The Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia , Athens, GA, USA.
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California , Berkeley, CA, USA.
Pathog Glob Health. 2020 Dec;114(8):407-425. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1833161. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2, a coronavirus with suspected bat origins, highlights a critical need for heightened understanding of the mechanisms by which bats maintain potentially zoonotic viruses at the population level and transmit these pathogens across species. We review mechanistic models, which test hypotheses of the transmission dynamics that underpin viral maintenance in bat systems. A search of the literature identified only twenty-five mechanistic models of bat-virus systems published to date, derived from twenty-three original studies. Most models focused on rabies and related lyssaviruses (eleven), followed by Ebola-like filoviruses (seven), Hendra and Nipah-like henipaviruses (five), and coronaviruses (two). The vast majority of studies has modelled bat virus transmission dynamics at the population level, though a few nested within-host models of viral pathogenesis in population-level frameworks, and one study focused on purely within-host dynamics. Population-level studies described bat virus systems from every continent but Antarctica, though most were concentrated in North America and Africa; indeed, only one simulation model with no associated data was derived from an Asian bat-virus system. In fact, of the twenty-five models identified, only ten population-level models were fitted to data - emphasizing an overall dearth of empirically derived epidemiological inference in bat virus systems. Within the data fitted subset, the vast majority of models were fitted to serological data only, highlighting extensive uncertainty in our understanding of the transmission status of a wild bat. Here, we discuss similarities and differences in the approach and findings of previously published bat virus models and make recommendations for improvement in future work.
SARS-CoV-2 的出现,这种冠状病毒疑似源自蝙蝠,凸显出我们迫切需要提高对蝙蝠在种群水平上维持潜在人畜共患病病毒以及跨物种传播这些病原体的机制的理解。我们回顾了机械模型,这些模型测试了支撑病毒在蝙蝠系统中维持的传输动力学假说。通过文献检索,仅发现了迄今为止发表的 25 种蝙蝠-病毒系统的机械模型,这些模型源自 23 项原始研究。大多数模型集中在狂犬病和相关的狂犬病病毒(11 种),其次是埃博拉样丝状病毒(7 种)、亨德拉和尼帕样亨尼帕病毒(5 种)和冠状病毒(2 种)。绝大多数研究都集中在种群水平上的蝙蝠病毒传播动力学上,尽管有一些模型嵌套在基于种群水平的病毒发病机制的宿主内模型中,还有一项研究则集中在纯粹的宿主内动力学上。除南极洲外,所有大陆都有描述蝙蝠病毒系统的研究,但大多数研究集中在北美和非洲;事实上,只有一个纯粹基于宿主内动态的模拟模型没有相关数据,源自亚洲的蝙蝠-病毒系统。事实上,在确定的 25 个模型中,只有 10 个种群水平模型拟合了数据——这强调了在蝙蝠病毒系统中,基于经验的流行病学推断总体上非常缺乏。在拟合数据的子集中,绝大多数模型仅拟合血清学数据,这突出表明我们对野生蝙蝠的传播状况的理解存在很大的不确定性。在这里,我们讨论了以前发表的蝙蝠病毒模型在方法和发现上的异同,并为未来的工作提出了改进建议。