From the Department of Radiology (K.D.S., T.R., E.L., B.H., R.V., S.G.), Department of Laboratory Medicine (D.D.S., G.A.M.), and Department of Pulmonary Diseases (I.D., B.B.), AZ Delta General Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800 Roeselare, Belgium; Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (G.A.M.); and Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Brussels Free University, Brussels, Belgium (G.A.M.).
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):E30-E37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202708. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Background The use of chest CT for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis or triage in health care settings with limited severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) capacity is controversial. COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) categorization of the level of COVID-19 suspicion might improve diagnostic performance. Purpose To investigate the value of chest CT with CO-RADS classification to screen for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and to determine its diagnostic performance in individuals with COVID-19 symptoms during the exponential phase of viral spread. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective trial, from March 2020 to April 2020, parallel SARS-CoV-2 PCR and CT with categorization of COVID-19 suspicion was performed with CO-RADS for individuals with COVID-19 symptoms and control participants without COVID-19 symptoms admitted to the hospital for medical emergencies unrelated to COVID-19. CT with CO-RADS was categorized on a five-point scale from 1 (very low suspicion) to 5 (very high suspicion). Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was calculated in symptomatic versus asymptomatic individuals to predict positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR, and likelihood ratios for each CO-RADS score were used for rational selection of diagnostic thresholds. Results A total of 859 individuals (median age, 70 years; interquartile range, 52-81 years; 443 men) with COVID-19 symptoms and 1138 control participants (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 52-81 years; 588 men) were evaluated. CT with CO-RADS had good diagnostic performance ( < .001) in both symptomatic (AUC, 0.89) and asymptomatic (AUC, 0.70) individuals. In symptomatic individuals (42% PCR positive), CO-RADS 3 or greater detected positive PCR with high sensitivity (89%, 319 of 358) and specificity of 73%. In asymptomatic individuals (5% PCR positive), a CO-RADS score of 3 or greater detected SARS-CoV-2 infection with low sensitivity (45%, 27 of 60) but high specificity (89%). Conclusion CT with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) had good diagnostic performance in symptomatic individuals, supporting its application for triage. Sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals was insufficient to justify its use as a first-line screening approach. Incidental detection of CO-RADS 3 or greater in asymptomatic individuals should trigger testing for respiratory pathogens. © RSNA, 2020
背景 对于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)聚合酶链反应(PCR)能力有限的医疗环境中,使用胸部 CT 对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)进行诊断或分诊存在争议。COVID-19 报告和数据系统(CO-RADS)对 COVID-19 可疑程度的分类可能会提高诊断性能。目的 研究胸部 CT 联合 CO-RADS 分类在筛查无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染中的价值,并确定其在病毒传播指数期出现 COVID-19 症状的个体中的诊断性能。材料与方法 本研究为前瞻性试验的二次分析,于 2020 年 3 月至 4 月期间,对因 COVID-19 以外的医疗急症住院的出现 COVID-19 症状的个体和无症状对照参与者同时进行 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 和 CT 检测,并对 COVID-19 可疑程度进行 CO-RADS 分类。CT 采用五分制(1 分:低度可疑;5 分:高度可疑)进行分类。计算症状性个体与无症状个体中 COVID-19 阳性预测值的受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)下面积(area under the receiver operating curve,AUC),并利用 CO-RADS 各评分的似然比来合理选择诊断阈值。结果 本研究共纳入 859 例出现 COVID-19 症状的个体(中位年龄为 70 岁,四分位距为 5281 岁;443 例男性)和 1138 例无症状对照参与者(中位年龄为 68 岁,四分位距为 5281 岁;588 例男性)。CT 联合 CO-RADS 在症状性个体(<.001)和无症状个体(<.001)中均具有良好的诊断性能(AUC 值分别为 0.89 和 0.70)。在症状性个体(42%的 PCR 阳性)中,CO-RADS 评分 3 分或更高者可检测到 SARS-CoV-2 感染,其阳性预测值高(89%,358 例中有 319 例),特异性为 73%。在无症状个体(5%的 PCR 阳性)中,CO-RADS 评分 3 分或更高者检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的敏感性较低(45%,60 例中有 27 例),但特异性较高(89%)。结论 在症状性个体中,COVID-19 报告和数据系统(CO-RADS)联合 CT 具有良好的诊断性能,支持其用于分诊。在无症状个体中,其敏感性不足以为其作为一线筛查方法提供依据。在无症状个体中偶然发现 CO-RADS 评分 3 分或更高者应触发呼吸道病原体检测。 © 2020 RSNA