de Arruda Tarine Botta, Barbieri Ricardo Augusto, de Andrade Vitor Luiz, Cursiol Jônatas Augusto, Kalva-Filho Carlos Augusto, Bertucci Danilo Rodrigues, Papoti Marcelo
Laboratory of Aquatic Activities, School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, EEFERP-USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Estácio University Center of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Front Physiol. 2020 Oct 22;11:580711. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.580711. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to propose a conditioning activity (CA) model to stimulate improvement on neuromuscular responses, mechanical parameters and for the 50-m freestyle swimming. Thirteen male swimmers (19 ± 3 years and performances of 77% in relation to World Championship records) performed four CA protocols followed by a maximum performance in the 50-m freestyle. In the first protocol (P1) swimmers performed a standard warm-up (∼15 min); in the second protocol (P2) lunges (3 × 85% of the one-repetition maximum); in the third (P3) pull-ups (3 maximum repetitions) and box jumps 40 cm high and 60 cm deep (1 × 5 with 10% of the corporal weight); and in the fourth protocol (P4) a combination of exercises from the second and third protocols. CA protocols had no effect on the standard warm-up. However, P2 performance (27.01 ± 1.25 s) was similar to P1 (27.01 ± 1.18 s) and presented higher positive effects in mechanical parameters for the swim start performance in comparison to other protocols, contributing to improvements in the 50-m freestyle. In addition, turnaround time also had a negative effect, mainly in P3 (3.12 ± 0.28 s), signaling the improvement of this variable in all protocols (P1: 3.30 ± 0.38 s; P2: 3.17 ± 0.30 s; P4: 3.17 ± 0.34 s). P2 (after: 80 ± 11%; before: 82.7 ± 9.9%) and P3 (after: 82.7 ± 9.9%; before: 85.1 ± 9.7%) presented a possible positive effect on the percentage of voluntary activation in relation to P1 (after: 79.3 ± 10.7%; before: 76.3 ± 12%). In conclusion, the proposed conditioning activity protocols were not efficient for performance improvement in the 50-m freestyle compared to the standard model and seem to specifically influence each phase of the event.
本研究旨在提出一种调节活动(CA)模型,以促进神经肌肉反应、力学参数的改善,并提高50米自由泳成绩。13名男性游泳运动员(19±3岁,成绩为世界锦标赛纪录的77%)进行了4种CA方案,随后进行50米自由泳的最高成绩测试。在第一个方案(P1)中,游泳运动员进行标准热身(约15分钟);在第二个方案(P2)中,进行弓步蹲(3组,每组为一次重复最大值的85%);在第三个方案(P3)中,进行引体向上(3次最大重复次数)和40厘米高、60厘米深的箱式跳跃(1组,每组5次,重量为体重的10%);在第四个方案(P4)中,结合了第二个和第三个方案中的练习。CA方案对标准热身没有影响。然而,P2的成绩(27.01±1.25秒)与P1(27.01±1.18秒)相似,并且与其他方案相比,在游泳出发成绩的力学参数方面呈现出更高的积极影响,有助于提高50米自由泳成绩。此外,转身时间也有负面影响,主要在P3中(3.12±0.28秒),这表明所有方案中该变量都有改善(P1:3.30±0.38秒;P2:3.17±0.30秒;P4:3.17±0.34秒)。与P1相比,P2(之后:80±11%;之前:82.7±9.9%)和P3(之后:82.7±9.9%;之前:85.1±9.7%)在自愿激活百分比方面呈现出可能的积极影响(P1:之后:79.3±10.7%;之前:76.3±12%)。总之,与标准模型相比,所提出的调节活动方案对50米自由泳成绩的提高并不有效,且似乎对该项目的每个阶段都有特定影响。