Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2023503. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23503.
Many patients are admitted to the intensive care unit following surgery, and some of them will experience incomplete recovery. For patients in this situation, preoperative discussions regarding patient values and preferences may direct care decisions. Existing literature shows that it is uncommon for surgeons to have these conversations preoperatively; it is unclear whether anesthesia professionals engage with patients on this topic prior to surgery.
To review the literature on communication between patients and anesthesia professionals, with a focus on discussions related to postoperative critical care.
MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched using specific search criteria from January 1980 to April 2020. Studies describing encounters between patients and anesthesia professionals were selected, and data regarding study objectives, study design, methodology, measures, outcomes, patient characteristics, and clinical setting were extracted and collated. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed.
A total of 12 studies including 1284 individual patient encounters were eligible for inclusion in the review. These studies demonstrated that communication between patients and anesthesia professionals related to postoperative care is rare: only 2 studies reported communication regarding adverse postoperative events, and this communication behavior was reported in only 46 of 1284 consultations (3.6%) across all studies. Additional findings were that communication during these encounters is dominated by anesthetic planning and perioperative logistics, with variable discussion of perioperative risks vs benefits and infrequent elicitation of patient values and preferences. Some data suggest that patients wish to be involved in perioperative decision-making but are often limited by an incomplete understanding of risks and benefits.
This systematic review found that communication in anesthesia is dominated by anesthetic planning and discussion of preoperative logistics, whereas postoperative critical care is rarely discussed. Most patients who are admitted to an intensive care unit after a major operation will not have had a discussion regarding goals of care specific to protracted recovery or prolonged intensive care with their anesthesiologist.
许多患者在手术后被送入重症监护病房,其中一些患者将经历不完全康复。对于这种情况的患者,术前讨论患者的价值观和偏好可能会指导护理决策。现有文献表明,外科医生很少在术前进行这些讨论;目前尚不清楚麻醉专业人员是否在手术前就这个话题与患者进行了沟通。
回顾患者与麻醉专业人员之间的沟通文献,重点讨论与术后重症监护相关的沟通。
使用特定的搜索标准,从 1980 年 1 月到 2020 年 4 月,在 MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 上进行了搜索。选择描述患者与麻醉专业人员之间接触的研究,并提取和整理研究目标、研究设计、方法、措施、结果、患者特征和临床环境的数据。
共有 12 项研究,包括 1284 名患者,符合纳入审查标准。这些研究表明,患者与麻醉专业人员之间关于术后护理的沟通很少见:只有 2 项研究报告了与不良术后事件有关的沟通,在所有研究中,这种沟通行为仅在 1284 次咨询中的 46 次(3.6%)中报告。其他发现是,这些接触中的沟通主要是由麻醉计划和围手术期后勤工作主导,围手术期风险与收益的讨论存在差异,患者价值观和偏好的征求很少。一些数据表明,患者希望参与围手术期决策,但往往由于对风险和收益的理解不完整而受到限制。
这项系统评价发现,麻醉中的沟通主要由麻醉计划和术前后勤工作讨论主导,而术后重症监护很少讨论。大多数在大手术后被送入重症监护病房的患者,其麻醉师没有与其讨论特定于长时间恢复或长时间重症监护的治疗目标。