• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)是否足够敏感以检测有破裂风险的动脉瘤?

Is the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score (UIATS) sensitive enough to detect aneurysms at risk of rupture?

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Göttingen University Hospital, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01246-x. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-020-01246-x
PMID:32166509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8035089/
Abstract

To evaluate if the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score (UIATS) is a sensitive tool to detect aneurysms at risk of rupture, we conducted an a posteriori retrospective study on ruptured intracranial aneurysms. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients admitted to our center from January 2010 to April 2016 with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The UIATS was applied to all ruptured aneurysms. Patients for whom the UIATS recommended treatment were labeled as "true positives," whereas patients for whom the UIATS recommended observation were labeled as "false negatives." Patients for whom the UIATS was inconclusive were excluded from the final analysis. Based on the UIATS recommendation, a sensitivity analysis was performed. A total of 262 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were screened. Of these, 212 were included in our analysis. Median age was 53 years (23-90). Most patients were females (n = 134, 63%), with an equal distribution between low-grade and high-grade hemorrhages (Hunt & Hess ≥ 3 n = 107, 50%). UIATS recommended treatment in n = 52, 25% cases (TP), was inconclusive in n = 93, 44% (excluded), and recommended observation in n = 67, 32% (FN). Based on these data, the UIATS showed a sensitivity of 44% (CI 35-53%). The UIATS exhibits rather low sensitivity for detecting aneurysms at risk of rupture.

摘要

为了评估未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)是否是一种检测破裂颅内动脉瘤风险的敏感工具,我们对破裂颅内动脉瘤进行了一项回顾性的、事后的研究。我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 4 月期间因蛛网膜下腔出血而入住我们中心的成年患者进行了回顾性分析。对所有破裂的动脉瘤都应用了 UIATS。对 UIATS 建议治疗的患者标记为“真阳性”,而对 UIATS 建议观察的患者标记为“假阴性”。对 UIATS 不确定的患者排除在最终分析之外。根据 UIATS 的建议进行了敏感性分析。共筛选出 262 例蛛网膜下腔出血患者,其中 212 例纳入本分析。中位年龄为 53 岁(23-90 岁)。大多数患者为女性(n=134,63%),低分级和高分级出血之间分布均衡(Hunt & Hess ≥3 n=107,50%)。UIATS 建议治疗 n=52 例(25%),建议观察 n=67 例(32%),不确定 n=93 例(44%)。基于这些数据,UIATS 的敏感性为 44%(CI 35-53%)。UIATS 检测破裂风险动脉瘤的敏感性较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de4e/8035089/6cd4a41ee1c4/10143_2020_1246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de4e/8035089/6cd4a41ee1c4/10143_2020_1246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de4e/8035089/6cd4a41ee1c4/10143_2020_1246_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score (UIATS) sensitive enough to detect aneurysms at risk of rupture?未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)是否足够敏感以检测有破裂风险的动脉瘤?
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01246-x. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Sensitivity of the Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS) to detect aneurysms at high-risk of rupture: Retrospective analysis in a cohort of 346 patients with a proven subarachnoid hemorrhage.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分 (UIATS) 检测高破裂风险动脉瘤的敏感性:一项前瞻性分析 346 例蛛网膜下腔出血患者的队列研究。
Neurochirurgie. 2024 Nov;70(6):101591. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101591. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
3
The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score as a predictor of aneurysm growth or rupture.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分对动脉瘤生长或破裂的预测作用。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Mar;28(3):837-843. doi: 10.1111/ene.14636. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
Sensitivity of the Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS) in the Elderly: Retrospective Analysis of Ruptured Aneurysms.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分(UIATS)在老年人中的敏感性:破裂动脉瘤的回顾性分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e673-e677. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
5
Retrospective Application of UIATS Recommendations to a Multicenter Cohort of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: How It Would Have Oriented the Treatment Choices?回顾性应用 UIATS 建议对破裂颅内动脉瘤多中心队列的影响:它将如何指导治疗选择?
World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;147:e262-e271. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.041. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Comparison of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score and PHASES Score in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients With Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms.蛛网膜下腔出血合并多发性颅内动脉瘤患者未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分与PHASES评分的比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 7;12:616497. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.616497. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms.CTA与数字减影血管造影在破裂动脉瘤诊断中的比较
Neurosurgery. 2017 May 1;80(5):769-777. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw113.
8
The application of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a retrospective, single-center study.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分的应用:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Oct;41(4):1021-1028. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0944-2. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Application of unruptured aneurysm scoring systems to a cohort of ruptured aneurysms: are we underestimating rupture risk?未破裂动脉瘤评分系统在破裂动脉瘤队列中的应用:我们是否低估了破裂风险?
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Dec;44(6):3487-3498. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01523-3. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
Comparison of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score recommendations with clinical treatment results - A series of 322 aneurysms.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分建议与临床治疗结果的比较——一系列 322 个动脉瘤。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Apr;98:104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.01.038. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge- safety and efficacy.使用编织型血管内桥接装置对颅内动脉瘤进行血管内治疗——安全性与有效性
Neuroradiology. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03673-3.
2
Fluid structure Interaction analysis for rupture risk assessment in patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms.大脑中动脉动脉瘤患者破裂风险评估的流固耦合分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-85066-9.
3
An overview of decision-making in cerebrovascular treatment strategies: Part I - unruptured aneurysms.
脑血管治疗策略中的决策概述:第一部分 - 未破裂动脉瘤
Brain Spine. 2024 Sep 5;4:103331. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103331. eCollection 2024.
4
In Vivo Deformation of the Human Basilar Artery.人基底动脉的体内变形
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Jan;53(1):83-98. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03605-x. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
5
Retrospective Application of Risk Scores to Unruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.风险评分在未破裂前交通动脉瘤中的回顾性应用
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 30;13(3):789. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030789.
6
Geometric uncertainty in intracranial aneurysm rupture status discrimination: a two-site retrospective study.颅内动脉瘤破裂状态判别中的几何不确定性:一项两地回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):e063051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063051.
7
The Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-Weather Myth: A Long-Term Big Data and Deep Learning Analysis.蛛网膜下腔出血与天气的误解:一项长期大数据与深度学习分析
Front Neurol. 2021 May 5;12:653483. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.653483. eCollection 2021.
8
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Life (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;11(4):335. doi: 10.3390/life11040335.
9
The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score as a predictor of aneurysm growth or rupture.未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗评分对动脉瘤生长或破裂的预测作用。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Mar;28(3):837-843. doi: 10.1111/ene.14636. Epub 2020 Dec 3.