Suppr超能文献

普通人群对免疫和疫苗接种证书的认知:一项针对抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体(SEROCoV-POP)血清学调查的嵌套研究。

Perceptions of immunity and vaccination certificates among the general population: a nested study within a serosurvey of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (SEROCoV-POP).

机构信息

Division of Primary Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Division of Primary Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland / Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland / University Centre for General Medicine and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Nov 16;150:w20398. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20398.

Abstract

At a time when COVID-19 immunity certificates are debated and vaccination certificates might potentially be made available if an effective vaccine is established, we conducted a study to elucidate public opinion on this issue. Our objective was to determine social and individual perceptions of COVID-19 immunity certificates through a population-based study. A nested survey within the SEROCoV-POP study, a population-based serosurvey of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Geneva, Switzerland, was conducted with a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was proposed to 1520 SEROCoV-POP participants. Measures included percentage of participants agreeing or disagreeing with statements on immunity and vaccination certificates. Stratification by age, gender, education and work status was used to examine socio-demographic variations. Of the 1520 SEROCoV-POP participants, 1425 completed the questionnaire (response rate 93%; mean age ± standard deviation 52 ± 15.1 years; 51.9% women). About 80% of participants agreed that knowing one’s serology status would lead to a change in one’s behaviour. In the event that the presence of antibodies correlated with immunity, 60% of participants reported that certificates should be offered to the general population. The results showed variations in perceptions of certificates depending on the context (73% agreed on certificates’ utility for travel, 72% for entering a country, and 32% for the right to work). Provided an effective vaccine was available, 55% of participants agreed that vaccination should be mandatory and 49% agreed that a vaccination certificate should be mandatory. About 68% reported a potential risk of discrimination and 28% a risk of deliberate infection. Differences were seen with age, gender and education level. This study shows that the general adult population in Geneva, Switzerland can envisage scenarios where COVID-19 immunity, and eventually vaccination, certificates would be useful. Seroprevalence estimates of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies remain low to date, and the interpretability of serological testing and immunity remains undefined. However, the information from this study is important, especially the differences based on context and the socio-demographic variations, and should be taken into account if COVID-19-related certificates are to be implemented.

摘要

在当前关于 COVID-19 免疫证书的争论以及如果有效的疫苗问世可能会提供疫苗接种证书的情况下,我们进行了一项研究,以阐明公众对此问题的看法。我们的目标是通过一项基于人群的研究来确定 COVID-19 免疫证书的社会和个人看法。在瑞士日内瓦进行的基于人群的抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体血清学调查 SEROCoV-POP 研究中,进行了一项嵌套调查,使用自我管理问卷进行调查。该问卷提供给了 1520 名 SEROCoV-POP 参与者。措施包括参与者对免疫和疫苗接种证书的声明表示同意或不同意的百分比。按年龄、性别、教育程度和工作状况分层,以检查社会人口统计学差异。在 1520 名 SEROCoV-POP 参与者中,有 1425 名完成了问卷(应答率 93%;平均年龄 ± 标准差 52 ± 15.1 岁;51.9%为女性)。约 80%的参与者同意了解自己的血清学状况会改变自己的行为。如果抗体的存在与免疫相关,60%的参与者表示应向普通人群提供证书。结果表明,根据情况的不同,对证书的看法存在差异(73%的人同意证书在旅行、72%的人同意进入一个国家和 32%的人同意工作的用途)。如果有效的疫苗可用,55%的参与者同意接种应该是强制性的,49%的人同意接种疫苗应该是强制性的。约 68%的人报告了潜在的歧视风险,28%的人报告了故意感染的风险。年龄、性别和教育程度存在差异。这项研究表明,瑞士日内瓦的普通成年人群体可以设想 COVID-19 免疫,以及最终的疫苗接种证书将是有用的情况。抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清流行率估计至今仍较低,血清学检测和免疫的可解释性仍未定义。然而,这项研究的信息非常重要,特别是基于情境和社会人口统计学的差异,如果要实施与 COVID-19 相关的证书,应考虑这些差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验