者未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分与PHASES评分的比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 7;12:616497. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.616497. eCollection 2021.
7
Sensitivity of the Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS) in the Elderly: Retrospective Analysis of Ruptured Aneurysms.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)在老年人中的敏感性:破裂动脉瘤的回顾性分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e673-e677. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
8
Comparison of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score recommendations with clinical treatment results - A series of 322 aneurysms.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分建议与临床治疗结果的比较——一系列 322 个动脉瘤。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Apr;98:104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.01.038. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
Morphology of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.破裂和未破裂颅内动脉瘤的形态学
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:610-617. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.053. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
10
Comparison of Rates of Growth between Unruptured and Ruptured Aneurysms Using Magnetic Resonance Angiography.使用磁共振血管造影术比较未破裂和破裂动脉瘤的生长速率
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Dec;26(12):2849-2854. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Serum Desmosine Levels Might Be Associated with the Size of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-A Preliminary Study.血清去甲胍丁胺水平可能与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者破裂脑动脉瘤的大小相关——一项初步研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2056. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062056.
2
Enhancing intracranial aneurysm rupture risk prediction with a novel multivariable logistic regression model incorporating high-resolution vessel wall imaging.利用纳入高分辨率血管壁成像的新型多变量逻辑回归模型增强颅内动脉瘤破裂风险预测
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1507082. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1507082. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Is the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score (UIATS) sensitive enough to detect aneurysms at risk of rupture?未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)是否足够敏感以检测有破裂风险的动脉瘤?
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01246-x. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Treatment Scoring of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.颅内未破裂动脉瘤的治疗评分。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2344-2350. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025599. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Clinical relevance of short-term follow-up of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Retrospective Application of Risk Scores to Unruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.
风险评分在未破裂前交通动脉瘤中的回顾性应用
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 30;13(3):789. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030789.
4
A Future Blood Test to Detect Cerebral Aneurysms.一种未来用于检测脑动脉瘤的血液检测方法。
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2023 Aug;43(6):2697-2711. doi: 10.1007/s10571-023-01346-4. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
5
Genetic association between the lncRNA ANRIL rs10757272 polymorphism and intracranial aneurysm susceptibility in Asians.长链非编码 RNA ANRIL rs10757272 多态性与亚洲人群颅内动脉瘤易感性的遗传关联。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Dec 13;46(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01927-9.
6
Geometric uncertainty in intracranial aneurysm rupture status discrimination: a two-site retrospective study.颅内动脉瘤破裂状态判别中的几何不确定性:一项两地回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):e063051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063051.
7
Risk factors of intracranial infection in patients after intracranial aneurysm surgery: Implication for treatment strategies.颅内动脉瘤手术后患者颅内感染的危险因素:对治疗策略的启示
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 3;100(48):e27946. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027946.
8
VICTORIA: VIrtual neck Curve and True Ostium Reconstruction of Intracranial Aneurysms.维多利亚:颅内动脉瘤的虚拟颈部曲线和真实口重建。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2021 Aug;12(4):454-465. doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00535-w. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
Current decision support tools fail to agree or predict therapeutic decisions in a single cohort of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.目前的决策支持工具未能在未破裂颅内动脉瘤的单一队列中达成或预测治疗决策。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Mar;164(3):771-779. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04852-w. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
Application of unruptured aneurysm scoring systems to a cohort of ruptured aneurysms: are we underestimating rupture risk?未破裂动脉瘤评分系统在破裂动脉瘤队列中的应用:我们是否低估了破裂风险?
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Dec;44(6):3487-3498. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01523-3. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
未破裂颅内动脉瘤的短期随访的临床意义。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS1995.
4
Management of incidental aneurysms: comparison of single Centre multi-disciplinary team decision making with the unruptured incidental aneurysm treatment score.偶然发现的动脉瘤的管理:单中心多学科团队决策与未破裂偶然发现动脉瘤治疗评分的比较
Br J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;32(5):536-540. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1468019. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
The application of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a retrospective, single-center study.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分的应用:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Oct;41(4):1021-1028. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0944-2. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Validation of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: comparison with real-world cerebrovascular practice.颅内未破裂动脉瘤治疗评分的验证:与真实世界的脑血管实践比较。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;129(1):100-106. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS17548. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
ELAPSS score for prediction of risk of growth of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.用于预测未破裂颅内动脉瘤生长风险的ELAPSS评分
Neurology. 2017 Apr 25;88(17):1600-1606. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003865. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Prevalence, Clinical Management, and Natural Course of Incidental Findings on Brain MR Images: The Population-based Rotterdam Scan Study.脑磁共振成像偶然发现的患病率、临床管理和自然病程:基于人群的鹿特丹扫描研究。
Radiology. 2016 Nov;281(2):507-515. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160218. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
The Delphi Oracle and the management of aneurysms.德尔菲神谕与动脉瘤的管理。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jul;9(e1):e1-e2. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012124. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
10
The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a multidisciplinary consensus.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分:多学科共识
Neurology. 2015 Sep 8;85(10):881-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001891. Epub 2015 Aug 14.