Department of Expertise and Treatment, Argos Zorggroep, Schiedam, The Netherlands
Department of Medical Ethics and Health Law (E&R), Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 12;10(11):e038528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038528.
Conducting advance care planning (ACP) conversations with people with dementia and their relatives contributes to providing care according to their preferences. In this review, we identify moral considerations which may hinder or facilitate physicians in conducting ACP in dementia.
For this meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases between 2005 and 30 August 2019. We included empirical studies concerning physicians' moral barriers and facilitators of conversations about end-of-life preferences in dementia care. The protocol was registered at Prospero (CRD42019123308).
Physicians and nurse practitioners providing medical care to people with dementia in long-term and primary care settings. We also include observations from patients or family caregivers witnessing physicians' moral considerations.
Physicians' moral considerations involving ethical dilemmas for ACP. We define moral considerations as the weighing by the professional caregiver of values and norms aimed at providing good care that promotes the fundamental interests of the people involved and which possibly ensues dilemmas.
Of 1347 studies, we assessed 22 systematic reviews and 51 primary studies as full texts. We included 11 systematic reviews and 13 primary studies. Themes included: (1) beneficence and non-maleficence; (2) respecting dignity; (3) responsibility and ownership; (4) relationship and (5) courage. Moral dilemmas related to the physician as a professional and as a person. For most themes, there were considerations that either facilitated or hindered ACP, depending on physician's interpretation or the context.
Physicians feel a responsibility to provide high-quality end-of-life care to patients with dementia. However, the moral dilemmas this may involve, can lead to avoidant behaviour concerning ACP. If these dilemmas are not recognised, discussed and taken into account, implementation of ACP as a process between physicians, persons with dementia and their family caregivers may fail.
与痴呆症患者及其亲属进行预先护理计划(ACP)对话有助于根据他们的意愿提供护理。在本次综述中,我们确定了可能阻碍或促进医生在痴呆症中进行 ACP 的道德考虑因素。
这是对系统评价和原始研究的元综述,我们在 2005 年至 2019 年 8 月 30 日期间搜索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO 数据库。我们纳入了关于医生在痴呆症护理中关于临终偏好的对话的道德障碍和促进因素的经验研究。该方案在 Prospero(CRD42019123308)上进行了注册。
在长期和初级保健环境中为痴呆症患者提供医疗服务的医生和护士从业者。我们还包括观察到目睹医生道德考虑因素的患者或家属护理人员的情况。
医生进行 ACP 涉及的道德考虑因素,即伦理困境。我们将道德考虑因素定义为专业护理人员对旨在提供促进所涉及人员基本利益的良好护理的价值观和规范的权衡,并且可能会导致困境。
在 1347 项研究中,我们评估了 22 项系统评价和 51 项原始研究作为全文。我们纳入了 11 项系统评价和 13 项原始研究。主题包括:(1)善行和不伤害;(2)尊重尊严;(3)责任和所有权;(4)关系和(5)勇气。这些道德困境与医生作为专业人士和个人有关。对于大多数主题,医生的解释或背景决定了这些主题是促进还是阻碍 ACP。
医生感到有责任为痴呆症患者提供高质量的临终关怀。然而,这可能涉及到的道德困境可能导致医生回避 ACP。如果这些困境没有被认识到、讨论并考虑在内,那么医生、痴呆症患者及其家属之间作为一个过程的 ACP 的实施可能会失败。