Institute of Cultural Anthropology and Development Sociology, 450192Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
TRANZO Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University;, Tilburg, the Netherlands Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Dementia (London). 2022 Apr;21(3):918-933. doi: 10.1177/14713012211066370. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
Dementia is widely considered a progressive condition associated with changes in cognitive capacities, which promotes the idea that people with dementia need to anticipate end-of-life care preferences. There is a growing body of interventions meant to support advance care planning (ACP) for people with dementia and their families. However, a deeper understanding of their experiences and expectations regarding planning the end of life is needed to inform ethically sound and person-centered ACP. This study explores how end-of-life care planning for people with dementia is experienced and perceived in practice.
We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data from in-depth interviews and ethnographic fieldwork. Participants included people with dementia living in the community or in nursing homes, family caregivers, and professional caregivers. During reflective sessions, the researchers moved back and forth between their original data and overarching topics related to ACP. Both performed deductive coding to filter relevant information from their data. Ongoing discussions allowed for the fine-tuning of themes.
End-of-life care planning for people with dementia can encompass a paradox of control. While it may foster a sense of being in control, it may also feel like relinquishing control over future situations. It raises concerns regarding responsibility, as present, former and future wishes may not align. Family caregivers are often responsible for concrete end-of-life decision-making, prompting them to weigh previous wishes against present situations. Further, people with dementia may wish to focus on the present and distance themselves from the future.
Advance decisions about end-of-life care are often decontextualized and people may find it difficult to oversee their future conditions and preferences. The widely recognized purpose of ACP to exert control over end-of-life care may need revision to match the needs of people with dementia while they are coping with their condition and an uncertain future.
痴呆症被广泛认为是一种与认知能力变化相关的进行性疾病,这促使人们认为痴呆症患者需要预先考虑临终关怀偏好。目前有越来越多的干预措施旨在支持痴呆症患者及其家属的预先护理计划(ACP)。然而,为了为痴呆症患者提供有道德且以患者为中心的 ACP,需要更深入地了解他们对规划生命末期的体验和期望。
我们对深入访谈和民族志实地考察的定性数据进行了二次分析。参与者包括居住在社区或疗养院的痴呆症患者、家庭照顾者和专业照顾者。在反思会议期间,研究人员在原始数据和与 ACP 相关的总体主题之间来回移动。两者都使用演绎编码从数据中筛选相关信息。持续的讨论允许对主题进行微调。
痴呆症患者的临终关怀规划可能包含控制的悖论。虽然它可以增强控制感,但也可能感觉像是放弃对未来情况的控制。它引发了关于责任的问题,因为现在、以前和未来的愿望可能不一致。家庭照顾者通常负责具体的临终决策,这促使他们权衡以前的愿望与当前的情况。此外,痴呆症患者可能希望关注当下,远离未来。
关于临终关怀的预先决定往往是没有背景的,人们可能很难监督他们的未来情况和偏好。ACP 被广泛认为是控制临终关怀的目的,可能需要进行修订,以满足痴呆症患者在应对病情和不确定的未来时的需求。