Department of Geography and Spatial Information Techniques, Faculty of Geography, Tourism and Culture, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.
Ningbo Universities Collaborative Innovation Center for Land and Marine Spatial Utilization and Governance Research, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 9;17(21):8282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218282.
Nature-based recreation in urban areas is essential for the well-being of citizens. Park green space (PGS) is a necessary urban infrastructure and a critical step of urban planning and policy-making. The existing research on PGS only focuses on service allocation problems existing in the current urban development, ignoring changes in residential communities accessibility. This research provides new ideas to evaluate PGS. Based on parks and residential communities' data, we adopt an improved Gaussian-based two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method to evaluate PGS accessibility in Ningbo (China) and its matching with different levels of residential areas. We present a case study in Ningbo, and discuss its implications for PGS management. This study contains two elements: (a) Compare the current and initial PGS accessibility of each community to accurately identify the communities with PGS vacancies. (b) Analyze and discuss the association between community accessibility and residential house prices. Compare the PGS coverage ratios of communities at different levels to determine the equity of PGS planning in Ningbo. We found that the level of PGS allocation in the central area of Ningbo is high. Obviously, high-value clusters are formed in Sanjiangkou, Zhenhai New Town, Southern and Eastern Yinzhou. The accessibility level in the middle area of Yinzhou is low, and there are super high accessibility residential communities in the outer city area. There is an exact period of green space vacancy in the middle and the outer area. The residential areas with ultra-high accessibility did not configure PGS services at the beginning of their construction. There is no noticeable difference in PGS accessibility of residential communities of different levels at present, but 149 low- and middle-income residential communities lack green space service when the construction was completed. High-end residential communities have priority on enjoying park green space services. Our study suggests that PGS accessibility should be studied temporally and spatially for each residential community. The Ningbo government should strengthen the balanced construction of green space in parks and guarantee green space services for low-end residential communities to improve green space equity.
城市自然游憩对市民福祉至关重要。公园绿地(PGS)是城市基础设施的必要组成部分,也是城市规划和政策制定的关键步骤。现有的 PGS 研究仅关注当前城市发展中存在的服务分配问题,而忽略了居住社区可达性的变化。本研究为评估 PGS 提供了新思路。基于公园和居住社区的数据,我们采用改进的基于高斯的两步浮动集水面积(2SFCA)方法来评估宁波(中国)的 PGS 可达性及其与不同层次居住社区的匹配情况。我们在宁波进行了案例研究,并讨论了其对 PGS 管理的启示。本研究包含两个要素:(a)比较每个社区当前和初始的 PGS 可达性,以准确识别 PGS 空缺的社区。(b)分析和讨论社区可达性与住宅房价之间的关联。比较不同层次社区的 PGS 覆盖率,以确定宁波 PGS 规划的公平性。我们发现,宁波中心区的 PGS 分配水平较高。显然,三江口、镇海新城、鄞州南部和东部形成了高价值集群。鄞州中部地区的可达性水平较低,而外城区则存在超高可达性的居住社区。在中部和外城区存在确切的绿地空缺期。在建设初期,超高可达性的居住社区没有配置 PGS 服务。目前,不同层次的居住社区的 PGS 可达性没有明显差异,但 149 个中低收入居住社区在建成时缺乏绿地服务。高端住宅社区优先享受公园绿地服务。我们的研究表明,应从时间和空间上对每个居住社区的 PGS 可达性进行研究。宁波政府应加强公园绿地的均衡建设,保障中低端居住社区的绿地服务,提高绿地公平性。