Kim Yong Sang, Suh Dong Suk, Tak Dae Hyun, Chung Pill Ku, Kwon Yoo Beom, Kim Tae Yong, Koh Yong Gon
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Stem Cell & Arthritis Research, Yonsei Sarang Hospital, 10, Hyoryeong-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Exp Orthop. 2020 Nov 13;7(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00310-1.
Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) has shown promises in reducing pain and improving physical function in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Recently, cell-based therapies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as potential treatments. However, few studies have compared the treatment outcomes between MSCs and HA. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of intra-articular injections of MSCs versus HA in patients with knee OA.
A cohort of 209 patients with knee OA were retrospectively screened for those who underwent intra-articular injections using MSCs or HA. Thirty MSC-treated patients (MSC group) were pair-matched with thirty HA-treated patients (HA group) based on gender and age. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) rating system, and Lysholm scoring system. Radiological evaluation was assessed using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grading system.
MSC treatment yielded consistent significant improvements in VAS, IKDC and Lysholm scores. In the HA group, VAS scores significantly decreased at 1 month, slightly increased at 3 months, and increased significantly from 3 months to 1 year after injection. The IKDC and Lysholm scores improved significantly until 3 months, but gradually worsened thereafter. Significantly greater improvements in VAS (P = 0.041), IKDC (P = 0.014), and Lysholm (P = 0.020) scores were observed in the MSC group compared to those in the HA group at 1-year post-treatment. The K-L grade worsened in a few patients, especially those in the HA group, albeit no significant difference.
MSC group showed better VAS, IKDC, and Lysholm scores at 1-year post-treatment, compared to the HA group, although earlier clinical improvements were superior in the HA group for the initial 3 months.
Therapeutic study, Level III.
关节腔内注射透明质酸(HA)在减轻膝关节骨关节炎(OA)疼痛和改善身体功能方面已显示出前景。近来,使用间充质干细胞(MSCs)的细胞疗法已成为潜在的治疗方法。然而,很少有研究比较MSCs和HA的治疗效果。本研究旨在比较膝关节OA患者关节腔内注射MSCs与HA的临床和放射学结果。
回顾性筛选了209例接受过MSCs或HA关节腔内注射的膝关节OA患者。根据性别和年龄,将30例接受MSCs治疗的患者(MSCs组)与30例接受HA治疗的患者(HA组)进行配对。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分系统和Lysholm评分系统评估临床结果。使用Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L)分级系统进行放射学评估。
MSCs治疗使VAS、IKDC和Lysholm评分持续显著改善。在HA组中,VAS评分在注射后1个月显著降低,3个月时略有升高,从3个月到1年显著升高。IKDC和Lysholm评分在3个月前显著改善,但此后逐渐恶化。与HA组相比,治疗后1年时MSCs组的VAS(P = 0.041)、IKDC(P = 0.014)和Lysholm(P = 0.020)评分改善更显著。少数患者的K-L分级恶化,尤其是HA组患者,尽管无显著差异。
与HA组相比,MSCs组在治疗后1年时VAS、IKDC和Lysholm评分更好,尽管HA组在最初3个月的临床改善更优。
治疗性研究,III级。