Department of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 17;10(1):19938. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77122-x.
The recent findings of increased Choroidal Thickness (CT) in Keratoconus (KC) patients raised the question of whether CT could be an indicator of progressive KC. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated and compared the choroidal profile in progressive and non-progressive KC. We ran a cross-sectional observational study in 76 patients diagnosed with KC, age 14-30, to assess KC progression. Progression was defined as when at least two of the studied variables confirmed progression (Kmax, Km, PachyMin, D-Index, Astig, K2, 3 mm PCR). Included patients performed a Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth image (EDI) technology to evaluate choroidal profile. Choroidal measurements were taken subfoveally and at 500 µm intervals from the fovea, in 7 different locations, and compared between groups. Multivariate linear regression analyses were also performed to assess the influence of CT in KC progression. Thirty-six eyes (47.4%) were classified as KC progressors. The mean subfoveal CT observed in the total sample was 382.0 (± 97.0) μm. The comparison between groups (progressive and non-progressive KC) showed no differences in the locations evaluated (mean subfoveal CT difference between groups was 2.4 μm, p = 0.915). In the multivariate analysis CT seems not be influenced by KC progression (B = 6.72 μm, 95% CI - 40.09 to 53.53, p = 0.775). Assessment of choroidal profile does not appear to be a useful tool to differentiate progressive and non-progressive KC. Further research is needed in order to better understand the role of choroid in KC.
最近的研究发现,圆锥角膜(KC)患者的脉络膜厚度(CT)增加,这引发了一个问题,即 CT 是否可以作为 KC 进展的指标。为了验证这一假设,我们评估并比较了进展性和非进展性 KC 患者的脉络膜形态。我们对 76 名年龄在 14 至 30 岁之间的 KC 患者进行了横断面观察性研究,以评估 KC 的进展情况。进展的定义为当至少两个研究变量确认进展时(Kmax、Km、PachyMin、D-Index、Astig、K2、3mm PCR)。纳入的患者进行了 Spectralis 光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检查,使用增强深度成像(EDI)技术评估脉络膜形态。在 7 个不同位置,在黄斑下和距黄斑 500μm 的间隔处进行脉络膜测量,并在组间进行比较。还进行了多元线性回归分析,以评估 CT 在 KC 进展中的影响。36 只眼(47.4%)被归类为 KC 进展者。总样本中观察到的黄斑下平均 CT 为 382.0(±97.0)μm。对组间(进展性和非进展性 KC)的比较显示,评估位置之间没有差异(组间平均黄斑下 CT 差异为 2.4μm,p=0.915)。在多元分析中,CT 似乎不受 KC 进展的影响(B=6.72μm,95%CI-40.09 至 53.53,p=0.775)。评估脉络膜形态似乎不是区分进展性和非进展性 KC 的有用工具。需要进一步研究以更好地了解脉络膜在 KC 中的作用。