Suppr超能文献

Meta 分析中干细胞治疗膝骨关节炎临床试验方法学缺陷:系统评价。

Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Chair of Anatomy II, Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Isar Klinikum, General Management, 80331 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Cells. 2022 Mar 11;11(6):965. doi: 10.3390/cells11060965.

Abstract

(1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January 2020 and July 2021, came to inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality. It is possible that a separate meta-analysis based on an independent, systematic assessment of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells may reach a different conclusion. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells. All clinical studies and meta-analyses identified were evaluated in detail, as were all sub-analyses included in the meta-analyses. (3) Results: The inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of treating pkOA with stem cells in the 19 assessed meta-analyses were most probably based on substantial differences in literature search strategies among different authors, misconceptions about meta-analyses themselves, and misconceptions about the comparability of different types of stem cells with regard to their safety and regenerative potential. An independent, systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 183 studies, of which 33 were randomized clinical trials, including a total of 6860 patients with pkOA. However, it was not possible to perform a scientifically sound meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should interpret the results of the 19 assessed meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells with caution and should be cautious of the conclusions drawn therein. Clinicians and researchers should strive to participate in FDA and/or EMA reviewed and approved clinical trials to provide clinically and statistically valid efficacy.

摘要

(1) 背景:临床研究的荟萃分析结论可能会极大地影响预期患者和医疗保健利益相关者的意见。2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月期间,共有 19 项关于干细胞治疗原发性膝骨关节炎 (pkOA) 的临床研究荟萃分析得出了不一致的结论,认为这种治疗方法的疗效存在差异。基于对干细胞治疗 pkOA 的临床研究进行独立、系统评估的单独荟萃分析,可能会得出不同的结论。(2) 方法:系统检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 中关于干细胞治疗 pkOA 的临床研究和荟萃分析。详细评估了确定的所有临床研究和荟萃分析,以及荟萃分析中包含的所有亚分析。(3) 结果:在评估的 19 项荟萃分析中,关于干细胞治疗 pkOA 疗效的不一致结论,最可能是由于不同作者的文献检索策略存在很大差异、对荟萃分析本身的误解以及对不同类型干细胞的安全性和再生潜力的可比性存在误解所致。对文献进行独立、系统的回顾共产生了 183 项研究,其中 33 项为随机临床试验,共纳入 6860 例 pkOA 患者。然而,无法进行科学合理的荟萃分析。(4) 结论:临床医生应谨慎解读 19 项关于干细胞治疗 pkOA 的临床研究荟萃分析的结果,并应谨慎考虑其中的结论。临床医生和研究人员应努力参与 FDA 和/或 EMA 审查和批准的临床试验,以提供临床和统计学上有效的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6731/8946093/e92d591f9e7e/cells-11-00965-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验