Stott N C, Pill R M
Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff.
Fam Pract. 1987 Dec;4(4):278-86. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.4.278.
Ten years ago an academic group was established in Cardiff to determine why the public make life-style choices which are known to have an adverse impact on health and also to develop methods of measurement which describe trends in positive health motivation (salience) in the community. Three stages of this research are described in this paper and the results reveal a complex and fascinating set of human beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. Concern for health was not a consistent human characteristic and there was little evidence for the existence of a general preventive orientation in the cohorts studied. Discrepancies between expressed health beliefs/attitudes and behaviours are more explicable when the reality of ambiguity and paradox is recognized in human responses. Human responses to loss (grief) may have similarities to the respondents' experiences when facing a possible change of life-style for health reasons. The practical implications for primary care professionals are discussed.
十年前,一个学术团队在加的夫成立,旨在确定为何公众会做出已知对健康有不利影响的生活方式选择,并开发衡量方法以描述社区中积极健康动机(显著性)的趋势。本文描述了该研究的三个阶段,结果揭示了一系列复杂且引人入胜的人类信仰、态度和行为。对健康的关注并非人类的一贯特征,在所研究的队列中,几乎没有证据表明存在普遍的预防倾向。当认识到人类反应中存在模糊性和矛盾性这一现实时,所表达的健康信念/态度与行为之间的差异就更容易解释了。人类对损失(悲伤)的反应可能与受访者因健康原因面临生活方式可能改变时的经历相似。文中还讨论了对初级保健专业人员的实际影响。